Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Today, we will start with combinatorial proofs. Can anyone tell me what they think a combinatorial proof is?
I think it's a way to prove something using counting, not by simplifying the equations.
Exactly! Combinatorial proofs use counting arguments to show that two expressions represent the same quantity. We avoid expanding the expressions themselves.
Why can't we expand them?
Great question! If we expand, we lose the essence of combinatorial proofs. The focus is on how to count the same objects differently.
Can you give an example?
Certainly! We'll get there. Let's first establish some basic concepts.
Let’s examine the equality B8(n, k) = B8(n, n - k). What does LHS represent?
It’s the number of ways to choose k objects from n!
Right! And how about the RHS?
That's the number of ways to leave out n - k objects?
Exactly! This shows that both sides count the same selections just approached from different angles. Any questions?
So if you leave out n - k, you're implicitly selecting k?
Exactly! You’re understanding it well. This connection is vital in combinatorial proofs.
Now, let’s apply these concepts to Pascal’s identity. What does this identity state?
It states that B8(n + 1, k) = B8(n, k) + B8(n, k - 1).
Correct! To understand this, we consider n + 1 distinct objects. What if one object is always included?
Then we can choose the remaining from n objects, right?
Exactly, which gives us B8(n, k - 1). What about when this object is excluded?
Then we choose all k from the remaining n objects! That gives B8(n, k).
Perfect! By summing these groups of combinations, we arrive at the identity, demonstrating a clear combinatorial proof.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The section discusses the significance of combinatorial proofs as a counting argument to prove identities. It emphasizes how these proofs avoid simplification or expansion and instead count the same objects by different methods. A practical example illustrating Pascal's identity is provided to solidify understanding.
In this section, we delve into the concept of combinatorial proofs, a powerful strategy in combinatorics that relies on counting rather than algebraic simplification. The primary aim of a combinatorial proof is to show that two expressions, typically on the left-hand side (LHS) and right-hand side (RHS) of an equation, represent the same quantity but approached through different counting methods.
The section illustrates how to prove that B8(n, k) = B8(n, n - k) using a combinatorial argument. Instead of expanding the expressions, we interpret the LHS as the number of ways to select k objects from n, while the RHS rephrases the selection as determining which n - k objects to exclude. By establishing a direct correspondence between the two methods of selection, it becomes clear that both sides enumerate the same quantity.
We then introduce Pascal's identity, which further exemplifies the technique. By considering a scenario with n + 1 distinct objects, we divide the problem into two categories: selecting combinations where a particular object is included versus excluded. This division leads to the demonstrable equality that forms Pascal's identity: B8(n + 1, k) = B8(n, k) + B8(n, k - 1). Overall, this section highlights distinct approaches within combinatorial proofs, emphasizing that counting arguments yield robust results without venturing into algebraic manipulation.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now we are going to prove that the value of C(n, k) is the same as the value of C(n, n - k). Of course, one way of doing that is to expand C(n, k) and rewrite it as n! / (k!(n - k)!).
So I could have simply said that they are the same. But that is not the goal of combinatorial proof. In general when we are giving a combinatorial proof for proving LHS and RHS are the same, we do not expand or simplify the expressions on the left-hand side and right-hand side.
A combinatorial proof is a method where we show that two expressions are equal by counting the same set of objects in two different ways. Instead of directly calculating the left-hand side (LHS) and right-hand side (RHS), we focus on how many ways we can arrange or select objects. The goal is not to manipulate the formulas but to interpret them in a way that both sides represent the same count.
Imagine you have 10 different fruits and want to pick 3. You could think of it as picking which 3 fruits to take (LHS) or instead deciding which 7 fruits you will leave behind (RHS). Both methods lead to the same conclusion, illustrating that both sides of the equation represent the same choice situation, just viewed from different angles.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Suppose you are given n objects then your left-hand side is nothing but the number of ways in which you can pick k objects out of those n objects. That's the interpretation of C(n, k) function. Now it turns out for each of the ways in which you can select k objects, there is a way of excluding n - k objects.
Here, the LHS shows the count of selecting k objects from n. Alternatively, instead of focusing on what's being picked, you can count how many n - k objects you will leave out. This gives a different perspective on the same problem. By establishing this correspondence, we show that the total number of selections from either viewpoint is indeed the same.
Think of a birthday party planning scenario. If you have 10 guests and need to choose 3 to invite, you can either list the guests you are inviting or the 7 you are not inviting. The total counts in both cases will be the same, which demonstrates the equality of the two expressions through perspective.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now let's prove an interesting combinatorial identity using combinatorial proof. This is often called as Pascal's identity. So to prove this consider a collection of n + 1 objects. The left-hand side expression is C(n + 1, k), and I have to pick k objects. I can do that in C(n + 1, k) ways. Now I have to show that the same thing can be counted by adding two quantities on the right-hand side.
Pascal's Identity states that C(n + 1, k) can be expressed as the sum of C(n, k) and C(n, k - 1). The left side counts all possible combinations from n + 1 objects picked k at a time. The right side divides these combinations into two categories: those that include a particular object and those that do not. This separation allows us to count the total number effectively by adding the counts of the two categories.
Imagine having 11 different types of cookies, and you want to choose 4. You can count all combinations that include a specific cookie (Category 1) and those that do not include it (Category 2). By counting the combinations in each way and adding them together, you show that counting can be done differently while still reaching the same result.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now if I focus on the total of the different k-combinations that I can have out of this n + 1, I can have either a k-combination of Category 1 or a k-combination of Category 2. Namely in the k combination either, the specific object is there or it is not.
The categories of combinations are disjoint, meaning every k-combination can only fall into one of the two groups. By summing up the individual values of each category, we arrive at the total number of k-combinations for the set of n + 1 objects, thus validating Pascal's Identity and reinforcing the concept that the same number can be counted in multiple valid ways.
Continuing with the cookie example, every selection of 4 cookies is categorized as either including or excluding a specific type. Each selection either falls into one of these two distinct groups, ensuring there is no overlap, and counting both sets provides the complete picture of all combinations possible.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Combinatorial Proof: A method of proof focusing on counting arguments rather than simplifications.
Pascal's Identity: An important identity that connects different combinations of elements.
LHS and RHS: Terms for the left-hand and right-hand sides of equations, representing quantities derived from combinatorial reasoning.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
To prove that B8(n, k) = B8(n, n - k), count the ways to select k objects versus n - k objects.
Using Pascal's identity, the combinations from n + 1 objects can be categorized by including or excluding a specific object.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
Counting ways, we do not simplify, / In combinatorial proofs, we reach for the sky.
Imagine a party where you select guests; count those you invite and those who rest. This parallels how we can choose with zest!
Remember: Count 'E' (Excluding) or 'I' (Including) - that's how we show it's either way!
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Combinatorial Proof
Definition:
A method of proof that uses counting techniques rather than algebraic simplification.
Term: LHS (Left Hand Side)
Definition:
The expression or value found on the left side of an equation.
Term: RHS (Right Hand Side)
Definition:
The expression or value found on the right side of an equation.
Term: Pascal's Identity
Definition:
An identity in combinatorics that expresses a relationship between binomial coefficients.
Term: B8(n, k)
Definition:
The binomial coefficient representing the number of ways to choose k elements from a set of n elements.