Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Today, we will learn about combinatorial proofs. Can anyone tell me what they think a combinatorial proof is?
Is it about counting something in different ways?
Exactly! It's a counting argument used to prove identities without simplifying expressions. A good example is Pascal's Identity. Do you remember it?
Is that the one with the combinations and the formulas?
Yes! It states C(n, k) = C(n - 1, k) + C(n - 1, k - 1). The left side counts k-combinations out of n. Can someone explain why it matters to divide these into two categories?
Because it shows how we can count the same thing in different ways.
Correct! Remember, we don't have to expand the expressions like in algebra but focus on counting arguments. Let's dive deeper into this identity.
Now, let's go through Pascal's Identity step by step. Why do we use the concept of choosing objects?
To see how the objects can be selected in different combinations?
Precisely! So, if we have n objects and we want to choose k, we can split this into two categories: one where a specific object is included and one where it's not. Can someone tell me what happens in each case?
If the specific object is included, it reduces it to choosing k-1 from n-1.
And if it's not included, we just choose k from n-1 objects.
Exactly! Now add these two categories together, and what do we get?
C(n-1, k-1) + C(n-1, k)!
Great! That's how we prove that C(n, k) = C(n - 1, k) + C(n - 1, k - 1) through combinatorial counting.
Let's consider a real-world example. If you have 5 different books, and you want to choose 2 to take on a trip, how can we use Pascal's Identity?
We would write it as C(5, 2).
And how can we express this using after applying Pascal's Identity?
We can either pick one of the books to include and then pick the other from the remaining ones.
So that would be C(4, 1) + C(4, 2)!
Great! That's exactly how we apply it. Always remember to see the connection between counting strategies!
As we conclude today, who can summarize what we learned about combinatorial proofs and Pascal's Identity?
We learned that combinatorial proofs don’t involve simplifying expressions, just counting. Also, Pascal's Identity shows how to categorize combinations!
And we get C(n, k) using C(n-1, k) + C(n-1, k-1).
Excellent! Keep practicing these proofs and apply them in different contexts to solidify your understanding. See you next class!
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
This section delves into combinatorial proofs, specifically focusing on Pascal's Identity. It illustrates how two different expressions can represent the same quantity in combinatorial settings, emphasizing the importance of counting arguments without expanding algebraic expressions.
In this section, we explore the concept of combinatorial proofs, particularly focusing on Pascal's Identity, which asserts that for any non-negative integers n and k,
C(n, k) = C(n - 1, k) + C(n - 1, k - 1)
The left-hand side counts the ways to choose k objects from n objects, while the right-hand side provides two cases — choosing a specific object or not. This approach highlights a counting argument without simplifying the expressions away, staying true to the principles of combinatorics.
The proof involves recognizing that the number of k-combinations can be split into two disjoint categories, either including or excluding a specific object. By showing that both methods count the same scenarios but in different manners, we can affirm the validity of Pascal's Identity.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now let's prove an interesting combinatorial identity using combinatorial proof. This is often called as Pascal's identity. So to prove this consider a collection of n+1 objects. So I am calling those n+1 objects as say A to B they are distinct. Now what is my left-hand side expression?
C(n, k)
That denotes the total number of k-combinations I can have out of those n+1 objects. I have to pick k objects. I can do that in C(n+1, k) ways. That is the left-hand side.
This chunk introduces Pascal's identity using combinatorial proofs. We start by defining our objects. We have n+1 distinct objects, labeled A through B. The left-hand side of our identity is represented by C(n, k), which refers to the number of ways we can select k items from these n+1 objects. When we write C(n+1, k), we’re essentially stating the number of k-combinations possible from all n+1 objects.
Imagine you have a box with 6 different colored marbles (red, blue, green, yellow, purple, orange), and you want to choose 3 marbles. The left-hand side (C(6, 3)) represents all possible combinations of marbles you can select from the 6 colors.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now I have to show that the same thing can be counted by adding these 2 quantities that are there on the right-hand side. How do I do that? So my claim is that different k-combinations that I can have out of A to B can be divided into 2 groups. That will take care of the addition that we have on your right-hand-side expression. I have to somehow show that the total number of different k-combinations that I can have can be divided into 2 categories, 2 disjoint categories to be more specific and those 2 disjoint categories are the following.
This chunk explains how to approach the right-hand side of Pascal's identity. We want to group the total k-combinations into two distinct categories. This division is essential for proving that the two sides of the equation are equal. The different groupings provide a way to count the same combinations in two different ways.
If you think of the colored marbles again, we can categorize the combinations based on whether a specific color, say red, is included or not. We have one category for combinations including red (let's say you always take it), and another for those where red is not involved.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
You consider all k-combinations that you can form out of those n+1 objects where a specific object is always present. Say the object A is always present. And the number of such k-combinations is nothing but C(n, k−1). Because if the object A is always going to be included in the k objects which you are finally choosing, then you have to worry about how many ways you can pick the remaining k−1 objects out of n.
This part of the proof focuses on category 1 of our combinations. When we choose k-combinations that must include a specific object (A), we are left to select the remaining k-1 objects from the other n distinct ones. This is calculated as C(n, k-1) because we are only looking at combinations that exclude A from consideration.
Continuing with the marble example, if you always include the red marble in your selection of 3, you only need to pick 2 more from the remaining 5 colors. The number of combinations for this selection is calculated as C(5, 2).
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Whereas category 2 k-combinations are the ones where the object A is never included. And it is easy to see that the number of different k-combinations of this category is C(n, k). Because if you are not going to include A then your problem is still to choose k objects and now you are left with only n objects to choose from those k objects.
In category 2, we calculate the number of k-combinations excluding the specific object A. Since A is not included, we are only considering the remaining n objects. The k-combinations of this category can be directly counted as C(n, k), since now we have n objects and we need to choose k without any restrictions.
For our marbles, if we decide to leave out the red marble, then we only have to choose 3 colors from the remaining 5 colors. The total combinations of this scenario is C(5, 3).
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So if I sum the total number of k-combinations that I have in category 1 and the number of k-combinations that I have in category 2, that will give me the total number of k-combinations that I can have for a set consisting of n+1 objects. And that's precisely your right-hand side. And this is a combinatorial proof because now I have not expanded my left-hand side expression, I have not expanded my right-hand side expression and simplified them. I am just giving a counting argument and proving that LHS and RHS are counting the same things.
The final part of the proof shows that by adding the results from both categories, we arrive at the right-hand side of the identity. The left-hand side counts all possible k-combinations of n+1 objects, while the right-hand side sums the combinations from both categories, confirming that the counts equate.
Going back to our example with marbles, any combination of 3 marbles will either include the red one or not. When you add the combinations of both scenarios (including red versus excluding red), you have all possible ways to choose 3, precisely matching the total possible combinations for 6 distinct colors, proving the identity.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Combinatorial Proof: A method of proving identities in combinatorics based on counting.
Pascal's Identity: A fundamental relationship in combinatorics involving binomial coefficients.
Counting Arguments: Emphasizing the importance of counting in proofs rather than algebraic simplification.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
If you have 7 fruits and want to choose 3, using Pascal's Identity allows you to count the combinations by calculating C(6, 2) + C(6, 3).
In a committee of 5 people, choosing 2 can be related through the identity C(5, 2) = C(4, 1) + C(4, 2), showing the methods of selection.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
Need to count, don’t expand, choose your objects, hand in hand.
Imagine a chef choosing 3 ingredients from 6. The chef can include a special spice or not, illustrating how every choice leads to a different dish option!
Remember 'Clever Nomads Carry' to think about combinations in Pascal’s Identity: C(n, k) = C(n-1, k-1) + C(n-1, k).
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Combinatorial Proof
Definition:
A method of proving algebraic identities by counting arguments rather than simplification.
Term: Binomial Coefficient
Definition:
The coefficient that appears in the binomial theorem, denoted as C(n, k).
Term: Pascal's Identity
Definition:
States that C(n, k) = C(n - 1, k) + C(n - 1, k - 1), relating two different ways to choose items.