Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Today, we will explore the principle of inclusion-exclusion, particularly its alternate form. This method is crucial for counting elements in sets with overlapping properties. Can anyone tell me what the principle entails?
Does it mean counting the total elements and subtracting the overlaps?
Exactly! When counting, we first total the sizes of individual sets and then subtract the intersections to avoid double counting.
So, if we had three sets, we need to add back the intersection of all three, right?
Correct again! This ensures we count every element exactly once. Let's look deeper into its alternate form, where we focus on counting elements that lack specific properties.
In the alternate form, we determine how many elements do not possess properties P1, P2, ... Pn by first identifying the subsets that violate these properties.
Can you give us an example of this approach?
Sure! If we’re solving for elements in a set A that do not have property P1, we need to find set A's cardinality and then subtract the size of the union of sets that have P1, P2, etc.
What if we need to count overlapping properties?
That's where inclusion-exclusion shines! You handle overlaps by subtracting their intersections at each step. Let's practice this with a sample problem.
Let’s find the number of solutions for the equation x1 + x2 + x3 = 11 with restrictions. What would be our first step?
First, identify the universal set without any restrictions.
Precisely! Then, we define subsets that count solutions violating given constraints. How do we calculate those?
By applying the principle of inclusion-exclusion to subtract those violating properties from the total?
Correct! This method can be used in different contexts, such as counting non-onto functions. Let's try that.
Imagine we have 6 elements in set A and 3 in set B. How do we find how many onto functions exist between these sets?
We should first count all possible functions, then subtract the number of non-onto functions.
Exactly! Remember, each instance where any image isn't chosen leads to non-onto functions. This involves multiple applications of the principle!
So we need to track down every possible violation of the onto condition!
Right! Each unique function determined by available images helps us derive the required function count.
Lastly, let’s discuss derangements. What do we mean by the term 'derangement'?
It’s when no object is in its original position.
Correct! The number of ways to arrange objects while avoiding their original position is found using inclusion-exclusion. Can someone derive the formula?
I think it starts with all permutations, n!, then we subtract cases where at least one object remains in its place.
Spot on! This principle showcases the inclusion-exclusion's complexity yet strength in combinatorial cases.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The alternate form of inclusion-exclusion is a powerful tool for counting the number of elements in a set that do not have certain properties. This section discusses how to apply this principle effectively in various counting problems, including integer solutions and functions.
The principle of inclusion-exclusion is a fundamental method in combinatorics for counting the cardinality of unions of overlapping sets. This section elaborates on an alternate form, designed for scenarios where we want to count elements in a set that lack specific properties. By identifying subsets that represent elements possessing certain properties and applying inclusion-exclusion principles, we can find the cardinality of interest.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, now what we will do is, we will look into an alternate form of inclusion-exclusion which is very powerful and it is this alternate form of inclusion-exclusion which we use in varieties of problems. So, what happens in this alternate form is that we will be facing scenarios where we want to count the number of elements from a set A which has n number of elements and we will be interested to count the number of elements in this set which has none of the properties say P1, P2, P3, ..., Pn.
The alternate form of inclusion-exclusion is useful for scenarios where we want to count elements that lack certain properties. Here, we start with a set, A, that contains 'n' elements. We identify certain properties (P1, P2, ... Pn) and focus on counting how many elements do not possess any of these properties. This is different from the standard inclusion-exclusion, which typically counts how many do have certain properties.
Imagine you have a basket of fruits and you want to know how many fruits are not apples, bananas, or oranges (the properties). In this case, you'd want to use the alternate form to first find all the fruits and then subtract the ones that are apples, bananas, or oranges.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
P1, P2, P3 will be some abstract properties and we will be interested to find out the number of elements in the set A which neither have the property P1 nor the property P2, nor the property P3, and so on. So, for that what we will do is we will first identify the subset A_i consisting of elements which has property P_i.
To use the alternate form, we first define the subsets A_i, where each A_i consists of elements in set A that possess the property P_i. This means if you have properties such as being red or being round, A_1 could be all red fruits, A_2 could be all round fruits, etc. This allows us to focus our counting on those specific elements that we want to exclude.
Continuing with the fruit example, let’s say A_1 is the set of red fruits, A_2 is the set of round fruits, etc. By identifying these subsets, we can better understand which fruits to exclude when counting how many are neither red nor round.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
And if I take the union of the subsets A1 to An, I get all the elements in the set A which has either the property P1 or the property P2 or the property P3 or so on. That means it will have at least one of the properties P1 to Pn; but that is not what we want.
The union of the subsets A1 to An represents all elements that have at least one of the specified properties (P1 to Pn). However, our goal is to count elements that do NOT have any of these properties. Thus, finding the union helps identify which elements to exclude from our total count.
If we think of it as a collection of fruits again, the union of A1 to An gives us all fruits that are red, round, etc. But what we want is to see all fruits that aren't any of those. It's like first gathering all the items we don't want and then figuring out how many are left in the original set.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now the desired answer or the number of elements which do not have any of the properties P1 to Pn will be the difference of the cardinality of A which is n and the unique cardinality of the union of n sets.
To find how many elements do not have any of the properties, we take the total count of elements in set A (which is n) and subtract the count of elements that have at least one of the properties (the cardinality of the union of the A_i). This means performing the operation n - |A1 ∪ A2 ∪ ... ∪ An|, where |...| denotes the number of elements.
In our fruit example, if we start with 10 fruits in total and collect that there are 4 fruits that are either red, round, or any other property, we subtract: 10 - 4 = 6. This means there are 6 fruits that are neither red nor round.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now we will apply the rule of inclusion-exclusion to find out the cardinality of the union of the n sets because we know how to find that.
The next step involves employing the inclusion-exclusion principle to compute |A1 ∪ A2 ∪ ... ∪ An|. This principle allows us to add and subtract the cardinalities of the various subsets to eliminate overlap accurately. The general idea is to start by adding the sizes of each individual subset, then deducting sizes of pairwise intersections, adding sizes of triple intersections, and so forth.
Imagine again with our fruit problem: if we counted the red fruits, round fruits, and then backtracked to exclude the overlaps, we could precisely calculate how many fruits fit at least one property without double counting any. It's like making a checklist for each color and shape while ensuring you don’t mark any fruit twice due to overlapping categories.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Principal of Inclusion-Exclusion: A foundational principle in combinatorics for counting elements in overlapping sets.
Alternate Form of Inclusion-Exclusion: A method focusing on counting elements without certain properties using the original principle.
Derangements: Arrangements in which no element appears in its original position.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
Counting integer solutions to equations with constraints using the alternate form of inclusion-exclusion.
Determining non-onto functions between two sets using the principle.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
To count them right, avoid the overlap plight, Inclusion for good measure, Exclusion with pleasure.
D = Displace. Think displacing items to avoid their original spot in derangements.
Imagine a party where no one gets their own coat back. This is the essence of derangements!
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: InclusionExclusion Principle
Definition:
A principle used to calculate the size of the union of multiple sets by adding sizes of individual sets and subtracting sizes of their intersections.
Term: Alternate Form of InclusionExclusion
Definition:
A method of counting elements in a set that do not possess certain properties by using the principle's logic.
Term: Derangement
Definition:
A permutation of elements such that none of the elements appear in their original position.
Term: Universal Set
Definition:
The set that includes all elements under consideration for a particular problem.