Counting Solutions to an Equation
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Interactive Audio Lesson
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Introduction to the Principle of Inclusion-Exclusion
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
Today, we're going to learn about the Principle of Inclusion-Exclusion, which helps us count elements in overlapping sets effectively.
How does it help us count elements in both sets?
Great question! When we count the elements of set A and set B without considering overlaps, we double count the elements present in both. We subtract the intersection to correct this.
So, if I have 2 sets, it’s like this: if I count A and add B, I subtract the overlap?
Exactly, and if we have three sets, we need to do more adjustments. What do you think we should do next?
We might need to add intersections for multiple sets!
Yes! For three sets, we subtract the pairwise intersections, and then add back the intersection of all three sets. Let's summarize this!
Extending PIE to n Sets
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
Now, let's consider n sets. The formula alternates between additions and subtractions of cardinalities. Can anyone summarize how that works?
We add the individual sizes and subtract intersection sizes in pairs, right?
Excellent! This continues as we include triplets and higher intersections. For n sets, this complexity grows, but the structure remains the same.
So for 4 sets, we add four individual counts, then subtract three pairwise counts, and continue adding for triples?
Exactly! And by proving any element's count, we can ensure each element contributes just once.
Application of PIE: Counting Solutions to Equations
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
Let’s apply these ideas to count solutions to the equation $$x_1 + x_2 + x_3 = 11$$ with some restrictions.
What kind of restrictions?
For example, let's say $$0 ≤ x_1 ≤ 3$$, $$0 ≤ x_2 ≤ 4$$, and $$0 ≤ x_3 ≤ 6$$. This means we need counting methods that consider these upper bounds.
How can I visualize this?
Imagine modeling this with different combinations using our PIE method! We compute the total unrestricted solutions and then subtract those that violate the conditions.
So are we really accounting the intersections of conditions that exceed our bounds?
Exactly! Each violation must be carefully calculated. Understanding the base solution helps.
Complex Countings: Non-Onto Functions and Derangements
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
Now, let’s look at non-onto functions. How would we find onto functions from a larger set to a smaller set?
Are we looking to avoid functions that skip elements?
Absolutely! We define sets that exclude a single element and apply PIE to count these exclusions. Can someone write down how we might do this?
We will calculate the total possible mappings, then subtract the mappings that don’t cover all elements!
You got it! This also extends to derangements—can anyone define a derangement?
A derangement is a permutation where no element appears in its original position!
Right! By using the same principles of PIE, we can count valid derangements. Let’s recap today’s concepts.
Introduction & Overview
Read summaries of the section's main ideas at different levels of detail.
Quick Overview
Standard
The Principle of Inclusion-Exclusion is a method used in combinatorics to count the number of elements in the union of multiple sets. This section explores its application to counting solutions to equations, specifically through examples involving restrictions on the variables.
Detailed
Detailed Summary
In this section, we introduce the Principle of Inclusion-Exclusion (PIE), a fundamental principle in combinatorics used for counting the number of elements in the union of several sets. The principle can be illustrated with 2 sets using the formula:
- $$|A ext{ U } B| = |A| + |B| - |A ext{ ∩ } B|$$
This addresses the overcount that occurs when two sets overlap. Extending this principle, we can calculate for 3 sets:
- $$|A ext{ U } B ext{ U } C| = |A| + |B| + |C| - |A ext{ ∩ } B| - |A ext{ ∩ } C| - |B ext{ ∩ } C| + |A ext{ ∩ } B ext{ ∩ } C|$$
For n sets, the formula evolves into a more complex structure that alternates between additions and subtractions across intersections of the sets. The section emphasizes the importance of PIE through examples involving counting integer solutions to equations under specific constraints. This includes calculating the number of solutions for the equation $$x_1 + x_2 + x_3 = 11$$ with upper limits for each variable. The use of PIE not only provides the total count of permissible solutions but also addresses more complex scenarios like non-onto functions and derangements, highlighting the versatility of PIE in solving combinatorial problems.
Youtube Videos
Audio Book
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Overview of Counting Solutions
Chapter 1 of 5
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
Suppose we want to find out the number of solutions for this equation: x + x + x = 11; number of integer solutions. And my restrictions are x should be in the range 0 to 3, x should be in the range 0 to 4 and x should be in the range 0 to 6. Now using the methods that we have seen till now we cannot find it directly.
Detailed Explanation
In this chunk, we introduce a specific equation we need to solve, which is x1 + x2 + x3 = 11, with certain restrictions on the values of x1, x2, and x3. Each variable can only take on certain values (0 to 3 for x1, 0 to 4 for x2, and 0 to 6 for x3). Due to these restrictions, directly calculating the number of solutions becomes complex, which is why we need to employ alternative methods, specifically the inclusion-exclusion principle.
Examples & Analogies
Imagine you are dividing the tasks of cleaning a room among three friends. Each friend can only clean a certain part (Friend 1 can only clean up to 3 corners, Friend 2 can clean up to 4 corners, and Friend 3 can clean up to 6). You need to figure out how to divide the overall task (11 corners) so that no one exceeds their limit. This setup parallels the equation we need to solve, where finding a satisfactory arrangement is challenging because of the restrictions.
Establishing the Universal Set
Chapter 2 of 5
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
But what we will do is the following: we will use the alternate form of inclusion-exclusion. So, we will first find out the cardinality of the universal set. Universal set in this context will be the set of all solutions where I do not put any restrictions on x1, x2, x3.
Detailed Explanation
Here, the 'universal set' is defined as all possible solutions to the equation x1 + x2 + x3 = 11 without any restrictions. This means we can have solutions where the values of x1, x2, and x3 can be anything, even above their specified limits. By calculating the number of options in this unrestricted scenario, we can better understand our total potential solutions before applying restrictions.
Examples & Analogies
Continuing with our cleaning analogy, think of the universal set as if there were no limits on how many corners each friend could clean. If you ask them to clean as many corners as they like to reach a total of 11 corners, all kinds of combinations could happen, helping you find out all possible ways to reach that target.
Defining Properties and Violations
Chapter 3 of 5
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
Now let me define a set A to be the set of solutions for this equation where x1 is greater than 3. So, now you see your property P was that your solution should not have x1 more than 3.
Detailed Explanation
In this step, we start defining specific properties for our solution sets. For example, Set A contains all the solutions where x1 exceeds its upper limit of 3. This introduction of property P (where x1 should be less than or equal to 3) allows us to explore the idea of counting the solutions which violate this defined condition. By examining these violations, we can better utilize inclusion-exclusion to find valid solutions.
Examples & Analogies
Using our earlier analogy, this step is similar to identifying a problematic situation—like if one friend (Friend 1) decides to clean more corners than they are supposed to (over 3 corners). Understanding this violation helps in structuring the task better to keep everyone within limits.
Calculating Violations and Totals
Chapter 4 of 5
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
In fact, we can also say that my property P is that my solution x2 should be strictly less than or equal to 4. But now I try to find out solutions which violate the property P namely solutions where x2 is definitely greater than 4.
Detailed Explanation
This chunk extends the idea of defining properties by stating that property P now also applies to x2, and we want to find violations where x2 is greater than its maximum limit of 4. This systematic identification of violations for multiple variables (x1, x2, x3) allows us to comprehensively cover all cases needed for the inclusion-exclusion principle.
Examples & Analogies
This is like setting a clear guideline for our friends—where each must stick to their limits—then investigating situations where they accidentally exceed those. Understanding how often they might 'over-clean' helps ensure everyone stays within their designated projects.
Finding Total Valid Solutions Using Inclusion-Exclusion
Chapter 5 of 5
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
And now it is easy to see that my overall solution the number of overall solutions will be the difference of the cardinality of the universal set which is 78 and the union of the sets A, A, and A.
Detailed Explanation
In this concluding chunk, we finalize our approach using inclusion-exclusion by calculating the total number of valid solutions. The valid solution count comes from subtracting the number of violating solutions (the union of sets A, A, and A) from the total solutions found in the universal set. This gives us a clear total of all acceptable solution combinations that adhere to the original restrictions.
Examples & Analogies
Imagine after identifying all potential cleaning arrangements, we conclude by negating the arrangements that went over each friend's limits. The successful arrangements that match with all set expectations now represent the solutions to our cleaning task.
Key Concepts
-
Inclusion-Exclusion Principle: A key method that allows us to calculate the count of elements in overlapping sets.
-
Venn Diagrams: Visual representations that aid in understanding and applying the inclusion-exclusion principle.
-
Integer Solutions: Solutions of equations where variables must be whole numbers, under constraints.
-
Derangements: Special arrangements of elements where none return to their original position.
Examples & Applications
Counting solutions to $$x_1 + x_2 + x_3 = 11$$ with restrictions $$0 ≤ x_1 ≤ 3$$, $$0 ≤ x_2 ≤ 4$$, $$0 ≤ x_3 ≤ 6$$.
Finding the number of onto functions from a set of 6 elements to 3 elements using PIE to exclude non-onto cases.
Memory Aids
Interactive tools to help you remember key concepts
Rhymes
Count, recount, don't forget that overlaps can cause regret!
Stories
Imagine a dinner party where guests double RSVP. Use the inclusion-exclusion principle to avoid placing too many chairs!
Memory Tools
Use the acronym 'SADD' (Sum - Add - Double - Divide) to remember the alternation in PIE.
Acronyms
PIE
Principle of Inclusion-Exclusion.
Flash Cards
Glossary
- Principle of InclusionExclusion
A formula used to find the cardinality of the union of multiple sets by accounting for overlaps.
- Cardinality
The number of elements in a set.
- Venn Diagram
A diagram that shows all possible logical relations between a finite collection of sets.
- Derangement
A permutation of elements where none appear in their original positions.
- NonOnto Function
A function that does not map every element in the codomain to at least one element in the domain.
Reference links
Supplementary resources to enhance your learning experience.