Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Today, we will explore the intriguing world of computable and uncomputable functions. Can anyone tell me what a computable function is?
I think it's a function where a computer can calculate the output for any input using a program.
Exactly! A computable function has a corresponding computer program for every input that produces an output. Now, what do you think an uncomputable function might be?
Is it a function that a computer can't compute at all?
Correct! An uncomputable function cannot be computed by any program, no matter how much time or memory we provide. Let's remember this with the acronym 'UNG' for Uncomputable = No Good program. Now, why do you think this distinction is important?
Maybe because it shows the limits of computers?
That's right! It highlights the intrinsic limits of computation. Great discussion everyone!
Now that we've defined the concepts, let's move into the proof of existence for uncomputable functions. What do you remember about countable sets?
Countable sets can be listed or enumerated even if they are infinite.
Exactly! We know the set of all valid programs is countable. Now, let's compare this to the set of all functions from positive integers to a finite set, say {0,1,2,...,9}. Can anyone guess which is bigger?
The set of functions must be larger!
Correct! This leads us to a key conclusion. Even though we can list all programs, there are more functions than programs. This means some functions cannot be matched with any program, and hence, they are uncomputable. Let’s remember: Programs are countable but 'Functions Forever Unwritten!'
That's a catchy phrase! It helps me remember the difference.
We touched upon the idea of non-constructive proofs earlier. Who can explain what this means?
It’s when you prove something exists without actually showing an example.
That's right! In our case, we prove that at least one uncomputable function exists without giving a specific example. This method relies heavily on logic and set theory. Can anyone tell me why this approach is used so often in mathematics?
Because sometimes, finding a specific example is too difficult or impossible!
Exactly! Sometimes it's more about proving existence than finding a specific case. Keep this essence to heart as we delve deeper into computability!
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The section explains computable functions, defined as those for which a computer program can be created to compute their output for every possible input. It also discusses the significance of uncomputable functions, illustrating their existence through a comparison of the countability of valid programs versus the set of all functions from positive integers to a finite set.
In this section, we delve into the distinction between computable and uncomputable functions. A function is deemed computable if there exists a computer program capable of producing its output for all possible inputs. In contrast, uncomputable functions cannot be computed by any program, regardless of resources such as time and memory. To prove the existence of uncomputable functions, we rely on the concept of countability.
We establish that while the set of valid programs is countable, the set of all possible functions from the set of positive integers to a finite set (like {0, ..., 9}) is uncountable. By demonstrating an injective mapping from the set of real numbers between 0 and 1 to this set of functions, we conclude that there are more functions than programs, confirming the existence of uncomputable functions. This essential insight reminds us of the limitations of computation, illustrating that not all tasks can be automated by computers.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Hello everyone, welcome to this lecture so just a quick recap; in the last lecture we discussed about Cantor’s diagonalization argument. And we saw examples of uncountable sets; the plan for this lecture is as follows. We will discuss about computable and uncomputable functions and we will discuss about the existence of uncomputable functions.
This introduction sets the stage for the lecture by briefly reviewing what was covered previously. It highlights the transition from Cantor's diagonalization argument and uncountable sets to the main focus of the current lecture: computable versus uncomputable functions. The lecturer prepares the audience for an exploration into the nature of functions that can and cannot be computed.
Consider a library filled with books where each book represents a different function. Just like some books are written in languages that can only be understood by certain people (computable functions), there are others that are written in languages no one can understand, regardless of their literacy (uncomputable functions).
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So what exactly are uncomputable functions; so they are some special type of functions. So say I have function f defined from a set X to a set Y then I will call the function f to be computable if there exists some computer program in a programming language which can compute or give you the value of this function for every possible input from the domain of that function.
A computable function is defined as one for which a computer program can be created to compute its value for every input in its domain. The emphasis is on the existence of such a program rather than its efficiency or resource usage. If no program can be constructed for a certain function, that function is classified as uncomputable.
Think of a vending machine that offers a variety of snacks. If you can press a button for any snack and the vending machine will always dispense it (computable function), it's reliable. However, if there is no button for your desired snack and the machine cannot produce it, then it's akin to an uncomputable function—it simply cannot fulfill that request.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So what we now want to prove is that there indeed exists uncomputable function that means it does not matter how much resources time and memory space you provide. And write down a program there always exist some function such that you cannot write down a program respective of resources allowed to compute the output of that function for every possible input.
The speaker intends to prove the existence of uncomputable functions, stating that no matter how much time or resources are allocated, certain functions cannot be computed by any program. This leads into a deeper exploration of the limitations of computational power.
Imagine a magical task that requires solving a riddle that no person has ever cracked. No matter how intelligent or resourceful they are, they simply cannot find the answer. This reflects uncomputability—it highlights the limits of what can actually be achieved, even with the best resources at hand.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So we will begin with some known fact; so just recall that in one of our earlier lectures we proved that the set of all valid programs in any programming language is countable. That means we can enumerate them even though they are infinitely many valid programs.
The lecturer points out that, based on previous discussions, the collection of valid programs that can be written in programming languages is countable, meaning we can enumerate or list them, even though there are infinitely many. This sets the stage for the argument that there are functions beyond the scope of these programs.
Think of counting the number of books in a library where every book has a unique title—this is akin to enumerating programs. However, just because we can list the books does not mean that they cover every story or topic that exists.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
We will prove that the cardinality of this collection of all possible functions is not א0 that is what we are going to prove. That means what we are going to show is that we have more functions than the number of possible programs.
The objective here is to demonstrate that there are more functions mapping positive integers to integers than there are valid programs. The speaker will establish that the set of all possible functions is uncountable, significantly exceeding the countable set of valid programs.
If you imagine a scenario with a set of recipes, where each recipe corresponds to a function, and the number of ingredients represents the programs, there are infinitely more ways to mix and match ingredients than there are recipes themselves. This analogy illustrates the idea of having more potential functions than can be represented by a finite number of recipes.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
This is the set of all real numbers between [0,1) including 0 that is why you have the square bracket within 0 but excluding one. So this set is already known to be uncountable what we will show is, we will show an injective mapping from this set to the collection calligraphic F.
The proof aims to demonstrate an injective mapping from the uncountable set of real numbers in the range [0,1) to the collection of functions, thereby establishing that the collection of possible functions is also uncountable. Since the set of real numbers is known to be uncountable, this proves the same for the function set.
Think of assigning a unique address to every house on a street. An injective mapping ensures that no two houses share the same address—just like how two different real numbers translate to two different functions. This process illustrates the concept of injective mappings in a concrete manner.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So that is why clearly this function is an injective function. So we have shown here that indeed the set of all possible functions from the set of positive integers to the set {0,…,9} is an uncountable set.
With the completion of the proof, it is confirmed that the set of all possible functions from positive integers to the digit set is uncountable. This finding concludes that there are indeed more functions than valid programs, hence proving the existence of uncomputable functions.
Consider a vast network of routes in a city; there are numerous possible paths (functions) from point A to B that are not depicted on the city map (valid programs). Just as these paths exist but remain untraced, uncomputable functions exist beyond the reach of any programming language.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
And hence here are some functions for which you do not have a corresponding matching program and that is why you do have uncomputable functions that exist.
The existence of uncomputable functions signifies the limitations of computation and algorithms. It suggests that there are computational tasks that cannot be solved no matter the resources at hand, reshaping our understanding of computer science capabilities.
Imagine if there were tasks where a manual cannot guide you, like figuring out a relationship puzzle with no startling insights despite all the clues. This reflects the nature of uncomputable functions—there are inherent limits to what can be solved algorithmically.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Computable Functions: Functions that can be computed by a corresponding program.
Uncomputable Functions: Functions that lack any computable program to compute their outputs.
Countability: A property of a set that can be enumerated, highlighting different levels of infinity.
Non-constructive Proofs: Proving the existence of an object without constructing it.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
A simple computable function: f(x) = x + 1, which can be computed for every input.
An example of an uncomputable function is the Halting problem, which determines whether a given program will stop running.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
Computable functions, they play by the rules; without a program, uncomputables are fools.
Imagine a librarian trying to list every possible book. Some books can never be listed, just like uncomputable functions exist beyond our grasp.
Remember 'C-U' for Computable-Usable and Uncomputable-Utilized functions.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Computable Function
Definition:
A function for which there exists a program that can compute the output for every possible input.
Term: Uncomputable Function
Definition:
A function that cannot be computed by any algorithm or program, regardless of resource allocation.
Term: Countable Set
Definition:
A set that can be enumerated, even if infinite, such as the set of valid programs.
Term: Nonconstructive Proof
Definition:
A proof that establishes the existence of a mathematical object without providing a concrete example.