Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Welcome class! Today, we're diving into Fermat's Little Theorem. Can anyone tell me what the theorem states about prime numbers?
I think it says something about how a number raised to a power gives a specific result when divided by a prime.
Exactly! Specifically, if p is a prime and a is an integer not divisible by p, we have a^(p-1) ≡ 1 (mod p). This is a crucial theorem in number theory!
Why is it important in primality testing?
Great question! We use it to test if a number is prime by checking if for a co-prime integer b, b^(n-1) ≡ 1 (mod n). If it fails, n is composite.
Now, let's consider how we use this theorem in practice. Suppose we want to check if n is prime.
Do we just pick any number co-prime to n?
Exactly! For instance, choose a base b. We then compute if b^(n-1) ≡ 1 (mod n).
What if it gives us that result?
If it does, we can't be sure n is prime yet—it's also possible that n is a pseudo prime.
Moving on, let's discuss Carmichael numbers. Who can give me an example?
Isn't 561 a Carmichael number?
Indeed! 561 is a composite number but satisfies Fermat's condition for all bases co-prime to it.
So, does that mean we can't trust Fermat's theorem for primality testing?
Exactly! It highlights the limitations of relying solely on this theorem for true primality testing.
Given the existence of Carmichael numbers, what do you think we need to do to improve our primality tests?
We should have more than one test, right?
Yes! We need to incorporate additional tests to confirm the primality of n, not solely rely on Fermat's theorem.
What kinds of tests can we use?
Other methods like the Miller-Rabin test are more reliable for confirming the primality.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
Fermat's Little Theorem serves as a foundational principle in number theory, particularly in primality testing. The theorem states that if p is a prime and a is an integer not divisible by p, then a^(p-1) ≡ 1 (mod p). The section also discusses the limitations of this theorem highlighted by Carmichael numbers, which are composite numbers that can mistakenly appear prime under Fermat's criterion.
Fermat's Little Theorem states that for a prime number p and an integer a which is co-prime to p, it holds that a^(p-1) ≡ 1 (mod p). This theorem is significant in number theory and has practical applications in primality testing.
To test whether a number n is prime, we can randomly choose an integer b co-prime to n and verify if b^(n-1) ≡ 1 (mod n). If this condition is false, then n is declared composite. However, if it's true, n could either be prime or a composite number known as a pseudo prime. One notable example of a pseudo prime is 341, which is composite but satisfies Fermat's condition for certain bases.
Carmichael numbers are composite numbers that fulfill the theorem's requirements for all bases co-prime to them, rendering them indistinguishable from primes under this testing framework. An example of a Carmichael number is 561, which proves to be a pseudo prime regardless of the base selected. This reveals significant limitations in the reliance on Fermat's Little Theorem for primality testing and suggests the need for additional testing methods.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now, as I said at the beginning of the lecture Fermat's little theorem also forms the basis of very interesting primality testing algorithm. We would not be seeing the full primality testing algorithm, but we will see a part of it. This is the statement of the Fermat's little theorem, which says that if you have a number p which is prime and an integer a; if you have an integer a which is co-prime to p, then for every such integer a, the value of ap - 1 ≡ 1 modulo p.
Fermat's Little Theorem is a significant principle in number theory that applies to prime numbers. It states that for any prime number p and any integer a that is coprime to p, the equation a^(p-1) ≡ 1 (mod p) holds true. In practical terms, this means that if you take any integer that shares no common factors with a prime number (other than 1), raise it to the power of one less than that prime number, and divide by the prime, you will always get a remainder of 1. This theorem is fundamental as it paves the way for algorithms that test the primality of numbers, providing a way to check if a number is prime by testing this condition.
Think of Fermat's Little Theorem as a rule in a club where only members with a special badge (the coprime numbers) are allowed to enter. If you have this badge (a number that's coprime to a prime p), then no matter how many times you loop the door (raise it to the power of p-1), you'll always end up at the same spot (1), indicating that you belong there. This is a simple yet powerful rule that can help you quickly check if others belong (whether a number is prime or not).
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So now the question is can I use the theorems statement to check whether a given number n is prime or not, of course, the number n has to be odd, because if I give you n = 2 you can easily verify, you can easily conclude that it is a prime number because that is the only even prime number. But other than that if at all n is a prime number it has to be odd. So now, you are given an odd prime number, it might be an arbitrary large prime number and you want to utilize Fermat's little theorem to verify whether the given number is prime or not.
To test if a number n is prime using Fermat's theorem, you would pick a random integer b that is coprime to n. If b^(n-1) ≡ 1 (mod n), then n might be prime. However, if this condition does not hold, n is definitely composite. This method, while useful, has limitations. A number can meet this condition even if it is not prime (like composite numbers called pseudoprimes), thus making it unreliable as a guaranteed test for primality.
Imagine you're using a simple test to check if a person is trustworthy (prime). You decide to ask them a question (use the number b) that trustworthy people (prime numbers) would answer correctly. If they give the right answer (b^(n-1) ≡ 1 mod n), they might be trustworthy, but you can't be completely sure because untrustworthy people (composite numbers) might also know the answer. Therefore, while this test is a good start, it needs more checks to be truly reliable.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
However, it turns out that even if you do so, your primality testing algorithm will fail because there are some very interesting numbers which are called as pseudo primes and Carmichael numbers, which will cause your primality testing algorithm to fail for the case when your n is composite, but you are not able to detect that.
Both pseudoprimes and Carmichael numbers present significant challenges in primality testing. A pseudoprime behaves like a prime for specific bases in Fermat's theorem but is not actually prime. Carmichael numbers are worse; they pass the test for every base that is coprime to them, thus misleading any primality test based on Fermat's theorem. Therefore, simply relying on Fermat's Little Theorem can lead to incorrect conclusions about the primality of a number.
Consider a dedicated actor who can convincingly play the role of a superhero (pseudoprime), fooling the audience only certain times. Now, imagine an even more deceptive actor (Carmichael number) who always plays the role perfectly regardless of the context, making it impossible to tell they are not a hero (prime). In both scenarios, without deeper investigation, one could easily be misled into thinking that they are indeed heroes.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So now, you might be wondering, do Carmichael numbers indeed exist? And if they exist, are they finite? Or are they infinite in number? So, indeed, it turns out that we have lots of Carmichael numbers. In fact, the study of Carmichael numbers itself is a very interesting research topic in number theory.
Carmichael numbers are composite numbers that behave like primes under Fermat's Little Theorem for all bases that are coprime to them. One notable Carmichael number is 561, which can be proven to satisfy Fermat's conditions for every base. The existence of these numbers and their properties is a rich area of study in number theory, exploring how they evade simple checks for primality.
Think of Carmichael numbers as the ultimate con artist in a heist movie. They've mastered every trick and technique to appear innocent and escape detection by all investigative methods (Fermat's test). Just like the cleverest of thieves can slip through the most secure systems, these numbers can pass primality tests that are designed to catch composite numbers, showcasing the intricate challenges in verifying true identity (primality).
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Fermat's Little Theorem: Indicates that for any prime p, if a is co-prime to p, then a^(p-1) ≡ 1 mod p.
Primality Testing using Fermat's Theorem: A method to test if a number is prime by checking b^(n-1) ≡ 1 mod n.
Carmichael Numbers: Special composite numbers that appear prime under Fermat's theorem.
Pseudo Primes: Composite numbers that satisfy Fermat's condition for certain bases.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
If n = 7 (a prime number) and a = 3, then using Fermat's Little Theorem: 3^(6) ≡ 1 (mod 7).
The number 341 is an example of a pseudo prime because 2^(340) ≡ 1 (mod 341), although it is composite.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
If p is prime, then do not fear, a power of a, you’ll see it clear, raised to p-1 with a perfect cheer, equals one, that’s what we hold dear.
Imagine a kingdom called Fermatia ruled by a wise King Prime. All leaders (numbers) must follow the rule—if they can raise their strength to the total knights minus one without losing to their foes (the modulus), they are considered strong (prime). However, some imposters like the cunning Carmichael sneak past the gates! They seem strong but are not really true heroes.
Remember: F is for Fermat, P for Prime, C for Carmichael - not a number you want to climb!
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Fermat's Little Theorem
Definition:
A theorem stating that if p is a prime and a is an integer not divisible by p, then a^(p-1) ≡ 1 (mod p).
Term: Primality Testing
Definition:
The process of determining whether a given number is prime.
Term: Carmichael Numbers
Definition:
Composite numbers that satisfy Fermat's Little Theorem for every base that is co-prime to them.
Term: Pseudo Primes
Definition:
Composite numbers that satisfy the condition b^(n-1) ≡ 1 (mod n) for some base b co-prime to n.