Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Welcome class! Today we will explore Fermat's Little Theorem, which states: if **p** is a prime number and **a** is an integer not divisible by **p**, then **a^(p-1) ≡ 1 (mod p)**. Can anyone tell me why this theorem is significant?
I think it helps with primality testing because it gives a rule we can follow!
Exactly! It's crucial in testing whether numbers are prime. To remember this theorem, think of the phrase 'powers of a and primes play nicely.'
What if **p** divides **a**?
Good question! There’s a corollary that says if **p** divides **a**, then **a^p ≡ a (mod p)**. This means we can extend Fermat's Little Theorem to all integers, not just coprime ones.
Now, let’s delve into the proof of Fermat's Little Theorem. Can anyone summarize why we assume **a** is coprime to **p**?
So that we can ensure no division by zero occurs?
Exactly! We start by taking the first **p-1** multiples of **a**. Who can explain what we need to show with these multiples?
We need to prove that these multiples give distinct, non-zero remainders when divided by **p**!
Right! If they give distinct remainders, we can then apply the properties of modular arithmetic to show our final result using multiplication.
Now, how can we use Fermat's theorem in applications? Who wants to tackle an example?
We can use it to compute large powers modulo a prime!
Exactly! For example, to compute **7222 mod 11**, we can break this down using **7^(10) ≡ 1 (mod 11)**. What do we end up with?
We break it down! So, we get **1² * 72 ≡ 5 mod 11**, right?
Spot on! Using Fermat’s theorem simplifies computations significantly. Remember, simplification is key!
As we’ve seen, Fermat's theorem has a limitation. Let's discuss Carmichael numbers. Who can explain what they are?
They are composite numbers that satisfy Fermat’s theorem for any base that's coprime to them.
Correct! This means they can fool primality tests. For instance, if we test **341** with base **2**, it falsely appears prime. What’s our takeaway from this?
Not all numbers that pass our test are prime!
Exactly again! We must be cautious and remember that more tests are required.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
Fermat's Little Theorem states that if p is a prime and a is an integer not divisible by p, then a^(p-1) ≡ 1 (mod p). This section discusses the theorem and its applications in primality testing while highlighting the exceptions presented by Carmichael numbers, which can complicate primality determination.
Fermat's Little Theorem is a foundational principle in number theory that articulates a relationship between prime numbers and modular arithmetic. It asserts that for a prime number p and an integer a, where p does not divide a, the expression a^(p-1) ≡ 1 (mod p) holds true. This theorem plays a significant role in testing the primality of numbers, which is essential in fields like cryptography.
The section further delves into a corollary of the theorem which states that if p divides a, then a^p ≡ a (mod p) for any integer a. This provides a broader context for utilizing Fermat's Theorem beyond coprime integers.
Importantly, though the theorem can aid in primality testing, certain composite numbers, known as Carmichael numbers, exhibit properties that can mislead primality tests based on this theorem. Carmichael numbers satisfy b^(n - 1) ≡ 1 (mod n) for every integer b that is coprime to n, making them appear prime under Fermat's conditions despite being composite. This highlights a critical limitation in using Fermat’s Little Theorem as a definitive test for primality. The discussion concludes with an emphasis on the need for caution in these tests to avoid false positives produced by Carmichael numbers.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Hello everyone, welcome to this lecture, so the plan for this lecture is as follows: in this lecture, we will discuss about Fermat's little theorem, and we will see its application to primality testing, and we will also discuss about Carmichael numbers.
The introduction establishes the main topics of the lecture: Fermat's Little Theorem, its role in testing for prime numbers (primality testing), and the exploration of Carmichael numbers, which are special composite numbers that can mislead primality tests.
Think of a cooking class where the chef introduces the three main dishes (topics) that they will prepare together. Just as knowing what you will make helps you understand the cooking process, knowing these concepts prepares you for how they connect to one another.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So let us begin with Fermat's little theorem so, the theorem says that, if p is a prime number and if a is an integer such that p does not divide a. So, this notation means does not divide: ∤, in other words, a is co-prime to p, then the theorem says that ap - 1 ≡ 1 modulo p.
Fermat's Little Theorem provides a relationship between a prime number p and an integer a (which is not divisible by p). The theorem states that if you raise a to the power of (p-1) and divide it by p, the remainder will be 1. This theorem is foundational in number theory and useful for computations involving large numbers.
Imagine you have a coupon that gives you a deal every time you spend in increments of $p. If you spend $a (which is not a multiple of the coupon value), after $p-1 worth of spending, you'll effectively get a 'reward' back as if you had spent $1 more, which highlights the power of Fermat's theorem in predictable outcomes.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So assume for the moment that this theorem statement is true, let us see an interesting corollary. So, the corollary is ap ≡ a modulo p for every integer a and prime p.
The corollary states that for any integer a, the result of raising a to the power of p will have the same remainder when divided by p as a itself. This broadens the applicability of Fermat's Little Theorem beyond just integers co-prime to p.
Consider borrowing a book from a library (p) with a condition that if you return it after p weeks (p), you don't owe any late fees. Even after extending your borrowing period (raising a to the power of p), you are still only charged as if you had just borrowed it (a).
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
We can divide the proof into cases so, the corollary is for every integer it is not only for those integers a which are co-prime to p, whereas the Fermat's little theorem is strictly for those integers a which are co-prime to p.
The proof is structured in two cases: one where p divides a, and one where it does not. When p divides a, the statement holds because both a and ap will be divisible by p, resulting in the same remainder of 0. In the other case, we apply Fermat's theorem directly, leading to the conclusion.
Imagine checking off your list of chores. If the chore (a) is due today (p), both the chore itself and its completion (ap) relate back to today (0 remainder). If you finish ahead of schedule, you still relate back to your original list, satisfying the theorem's claim.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now, as I said at the beginning of the lecture Fermat's little theorem also forms the basis of very interesting primality testing algorithm.
Fermat's Little Theorem is applied in algorithms to test for prime numbers. By choosing a base a, we can determine if a number n is likely prime based on whether an equation derived from the theorem holds true.
Think of a detective examining a suspect (n). If evidence (a) corroborates that the suspect behaves as a prime character (shows expected traits), we might be led to believe they are innocent (prime). But absence of evidence could very well confirm guilt (composite).
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
However, it turns out that even if you do so, your primality testing algorithm will fail because there are some very interesting numbers which are called as pseudo primes and Carmichael numbers.
Primality tests based on Fermat's theorem can fail because of special composite numbers known as Carmichael numbers. Despite meeting the conditions of the theorem, these numbers can mislead tests, making them appear prime.
Imagine a well-made disguise that allows someone to trick you into thinking they are royalty (prime). The disguise may look perfect under certain lighting or angles, but upon closer inspection, the truth reveals they are just an actor (composite).
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, what exactly are Carmichael numbers, so, they are composite numbers, which are pseudo primes with respect to every base that you can think of.
Carmichael numbers are composite numbers that satisfy Fermat's Little Theorem for every integer a that is co-prime to the number. They behave like primes in that they confirm the theorem's condition, yet they are not actually prime.
Imagine a magician performing tricks that consistently fool the audience into believing he is a powerful wizard (prime). Despite his powerful appearances and illusions, he is just a skilled performer hiding the truth of his identity (composite).
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So my claim is that 561 is a Carmichael number. So, you can see that 561 is not a prime number.
561 is indeed a Carmichael number, confirmed through its ability to meet the congruence relation specified by Fermat's theorem for all bases that are co-prime to it. Testing any such base will yield the result consistent with a prime even though it is not.
Imagine a known actor visiting schools to impart 'wisdom' (Carmichael), earning everyone's trust for their insights, although behind the scenes, they are merely reading from prepared notes without true knowledge (composite).
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Fermat's Little Theorem: A foundational theorem linking primes and modular arithmetic.
Primality Testing: A crucial application of Fermat's theorem for identifying prime numbers.
Carmichael Numbers: Special composite numbers that pass certain primality tests.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
Using Fermat's theorem, to compute 7222 mod 11, break it down to 7^10 mod 11, which is 1. Thus, 7222 mod 11 is 5.
The number 341 is a Carmichael number; it can pass tests for various bases, misleading them to think it's prime.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
For every prime p, let a be free. When a’s not a divisor, it’s congruent with glee.
In a kingdom where only primes are allowed, the little a always danced happily, never divided by the great p, proving its prowess every time.
PAP-1: P means Prime, A means a coprime integer, and P-1 indicates the exponent in the theorem.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Fermat's Little Theorem
Definition:
If p is a prime and a is an integer not divisible by p, then a^(p-1) ≡ 1 (mod p).
Term: Primality Testing
Definition:
A method for determining whether a number is prime.
Term: Carmichael Numbers
Definition:
Composite numbers that satisfy Fermat's theorem for every base coprime to them.