Practice X-Frame-Options - 1.4.4 | 6. Security and Best Practices in Advanced Full Stack Web Development | Full Stack Web Development Advance
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What does the X-Frame-Options header do?

💡 Hint: Think about what clickjacking is.

Question 2

Easy

What is one directive you can use with X-Frame-Options?

💡 Hint: Recall the choices we discussed.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What does the X-Frame-Options header primarily protect against?

  • Cross-Site Scripting
  • Clickjacking
  • SQL Injection

💡 Hint: Think about the definition of clickjacking.

Question 2

Is it safe to use the ALLOW-FROM directive in modern web applications?

  • True
  • False

💡 Hint: Consider browser support for directives.

Solve 1 more question and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

You are tasked to enhance the security of a web application that has suffered from clickjacking attacks in the past. What steps would you recommend, specifically regarding the X-Frame-Options header?

💡 Hint: Consider the implications of framing within your application.

Question 2

You need to allow your web pages to be framed by your mobile application while preventing others from embedding it. How would you go about doing this using X-Frame-Options?

💡 Hint: Think about how framing controls work.

Challenge and get performance evaluation