Practice Intention - 14.2.1 | 14. Harmony in Family & Society (Human–Human Relationship) Topic: Understanding Trust – Intention vs Competence | Humanities - I (B.Tech)
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

Define 'intention' in the context of trust.

💡 Hint: Think about what drives someone's actions.

Question 2

Easy

Provide an example of positive intention.

💡 Hint: Consider someone trying to help, even if it’s not perfect.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What does intention refer to?

  • The motive behind actions
  • The outcome of actions
  • The skills needed for tasks

💡 Hint: Remember, intention is all about the 'why' behind what we do.

Question 2

True or false: Competence and intention are the same.

  • True
  • False

💡 Hint: Reflect on whether both terms define the same aspect of trust.

Solve 1 more question and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Imagine a scenario where someone’s good intentions lead to mistrust in a team project. How would you resolve the situation?

💡 Hint: Consider how ongoing communication could help teams overcome challenges.

Question 2

Analyze a situation where recognizing intention could take precedence over skills in a family setting. What strategies could build trust?

💡 Hint: Think about how family bonds can strengthen with deeper understanding.

Challenge and get performance evaluation