Production of Turbulent Kinetic Energy
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Interactive Audio Lesson
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Understanding Reynolds Shear Stress
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
Today, let's start by understanding Reynolds shear stress, often denoted as ρτ_ij. Can anyone explain what this term represents in turbulent flow?
Is it related to how shear force affects the flow velocity?
Exactly! ρτ_ij is crucial as it helps model average flow velocities. It's essentially a stress term affecting our fluid equations. To remember this, just think of it as the 'shear stress' of turbulent flows.
So, does this mean we have to model this to handle flow calculations?
Right! This challenge is known as the closure problem. We need to express ρτ_ij in terms of average flow to simplify our equations.
How do we actually solve this closure problem?
Great question! We often use a k-epsilon model for turbulence, which helps us compute turbulent kinetic energy effectively.
Can you break down what k-epsilon actually means?
Sure! The letter 'k' represents turbulent kinetic energy, while 'epsilon' denotes the dissipation rate. This model allows us to analyze how energy is generated and dissipated in turbulent flows.
In summary, Reynolds shear stress provides insight into the mean flow behavior, and the closure problem compels us to model it effectively.
Turbulence Models: k-Epsilon and k-Omega
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
In our previous session, we touched on k-epsilon models. Who can recollect how we defined the turbulent kinetic energy (TKE)?
Is it the sum of mean kinetic energy and turbulent kinetic energy?
That's correct! TKE consists of capital K and small k. Now, let's dig deeper into the importance of the k-epsilon model. Why do you think it's widely used?
It's probably because it gives reliable predictions for many fluid flow conditions.
Exactly! We typically choose constants like Cμ = 0.09 based on empirical values for simulations.
I've heard about the k-omega model as well. How does that compare?
Great point! While k-epsilon uses the dissipation rate ε, the k-omega model employs frequency and has its own advantages in near-wall modeling. Remember, the best model often depends on the specific application.
Can we summarize what makes these models unique?
Certainly! k-epsilon is robust for general turbulent flows, while k-omega is beneficial for boundary layer applications. Each has unique applications based on flow conditions.
Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS)
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
Today, we're shifting our focus to Direct Numerical Simulation or DNS. Who can explain the difference between DNS and other turbulence models?
DNS solves the Navier-Stokes equations without turbulence modeling, right?
Exactly! DNS provides exact solutions for turbulent flows but requires excessive computational resources. Why would that be?
Because it has to resolve all scales of motion precisely?
Spot on! The computational domain must be adequately large, far exceeding the character length scale L, while grid sizes must be smaller than the Kolmogorov length scale η.
How many grids do we actually need for simulations with high Reynolds numbers?
A good estimate could be L/η to the power of 3! For instance, a Reynolds number of 10^4 might require around 10^9 grids. This showcases why DNS is challenging from a resource standpoint.
So, it's not just about the equations; it's about how we can compute them too?
Precisely! Balancing computational cost and predictive accuracy is crucial in turbulent flow analysis. Remember, the significance of energy dissipation remains paramount.
Energy Balance in Turbulent Flows
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
In the realm of turbulence, understanding energy is key. Who can tell me about the relationship between energy supply and dissipation in turbulent flows?
Isn't it said that the supply of kinetic energy must balance with the dissipation?
Yes! This balance ensures turbulent flows remain steady over time. What happens if there's an imbalance?
Turbulence could either stop or become chaotic?
Correct! Dissipation translates energy into heat, limiting fluctuations. Understanding this balance helps inform how we design systems to manage turbulent flows efficiently.
What's the practical implication of this knowledge?
By analyzing energy dynamics, we can predict flow behavior under different conditions. This aids in optimizing engineering designs, especially in hydraulic systems.
So, energy dynamics can affect everything from flows in pipes to environmental conditions?
Absolutely! That's the essence of turbulent energy dynamics.
Introduction & Overview
Read summaries of the section's main ideas at different levels of detail.
Quick Overview
Standard
The section provides an overview of turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) and its significance in fluid dynamics. It discusses the Reynolds shear stress equation, closure problem, and the k-epsilon turbulence model used in calculations. The section emphasizes the structure of TKE, its governing equations, and the relationship with eddy viscosity, offering insights into both computational methods and numerical challenges in turbulence modeling.
Detailed
Detailed Summary
This section of the Hydraulic Engineering module details the Production of Turbulent Kinetic Energy (TKE), focusing on its role in computational fluid dynamics (CFD). The section begins with a recap of the Reynolds shear stress equation, emphasizing how it impacts mean flow and highlights the concept of the closure problem.
Key Concepts:
- Reynolds Shear Stress (ρτ_ij): Represents shear stress affecting average flow velocities and pressure in turbulent conditions.
- Closure Problem: The challenge of modeling Reynolds shear stress as a function of average flow to manage fluctuations in turbulent flows.
The discussion proceeds to the k-epsilon model, a prevalent approach for understanding TKE. The model breaks down TKE into:
- Instantaneous Kinetic Energy (k_t)
- Mean Kinetic Energy and Turbulent Kinetic Energy (K + k)
The equations governing these flows also include the continuity equation and a momentum equation incorporating eddy viscosity (ν_t), which can be derived from TKE and dissipation rate (ε). Constants such as Cμ, σ_k, and Cε are introduced, demonstrating their empirical values and significance.
The section further explores Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS), a method to simulate turbulence without models, explaining the computational requirements that come with high Reynolds numbers and the challenges relate to grid sizes.
Finally, the text draws attention to the vital balance between the supply of kinetic energy and the dissipation of turbulent energy, leading to key conclusions regarding the scale of turbulence and energy transfer. The relationships illustrated within Reynolds numbers illustrate the complexity and necessity of advanced modeling techniques in turbulent flow applications.
Audio Book
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Introduction to Turbulent Kinetic Energy
Chapter 1 of 7
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
So, this in this technique the model focuses on the mechanism that affects the turbulent kinetic energy, k stands for kinetic energy. So, the instantaneous kinetic energy k as a function of time k t of a turbulent flow is the sum of the mean kinetic energy and the turbulent kinetic energy k. So, k of t can be written as capital K + small k. So, this is small k and capital K is written is simply half u square + v squared + w squared actually u bar v bar and w bar and small k is written is half of u dash squared + v dash squared + w dash squared.
Detailed Explanation
In fluid dynamics, turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) is the energy contained in the swirling motions of a fluid. The total kinetic energy of a turbulent flow at a given instant can be thought of as being made up of two parts: the mean kinetic energy (K) and the turbulent kinetic energy (k). The mean kinetic energy is derived from the average velocities of the flow (represented by u, v, and w), while turbulent kinetic energy accounts for the fluctuations around these average velocities. Consequently, they combine to form the instantaneous kinetic energy represented mathematically as k(t) = K + k, where K is the mean part and k is the turbulent part.
Examples & Analogies
Think of a river. The water flowing steadily represents the mean kinetic energy (K), while the swirls and eddies that form and dissipate are akin to the turbulent kinetic energy (k). Just as the river has both calm areas and turbulent sections, flows in different scenarios can be described similarly.
The Governing Equations
Chapter 2 of 7
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
The governing equations for this are one we have continuity equation and the other is so, the way we write is So, D D t of tau i j that is what we are modeling is -1 by rho del p del x i + del x j into 2 nu + nu t into del i j. How does equations have been derived we are not going to discuss but these are the 2 equations that we use for momentum.
Detailed Explanation
The behavior of turbulent flows is modeled using governing equations. In this context, we have the continuity equation and a momentum equation, which expresses how the shear stress (τij) evolves over time under various influences, such as pressure gradients and viscous effects. The term 'nu' represents the kinematic viscosity of the fluid, while 'nu_t' indicates the turbulent eddy viscosity, essential in turbulence modeling.
Examples & Analogies
Imagine driving a car. The continuity equation is like ensuring you have enough fuel to continue driving, while the momentum equation relates to how fast and in which direction you accelerate or decelerate based on the pressure you apply to the gas pedal or brakes.
Eddy Viscosity and Its Importance
Chapter 3 of 7
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
So, if you see there is a term called nu T. So, this nu t is the eddy viscosity. So, this actually is not should better be called as turbulent eddy viscosity, nu T, it can be actually dimensionally related to kinetic energy k kinetic energy dissipation rate epsilon through nu T is written as c mu into k square by epsilon.
Detailed Explanation
Eddy viscosity (ν_T) refers to the turbulent expansion of fluid momentum within a fluid flow, helping to quantify the effects of turbulence. It connects to the turbulent kinetic energy and its dissipation rate, making it essential for modeling turbulent flows in engineering. The equation ν_T = cμ * (k^2 / ε) shows that eddy viscosity is influenced by the square of turbulent kinetic energy divided by its dissipation rate, with cμ being a constant determined experimentally.
Examples & Analogies
Think of a busy highway. The eddy viscosity is like the traffic flow around obstacles (like slow-moving vehicles or construction) that cause changes to usual traffic speed. Vehicles can maintain their speed but will also find ways around slower cars, showing how energy and movement are transferred and dissipated in a fluid-like manner.
Solving for Turbulent Kinetic Energy and Epsilon
Chapter 4 of 7
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
The turbulent kinetic energy and the energy dissipation can be determined from the following equation. So, now, we said that this is the equation which we are going to use for determining tau i j and that we can use in our average equation Reynolds average Navier stokes equation... And use it in the average equation of Reynolds Navier Stokes equation.
Detailed Explanation
To computationally approach the challenge of modeling turbulence, we need equations that can help us ascertain not just the turbulent kinetic energy (k) but also the dissipation rate (ε). The key relationship is that these values must be solved alongside the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations, which together handle averages in fluid dynamics. Thus, we find specific equations tailored for k and ε that ultimately help us model the turbulent behavior effectively.
Examples & Analogies
Consider the weather. Meteorologists analyze not only current temperatures (like k) but also how fast they change (like ε) in their models to predict weather patterns. This goes to show how key values are essential for accurate modeling, akin to what we do with turbulent flows.
Complexity of Turbulence Modeling
Chapter 5 of 7
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
So, this for just writing it down solve for k and epsilon then nu T is related to k square by epsilon. Nu T, put this in Reynolds shear stress equation and use that in Reynolds average Navier stokes equations. It is quite a complex way, but it gives good results.
Detailed Explanation
Modeling turbulence is inherently complex because it involves iteratively solving equations for k, ε, and ν_T, before ultimately substituting back into the shear stress equations for Reynolds-averaged equations. While this may seem convoluted, this process has proven reliable and accurate for predicting turbulent flows effectively within various engineering contexts.
Examples & Analogies
Think about baking a cake. You need to follow a series of steps—mixing ingredients, checking the oven temperature, timing—the complexity ensures the final product is delicious. In turbulence modeling, every step must be carefully considered to achieve precise outcomes.
Comparing Turbulence Models: k-epsilon vs. k-omega
Chapter 6 of 7
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
Most of the turbulence model in the world follow k and epsilon, there is one other turbulence model for k omega. So, k is the same kinetic energy omega is somehow related to dissipation epsilon, but that is also outside the scope, but it is better to remember the name.
Detailed Explanation
The two prevalent models for turbulence in engineering are the k-epsilon and k-omega models. They both focus on kinetic energy, but they handle the dissipation differently. The k-epsilon model works well for free shear flows and is widely used due to its reliability, while the k-omega model may offer advantages in near-wall flows. Understanding both will give engineers flexibility based on the flow conditions they are evaluating.
Examples & Analogies
Choosing between k-epsilon and k-omega models is like selecting a specific recipe based on the occasion. For a quick dessert, a no-bake recipe (k-epsilon) is more straightforward, while for a complex dish (k-omega), one might need deeper techniques and expertise.
Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS)
Chapter 7 of 7
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
So, another method apart from Reynolds average Navier Stokes equation for solving the turbulence, for solving the computational fluid dynamics Navier Stokes equation is called direct numerical simulation.
Detailed Explanation
Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS) is a technique that solves the Navier-Stokes equations without using turbulence models, capturing all scales of motion. DNS requires very fine spatial resolution and numerical accuracy, making it computationally expensive but allowing for the most accurate simulations of turbulence.
Examples & Analogies
Imagine you were to film a live performance instead of just getting a summary of highlights. DNS is like that detailed film—capturing every nuance and movement. Though it requires a lot of resources and effort, the richness of the data is invaluable.
Key Concepts
-
Reynolds Shear Stress (ρτ_ij): Represents shear stress affecting average flow velocities and pressure in turbulent conditions.
-
Closure Problem: The challenge of modeling Reynolds shear stress as a function of average flow to manage fluctuations in turbulent flows.
-
The discussion proceeds to the k-epsilon model, a prevalent approach for understanding TKE. The model breaks down TKE into:
-
Instantaneous Kinetic Energy (k_t)
-
Mean Kinetic Energy and Turbulent Kinetic Energy (K + k)
-
The equations governing these flows also include the continuity equation and a momentum equation incorporating eddy viscosity (ν_t), which can be derived from TKE and dissipation rate (ε). Constants such as Cμ, σ_k, and Cε are introduced, demonstrating their empirical values and significance.
-
The section further explores Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS), a method to simulate turbulence without models, explaining the computational requirements that come with high Reynolds numbers and the challenges relate to grid sizes.
-
Finally, the text draws attention to the vital balance between the supply of kinetic energy and the dissipation of turbulent energy, leading to key conclusions regarding the scale of turbulence and energy transfer. The relationships illustrated within Reynolds numbers illustrate the complexity and necessity of advanced modeling techniques in turbulent flow applications.
Examples & Applications
In a turbulent flow around an airplane wing, TKE influences drag and lift characteristics.
The k-epsilon model is applied in weather forecasting to simulate atmospheric turbulence and predict wind patterns.
Memory Aids
Interactive tools to help you remember key concepts
Rhymes
In flow that's turbulent, K and epsilon reign, Energy they balance, in order for flow to retain.
Stories
Imagine a bustling river with turbulent currents. To keep the flow smooth, energy from the hills spills down, while the submerged rocks dissipate the energy as heat, exemplifying perfect balance.
Memory Tools
Remember 'K-E-E-D!': Kinetic energy, Energy dissipation, Epsilon, DNS.
Acronyms
TKE
Turbulent Kinetic Energy - where T stands for Turbulent
for Kinetic
for Energy!
Flash Cards
Glossary
- Turbulent Kinetic Energy (TKE)
A measure of the kinetic energy associated with the turbulence in a flow, comprising both mean and fluctuating components.
- Reynolds Shear Stress (ρτ_ij)
A term representing shear stress in turbulent flows, influencing average velocities and pressure.
- Closure Problem
The challenge of defining unknown terms in turbulent flow equations, specifically in relation to Reynolds shear stress.
- kepsilon Model
A turbulence model that utilizes the kinetic energy (k) and its dissipation rate (ε) to predict turbulent flows.
- Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS)
A computational method to simulate fluid flows without turbulence modeling, requiring high computational resources.
- Eddy Viscosity (ν_t)
A turbulent viscosity coefficient used in turbulence models to describe energy dissipation and transfer rates.
Reference links
Supplementary resources to enhance your learning experience.