Practice International Courts and Tribunals - 5.2.4 | Unit 5: Human Rights and Global Justice | IB Board Grade 12 – Individuals and Societies
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Academics
Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Professional Courses
Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.

games

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What does ICC stand for?

💡 Hint: Think about the court that handles individual crimes.

Question 2

Easy

What type of cases does the ICJ deal with?

💡 Hint: Consider conflicts between countries.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What is the primary function of the International Criminal Court?

  • To settle disputes between states
  • To prosecute individuals for serious crimes
  • To provide advisory opinions on legal questions

💡 Hint: Think about what type of responsibility the ICC addresses.

Question 2

True or False: The International Court of Justice only deals with individual defendants.

  • True
  • False

💡 Hint: Remember who the court's jurisdiction targets.

Solve 1 more question and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Evaluate the effectiveness of the ICC in holding leaders accountable for war crimes. What are potential pitfalls?

💡 Hint: Consider the interplay between international law and national sovereignty.

Question 2

Analyze a specific case handled by the ICJ and its impacts on state relations.

💡 Hint: Focus on how legal decisions affect diplomatic ties.

Challenge and get performance evaluation