Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Today, we'll discuss how to create a calibration curve for quantitative fluorescence. Who can tell me what a calibration curve is?
Is it a graph that relates the intensity of fluorescence to the concentration of an analyte?
Absolutely! We prepare standards with known concentrations and measure their fluorescence intensity. The plotted points help generate the curve.
And what is the equation we use for the line?
Good question! It's typically in the linear form: I_f^l = k * c + b. Here, k is the slope, and b is the intercept. We aim to keep b close to zero for accurate results.
So, if b is not close to zero, what does that indicate?
It could suggest that there are additional factors affecting our measurements. To reinforce that understanding, let’s remember: the closer to zero, the better!
Can we do this with just one standard?
Ideally, we use multiple standards. The more points, the better our line fits the data. So to summarize, a calibration curve is crucial for quantifying fluorescence!
Now, let's discuss the inner filter effect. Who can explain how high concentration can affect our fluorescence readings?
I think it reduces the amount of light that can get absorbed, right?
Exactly! When the sample absorbs too much light, it leads to inaccurate intensity readings. How can we correct this?
Do we measure absorbance at both the excitation and emission wavelengths?
Yes! We then apply this formula: I_corrected = I_measured × 10^((A_ex + A_em) / 2). This helps ensure our readings reflect true fluorescence intensity.
Can we always assume we need to adjust for this effect?
Not always, but at higher concentrations, it's a critical consideration to maintain measurement accuracy. Remember: correct before you analyze.
Let's dive into quenching! Quenching decreases fluorescence intensity. What do you think causes it?
It could be due to collisions with other molecules or complex formations?
Excellent! To quantify this, we use the Stern–Volmer equation: (I₀ / I) = 1 + K_SV * [Q]. Can anyone explain what each term represents?
I₀ is the intensity without quencher, and I is the intensity with the quencher. '[Q]' refers to quencher concentration.
Exactly! And K_SV is the Stern–Volmer constant. This relationship allows us to understand how fluorescence decreases with added quencher.
So, the higher the concentration of the quencher, the more the intensity decreases?
Right! In summary, quenching is crucial for interpreting fluorescence data, and the Stern–Volmer equation is our key tool for analysis.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
This section delves into the quantitative aspects of fluorescence spectroscopy, focusing on how to prepare calibration curves, address potential errors introduced by high concentration effects, and understand quenching phenomena using Stern–Volmer equations. The significance of fluorescence intensity in relation to analyte concentration and the importance of corrective measures for accurate results are also emphasized.
Quantitative fluorescence is a vital technique that allows scientists to measure the fluorescence emitted by substances that have absorbed light or electromagnetic radiation. This section covers key principles involved in quantitative fluorescence, including:
To establish a relationship between fluorescence intensity and analyte concentration, researchers prepare standard solutions with known concentrations (c1, c2, c3, …). The fluorescence intensity (I) at the emission maximum (λ_em) is measured, and the data is plotted to generate a calibration curve. The relationship can be expressed as:
I_f^l = k * c + b
Where k is the slope of the curve and b is the intercept, ideally close to zero.
At high concentrations, samples can absorb significant excitation light, affecting the fluorescence measurements. To correct for this inner filter effect, researchers apply a correction factor based on the absorbance at both the excitation (A_ex) and emission (A_em) wavelengths:
I_corrected = I_measured × 10^((A_ex + A_em) / 2)
This adjustment helps mitigate inaccuracies in fluorescence intensity readings.
Fluorescence quenching occurs when the intensity of fluorescence decreases due to various processes, including collisional interactions or static complex formation. The Stern–Volmer equation is employed to analyze this:
(I₀ / I) = 1 + K_SV * [Q]
Where I₀ is the fluorescence intensity in the absence of a quencher, I is the intensity with quencher presence, and [Q] is the quencher concentration.
By mastering these concepts, researchers can accurately use fluorescence spectroscopy for quantitative analysis in various scientific fields, enhancing the reliability of data they obtain.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Prepare standards with known concentrations c₁, c₂, c₃, … within the linear range (low absorbance, typically A < 0.05). Measure fluorescence intensity Iᶠˡ at emission maximum λ_em. Plot Iᶠˡ versus c; slope k = (Iᶠˡ ÷ c). If Iᶠˡ = k c + b (b ideally zero), use it to determine unknown concentrations.
To effectively perform quantitative fluorescence analysis, we begin by preparing a series of standard solutions with known concentrations of the substance we are analyzing. These standards need to have absorbance values that fall within a manageable range—in general, below 0.05—to ensure accurate measurements.
After preparing these samples, we measure how bright the fluorescence is when they are excited by a specific wavelength of light, which we call the emission maximum, λ_em.
Next, we plot a graph with the fluorescence intensity (Iᶠˡ) on one axis and the known concentrations on the other. The slope (k) of this line helps us understand how much the fluorescence intensity changes with changes in concentration. Ideally, the graph should pass through the origin, meaning that when there's no substance present, the fluorescence intensity should be zero. This relationship allows us to calculate the concentration of unknown samples by referring back to our calibration curve.
Think of this process like creating a map to a treasure. Each point on the map represents a known location (the standards), giving you a clear indication of how to get to the treasure (the unknown sample) based on how far it is from your reference points. If you had a friend who always tells you how much farther away you are from the treasure based on your starting location, that's like the slope of your calibration curve informing you how the changes in concentration affect fluorescence.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
At higher concentrations, sample absorbs significant excitation light before it reaches the entire volume; also reabsorbs emission. To correct, measure absorbance at excitation and emission wavelengths and apply a correction factor: I_corrected = I_measured × 10^((A_ex + A_em) ÷ 2).
The 'inner filter effect' in fluorescence spectroscopy occurs when the concentration of the sample is too high. In this situation, the sample itself can absorb too much of the light used to excite it, and also absorb part of the emitted light that it generates. This ultimately leads to inaccurate readings in fluorescence intensity. To resolve this, we need to make careful measurements of the absorbance at both the excitation and emission wavelengths.
From these measurements, we can calculate a correction factor to adjust our recorded fluorescence intensity (I_measured), making it more accurate. The formula I_corrected = I_measured × 10^((A_ex + A_em) ÷ 2) helps us account for the absorbance at excitation (A_ex) and emission (A_em). This allows us to accurately interpret the fluorescence response of the sample.
Imagine trying to take a photo of a friend standing behind a window. If the glass is too tinted, their face might appear too dark in the picture. By gauging how dark the glass is, you can adjust your camera settings to get a clearer image. Similarly, measuring absorbance helps us correct for the 'tint' caused by high sample concentrations so that we can see the true picture of fluorescence.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Some analytes are quenched by collisional processes or by static complex formation, decreasing fluorescence. Stern–Volmer plot: (I₀ ÷ I) versus quencher concentration [Q], where I₀ is fluorescence without quencher, I is with quencher. Slope = K_SV (Stern–Volmer constant).
Quenching refers to the process by which the fluorescence intensity of a sample decreases due to various interactions, such as when the fluorophore collides with a quencher molecule or forms a complex with it. To understand this effect quantitatively, we can use what is known as the Stern–Volmer equation.
By plotting the ratio of the fluorescence intensity without the quencher (I₀) to the fluorescence intensity with the quencher (I) against the concentration of the quencher ([Q]), a linear relationship is typically observed. The slope of this line (K_SV) gives us the Stern–Volmer constant, which provides information about how strongly the quencher interacts with the fluorophore.
Think about a lively party where one person (the fluorophore) is dancing. If a group of friends (the quenchers) starts to crowd around them, the dancer might get overwhelmed and stop dancing as energetically. The more friends that crowd in, the less dance energy we see. The Stern–Volmer constant gives us a measure of just how disruptive those friends are to the dancer's performance.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Calibration Curve: A graph that plots fluorescence intensity against known concentrations to quantify an analyte.
Inner Filter Effect: A reduction in measured fluorescence due to high concentration absorbance.
Quenching: Decreased fluorescence caused by molecular interactions.
Stern–Volmer Equation: A formula to assess the relationship between fluorescence intensity and quencher concentration.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
Creating a calibration curve using standard solutions helps quantify unknown analytes based on their fluorescence.
Inner filter effects can be corrected to ensure accurate fluorescence readings using specific formula adjustments.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
When measuring fluorescence, here’s the trick, / Grab a curve for calibration, and don’t let it slip.
Imagine a scientist measuring light emitted by a tiny gem. Without a calibration curve, the readings are unsure. When applying the inner filter effect, the gem’s brilliance will shine even more, revealing the secrets that were dimmed before.
For quenching, remember: Q - Quieting emission, by adding the quencher.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Calibration Curve
Definition:
A plot of fluorescence intensity versus analyte concentration, used for quantification.
Term: Inner Filter Effect
Definition:
A phenomenon where high concentration of a sample absorbs significant amounts of excitation light, leading to reduced measured fluorescence.
Term: Quenching
Definition:
The process through which the fluorescence intensity decreases due to various interactions.
Term: Stern–Volmer Equation
Definition:
An equation that quantifies the degree of fluorescence quenching based on quencher concentration.