Why did India adopt the FPTP system?
India's choice of the First Past the Post (FPTP) electoral system was largely driven by practical considerations regarding simplicity and effectiveness within its diverse context. The FPTP system is easily understandable for voters, allowing them to endorse a candidate or party directly. Unlike proportional representation (PR) systems, it ensures voters know their representatives, fostering a sense of accountability.
Furthermore, the Constitution's framers believed that PR systems may not be conducive to forming a stable governmental structure within India's parliamentary framework, as it often leads to fragmented legislatures and lack of majority. FPTP tends to grant extra seats to the largest party or coalition, hence promoting majority rule essential for a stable governance.
Additionally, in India's multi-ethnic society, FPTP encourages different social groups to unite for local electoral success, preventing the emergence of regional parties that may further divide national interests. This essential feature of FPTP has been instrumental in the political landscape, discouraging parties reliant solely on particular castes or communities.
Overall, while FPTP has led to a two-party or dominant-party system, it has also facilitated the inclusion of new and smaller parties through coalition dynamics, particularly after the 1980s.