Some Early PILs
This section introduces the concept of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in India, a legal mechanism that allows individuals or groups to file petitions in court on behalf of disadvantaged persons or issues affecting the public interest. The emergence of PILs marked a significant shift in the Indian judiciary, moving from a focus on personal grievances to broader societal issues.
Key Early Cases
-
Hussainara Khatoon vs. Bihar (1979): This case arose from reports concerning undertrials in Bihar who had been incarcerated for longer than what their sentences would have been if convicted. This PIL brought to light the issues surrounding the rights of prisoners and garnered significant attention in the media.
-
Sunil Batra vs. Delhi Administration (1980): Initiated via a letter from a prisoner detailing instances of torture in Tihar jail, this case underscored the need for judicial oversight on human rights infringements within prisons. Although the court later discontinued the practice of accepting letters, this case set a precedent for future PILs regarding prisoners' rights.
Significance of PILs
- Expansion of Rights: PILs have broadened the interpretation of rights from individual-focused to include collective rights such as access to clean air and safe living conditions.
- Accessibility of Justice: They have democratized the judicial process, allowing for group actions and expanding access to justice for the marginalized.
- Judicial Activism: The introduction of PILs is a key aspect of judicial activism, where the judiciary proactively engages in societal issues to uphold constitutional rights.
Conclusion
PILs have transformed the judiciary’s role in India, reinforcing its function as a protector of fundamental rights and a platform for social change.