1.5. SOCIOLOGY AND COMMON SENSE KNOWLEDGE

We have seen how sociological knowledge is different from theological and philosophical observations. Likewise sociology is different from common sense observations. The common sense explanations are generally based on what may be called ‘naturalistic’ and/or individualistic explanation. A naturalistic explanation for behaviour rests on the assumption that one can really identify ‘natural’ reasons for behaviour.

Sociology differs significantly from common sense knowledge. Common sense knowledge often relies on immediate perceptions and oversimplified interpretations of human behavior, typically attributing actions to individual choices or 'natural' factors. For instance, if a person is poor, common sense might suggest it's due to their lack of effort or bad choices. In contrast, sociology examines behavior through a deeper lens that considers broader societal influences, structural factors, and inequalities that shape individual experiences and decisions.

Imagine observing a neighbor who struggles to pay their bills. Common sense might lead you to think they simply don’t manage their money well. However, a sociological perspective would encourage you to consider other factors: perhaps they lost a job in an economic downturn, or maybe they face systemic barriers in their community that limit their job opportunities. By looking past the surface, we gain a more nuanced understanding of the person's situation.

Sociology thus breaks away from both common sense observations and ideas as well as from philosophical thought. It does not always or even generally lead to spectacular results. But meaningful and unsuspected connections can be reached only by sifting through masses of connections. Great advances in sociological knowledge have been made, generally incrementally and only rarely by a dramatic breakthrough.

Sociology is committed to a systematic approach in studying society. This means that sociologists gather data, analyze social patterns, and derive theories based on empirical evidence, rather than jumping to conclusions based on personal beliefs or common assumptions. The progress made in sociology is often gradual, requiring detailed investigation and analysis of numerous connections within social phenomena, leading to new insights over time.

Think of sociology like piecing together a very complicated puzzle. At first glance, the pieces may not seem to fit together, and it may take a long time to figure out where they belong. As you work methodically, looking at each piece and how it relates to others, a clearer picture of the overall image begins to emerge. Likewise, sociologists may uncover insights about society that aren't immediately obvious, which could help address complex social issues.

Common sense is unreflective since it does not question its own origins. Or in other words it does not ask itself: “Why do I hold this view?” The sociologist must be ready to ask of any of our beliefs, about ourselves — no matter how cherished — “is this really so?” Both the systematic and questioning approach of sociology is derived from a broader tradition of scientific investigation.

A core element of sociological inquiry is the critical examination of beliefs, including those that seem self-evident or widely accepted. Sociology challenges individuals to reflect on the origins of their ideas and questions their validity. This contrasts with common sense, which tends to accept beliefs without scrutiny. The sociological method encourages a rigorous examination of social norms and values, fostering deeper understanding and insight.

Consider the belief that going to college automatically leads to a good job. This is a commonly held notion, often echoed in families and communities. A sociologist would question this by exploring various factors, such as economic conditions, job market competitiveness, and changing industries. Such inquiry reveals that while education is valuable, it may not be the sole determinant of employment success.

This emphasis on scientific procedures can be understood only if we go back in time and understand the context or social situation within which the sociological perspective emerged as sociology was greatly influenced by the great developments in modern science.

Sociology's adoption of scientific methodologies reflects its foundation in the broader historical context of scientific advancements, particularly from the Enlightenment period onwards. This influence leads sociologists to develop systematic methods for collecting data and analyzing social trends, allowing for evidence-based conclusions. This contrasts with approaches that may rely solely on anecdotal evidence, resulting in more reliable insights into social dynamics.

Imagine a science lab where researchers carefully plan experiments, gather data, and analyze results. Sociology mirrors this approach but applies it to social interactions instead. Through surveys, interviews, and observations, sociologists methodically collect evidence about how various factors interact within society, similar to how scientists study chemical reactions or biological processes. This rigorous approach ensures their findings are grounded in real-world evidence.

--