The Language of the Nation
Overview
The subject of language was pivotal in the formation of India's identity and its Constitution, reflecting the nation's linguistic diversity and cultural heritage. As the Constituent Assembly convened, the necessity for a common language that could unify the populace became a contentious issue.
Historical Context
In the early 20th century, Hindustani (a blend of Hindi and Urdu) was proposed by Mahatma Gandhi as the national language because it was widely understood. However, political and communal tensions led to a divergence between Hindi and Urdu, with proponents arguing for a more Sanskritized form of Hindi.
Debates in the Constituent Assembly
Members of the Constituent Assembly were polarized on the issue:
- R. V. Dhulekar's Stance: He forcefully argued for Hindi as the language for constitution-making, exhibiting strong nationalism and frustration towards non-Hindi speakers in the Assembly.
- G. Durgabai's Concerns: She highlighted that the promotion of Hindi threatened regional languages and felt the push was compromising the sophisticated character of Hindustani. Many from non-Hindi speaking regions expressed apprehension that Hindi imposition would marginalize them and undermine their linguistic rights.
Compromise Solutions
The Language Committee proposed a compromise: to adopt Hindi in Devanagari script as the official language, allowing a gradual transition while maintaining English for administrative purposes for 15 years.
This approach aimed to balance national unity with respect for regional linguistic diversity, is reflected in the transitional strategies laid out in the Constitution. The debates around this issue encapsulated a larger discourse on cultural identity, representation, and the complexities of nation-building in a diverse society.