In the context of post-Partition India, the Constituent Assembly engaged in vigorous debates on the distribution of powers between the Central Government and the states. Jawaharlal Nehru argued for a strong Centre, asserting that a weak central authority could harm national interests and efficiency. He emphasized the necessity of a unified voice in international matters, particularly after the trauma of Partition. The Draft Constitution proposed a three-list structure categorizing subjects into Union, State, and Concurrent lists, with a greater number of subjects under Union control than typically seen in other federations. Notably, Article 356 allowed the Centre to assume control over state administration in certain situations. Opposing voices, like K. Santhanam, warned that overburdening the Centre with responsibilities could lead to dysfunction and diminish provincial autonomy, advocating instead for a reallocation of powers to strengthen both entities. The discussions encapsulated the broader tension between necessary centralization for national stability and the preservation of individual state identities and capacities.