GDP AND WELFARE
This section explores whether GDP can truly serve as an index for the welfare of a country's populace. It begins by stating that higher income can improve material well-being, leading to the initial assumption that GDP, as the sum value of goods and services produced within a nation's borders in a given year, indicates greater welfare. However, the section elaborates on three critical reasons why this assumption may be misleading:
1. Distribution of GDP
The distribution of GDP is crucial; even if GDP rises, welfare may not improve if the gains are concentrated among a small fraction of the population, leading to a situation where most individuals become worse off. An example illustrated involves an imaginary country where GDP increases, but the majority of its population sees a reduction in real income, thus questioning the validity of using GDP as a welfare measure.
2. Non-monetary Exchanges
Many valuable economic activities, particularly those conducted informally or domestically, may not be captured in GDP calculations. Domestic work and barter exchanges often go unmonetized and unrecorded in the GDP figures, particularly in developing countries, suggesting that actual welfare may be underestimated.
3. Externalities
Externalities are effects of economic activities that impact individuals not directly involved in transactions, such as pollution from production processes. GDP can thus overestimate welfare by failing to account for negative externalities, or it may underestimate it due to positive externalities arising from beneficial effects on others. Overall, relying solely on GDP to gauge welfare offers a skewed perspective.