Learn
Games

5.3.1 - External Security

Interactive Audio Lesson

Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.

Understanding Security

Unlock Audio Lesson

Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Lesson

Teacher
Teacher

Today, we'll explore the concept of security. Security often implies freedom from threats, but what does that mean for individuals and countries?

Student 1
Student 1

Isn’t security mostly about protecting the state?

Teacher
Teacher

Great point! That's the traditional view, focusing on state sovereignty. But remember, security can also mean the protection of people, which is where human security comes in—think 'human over state'.

Student 2
Student 2

So, can we say that every threat affects security?

Teacher
Teacher

Not every threat qualifies. We tend to classify severe threats that can cause significant harm to core values as security threats. Let’s keep that in mind.

Traditional Security Concepts

Unlock Audio Lesson

Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Lesson

Teacher
Teacher

Traditional security primarily addresses military threats. What components do you think are involved?

Student 3
Student 3

Military action, alliances, and maybe deterrence?

Teacher
Teacher

Exactly! We maintain military strength to prevent war and protect citizens. The idea of balance of power is essential here. Can anyone explain why?

Student 4
Student 4

If one state is stronger, others may feel threatened and want to build their military too, right?

Teacher
Teacher

Exactly! The balance of power is key in international relations. And remember that it involves creating alliances for greater strength.

Internal vs External Threats

Unlock Audio Lesson

Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Lesson

Teacher
Teacher

Let’s discuss how internal security interacts with external threats. Why is internal peace crucial?

Student 1
Student 1

If a country is fighting its own issues, it can't focus on threats from outside.

Teacher
Teacher

Exactly! Instability within can make a country more vulnerable to external threats. Now, when we consider these threats, does anyone know how states respond?

Student 2
Student 2

They can choose to prevent, defend, or even surrender.

Teacher
Teacher

Correct! These choices are crucial for maintaining national security.

Non-Traditional Security Threats

Unlock Audio Lesson

Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Lesson

Teacher
Teacher

Now, let’s shift towards non-traditional threats. How does this concept differ from the traditional view?

Student 3
Student 3

It looks beyond military action to include things like health crises or environmental changes.

Teacher
Teacher

Right! Human security prioritizes individuals and communities. It’s vital to understand how these global issues can require international cooperation.

Student 4
Student 4

So, we need alliances even for non-military issues?

Teacher
Teacher

Precisely! Non-traditional security emphasizes collective approaches to tackle these global threats. Remember the term 'Global Security' as we move forward.

Conclusion of Security Concepts

Unlock Audio Lesson

Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Lesson

Teacher
Teacher

To wrap up, we've discussed the evolution of security concepts. What are some major points we covered?

Student 1
Student 1

We learned about military threats and the importance of balance of power.

Student 2
Student 2

And that internal security is crucial for external security!

Teacher
Teacher

Excellent! And we've touched on how human security and global security require us to rethink our approach to threats. Can anyone summarize what we've learned about alliances in this context?

Student 3
Student 3

Alliances are essential for both traditional and non-traditional security issues, helping countries work together.

Teacher
Teacher

Well done! Remember these connections as we move into more complex scenarios in security.

Introduction & Overview

Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.

Quick Overview

This section discusses the concepts of external security and its relation to traditional and non-traditional security threats faced by nations.

Standard

External security encompasses the threats that nations face from foreign entities, primarily focusing on military threats, balance of power, alliances, and the importance of internal stability. It contrasts traditional security views centered on state sovereignty with non-traditional views that consider human security and global threats.

Detailed

Overview of External Security

The discourse around national security often involves understanding its definitions and implications within the context of global politics. National security is typically seen as exclusive and vital to state sovereignty, frequently used to suppress debate and discussion. The chapter critically examines security issues, particularly focusing on India’s security concerns.

Traditional vs Non-Traditional Security

Traditional security prioritizes threats from military actions by other countries, focusing on maintaining sovereignty, independence, and territorial integrity. Key components include:
- Military Threats: Nations view rival countries with a superior military presence as a potential threat.
- Deterrence and Defense: Governments strategize to either prevent war or defend their territory when necessary.
- Balance of Power: Ensuring military and economic strength relative to other nations is crucial in international relations.
- Alliances: Nations form coalitions to enhance mutual security against perceived threats.

However, there is an understanding that internal security also plays a crucial role. Countries must maintain internal order to effectively manage external threats.

Emerging Non-Traditional Security Threats

In contrast, non-traditional security acknowledges broader issues impacting human existence, such as:
- Human Security: Emphasizing individuals and communities rather than just the state—addressing poverty, diseases, and environmental threats.
- Global Security: Recognizing collective international challenges such as terrorism, epidemics, and environmental changes that necessitate cooperative responses.

The chapter highlights how the evolution of modern threats requires a re-evaluation of security concepts, promoting a merger of traditional state-focused and broader human-oriented understandings of security.

Youtube Videos

NCERT Class 12 Political Science Chapter 7: Security in Contemporary World | CBSE | English | World
NCERT Class 12 Political Science Chapter 7: Security in Contemporary World | CBSE | English | World
Class 12 Political Science Chapter 7 Security in the Contemporary World Full explanation CBSE & CUET
Class 12 Political Science Chapter 7 Security in the Contemporary World Full explanation CBSE & CUET
Security in The Contemporary World | Full Chapter Explanation | Class 12 | Digraj Singh Rajput
Security in The Contemporary World | Full Chapter Explanation | Class 12 | Digraj Singh Rajput
Security In the Contemporary World Most Important Question class 12 Political science #2025boardexam
Security In the Contemporary World Most Important Question class 12 Political science #2025boardexam
Security In The Contemporary World // Class 12 Political Science Important Topics #humanitieskaksha
Security In The Contemporary World // Class 12 Political Science Important Topics #humanitieskaksha
Security in the contemporary world class 12 political science
Security in the contemporary world class 12 political science
Security in contemporary world class 12
Security in contemporary world class 12
Class 12 Political Science chapter 5 Security In the Contemporary World class 12 Political science
Class 12 Political Science chapter 5 Security In the Contemporary World class 12 Political science
Class 12 Political Science Security in the Contemporary World | For Boards & CUET | One Shot video
Class 12 Political Science Security in the Contemporary World | For Boards & CUET | One Shot video
Security In Contemporary World | One Shot | Class 12 Political Science | Boards 2024 | Anushya Ma'am
Security In Contemporary World | One Shot | Class 12 Political Science | Boards 2024 | Anushya Ma'am

Audio Book

Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.

Defining Traditional Security

Unlock Audio Book

Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book

In the traditional conception of security, the greatest danger to a country is from military threats. The source of this danger is usually another country, which, by threatening military action, endangers the core values of sovereignty, independence, and territorial integrity.

Detailed Explanation

Traditional security focuses mainly on military threats to a nation. It suggests that the biggest risks to a country arise from other countries making military threats. These threats jeopardize essential values such as a country's sovereignty and territorial integrity. In simpler terms, if one country decides to attack another, it can lead to severe consequences that can alter the very essence of what that nation stands for.

Examples & Analogies

Imagine a school where one class is constantly intimidating another during recess. The threatened class feels insecure, unable to express itself freely, akin to a nation that fears invasion. Just as that class would seek to either befriend or confront the bullies to ensure their safety, countries take similar measures in the face of military threats.

Responses to Military Threats

Unlock Audio Book

Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book

In responding to the threat of war, a government has three basic choices: to surrender, to prevent the other side from attacking by raising the costs of war to an unacceptable level, and to defend itself when war actually occurs.

Detailed Explanation

When faced with the possibility of war, governments have three primary options. They can choose to surrender, which is rarely advertised as an official policy because it implies weakness. The second option is to deter potential attacks by making the costs of war so high that the attacking party would think twice before initiating aggression. Lastly, if war breaks out, the government will likely turn to the defense option, aiming to protect its territory and citizens. Each option carries its own implications and consequences for national security.

Examples & Analogies

Think of a person facing a bully. They can either back down (surrender), stand their ground and prepare to fight back if attacked (defend), or try to make it clear that attacking them would lead to severe consequences (deter). The approach taken has a lot to do with both the individual’s confidence and the situation at large.

Balance of Power and Alliances

Unlock Audio Book

Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book

A third component of traditional security policy is balance of power. Countries observe the military capabilities of other nations and assess potential threats. They form alliances to deter aggression and increase their combined power relative to adversaries.

Detailed Explanation

Countries keep a close eye on the strength of each other in the international arena. They want to ensure no single country becomes too powerful, which could lead to domination and aggression. To maintain stability, nations often form alliances with other countries, allowing them to combine their military capabilities and act in unison against threats. This is often referred to as maintaining a 'balance of power' in a region.

Examples & Analogies

Imagine a group of friends in a neighborhood. If one friend has a much larger and stronger dog than the others, the weaker dogs might band together to prevent any potential bullying. This alliance between the dogs helps balance the power dynamic, making it less likely that one dog will act aggressively towards the others.

Internal Security and its Importance

Unlock Audio Book

Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book

Traditional security must also concern itself with internal security. The reason it is not given as much emphasis is that, post-World War II, powerful countries seemed to have internal security more or less assured.

Detailed Explanation

While traditional security often emphasizes external threats, internal security—ensuring peace and order within a nation—is equally crucial. Historically, after the Second World War, many powerful nations felt secure within their own borders. This sense of internal security reduced the focus on addressing domestic threats, yet, unchecked internal issues can destabilize a nation and complicate its ability to respond to external pressures.

Examples & Analogies

Consider a well-maintained garden. If the gardener neglects some weeds (internal security), soon they will grow, overshadowing the flowers and impacting the overall beauty of the garden (the nation). Even if the garden looks fine from a distance (external security), the neglect will eventually show and might ruin it entirely.

Challenges of Traditional Security

Unlock Audio Book

Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book

The challenges faced today indicate that traditional security paradigms need to adapt. Threats are no longer confined solely to military aggression but also involve a plethora of internal and external influences.

Detailed Explanation

In modern times, the challenges to security are diverse and include not just military threats but also internal strife, terrorism, cyber threats, and environmental issues. Traditional security models that rely heavily on military approaches must evolve to address these multifaceted and complex threats, making it imperative for nations to adopt a broader view of security.

Examples & Analogies

Imagine a castle (representing a nation) that is only built to defend against outside invaders. If a fire breaks out within the castle walls (internal threat), the castle could still fall apart, irrespective of its strong defenses against outside forces. Thus, modern 'castles' must be equipped with resources to handle both external and internal challenges.

Definitions & Key Concepts

Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.

Key Concepts

  • Security: The concept of being protected from threats.

  • Traditional Security: Focused on military threats to state sovereignty.

  • Non-Traditional Security: Broader issues threatening human wellbeing.

  • Balance of Power: Preventing dominance of a single state through strategic alliances.

  • Human Security: Emphasizing protection of people over state interests.

Examples & Real-Life Applications

See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.

Examples

  • Military alliances like NATO work to prevent conflicts between member nations.

  • Health epidemics such as COVID-19 demonstrate global interdependence in managing health security.

Memory Aids

Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.

🎵 Rhymes Time

  • In state security, we see, threats from force, it must be free.

📖 Fascinating Stories

  • Imagine nations like village tribes, guard their homes from foreign bribes.

🧠 Other Memory Gems

  • S.H.A.R.P. - Security, Human, Alliances, Resources, Power.

🎯 Super Acronyms

T.H.E.M. - Traditional, Human, Economic, Military security.

Flash Cards

Review key concepts with flashcards.

Glossary of Terms

Review the Definitions for terms.

  • Term: Security

    Definition:

    The state of being free from danger or threat.

  • Term: Traditional Security

    Definition:

    Focuses on military threats and the protection of state sovereignty.

  • Term: NonTraditional Security

    Definition:

    Includes broader threats affecting human existence, such as health crises and environmental issues.

  • Term: Balance of Power

    Definition:

    A situation in which nations have equal strength, preventing any one nation from becoming too powerful.

  • Term: Human Security

    Definition:

    The protection of individuals and communities, focusing on their well-being over state interests.