Forms of Power-sharing
In democratic societies, power does not rest solely with a single entity; rather, it is dispersed among various organs of government, differing levels of governance, and social groups. This section examines the necessity and forms of power-sharing, particularly through the comparison of Belgium and Sri Lanka.
Key Points:
- Power-sharing is crucial for reducing conflicts among social groups, ensuring stability in governance, and promoting inclusive decision-making.
- In Belgium, multiple amendments to accommodate cultural differences have resulted in a successful power-sharing model between the Dutch-speaking and French-speaking communities.
- In contrast, Sri Lanka has grappled with majoritarianism, where the Sinhala-speaking majority sought dominance, leading to conflict and civil war.
- Power-sharing arrangements can be classified into four forms:
- Horizontal distribution among the branches of government (executive, legislature, judiciary).
- Vertical distribution among different levels of government (central vs. state governments).
- Distribution among social groups (e.g., community governments).
- Through competition among political parties to ensure diverse representation.
- The importance of power-sharing lies both in its prudential effects (promoting stability) and moral essence (democratic fairness and participation).
This section emphasizes that effective power-sharing can prevent the alienation of minority groups and conflict, thereby underlining its importance in democratic governance.