Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skillsβperfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
Youβve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Lesson
Today, we will discuss majoritarianism. Majoritarianism occurs when the majority community seeks to assert dominance over minority groups. Can anyone provide an example of how this may manifest in a country?
In Sri Lanka, the Sinhala language was made the only official language, impacting Tamil speakers.
Exactly! This act is a prime example of majoritarian policy, where the rights of the Tamil community were overlooked. Remember, βmajority rulesβ can sometimes mean βminority suffers.β
How did that make the Tamil people feel?
This fostered feelings of alienation among Tamils. So, to summarize: majoritarian policies can lead to conflict and resentment.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Lesson
What were some consequences of these majoritarian policies in Sri Lanka?
There was a lot of unrest and eventually a civil war.
Correct! The Tamils responded by demanding recognition of their rights. Can anyone explain what these demands included?
They wanted Tamil as an official language and more autonomy.
Perfect! Thus, we see how failing to address minority rights can escalate tensions. Remember this concept: 'Sharing power can lead to stability.'
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Lesson
Now, let's look at Belgium. What measures did they take to ensure harmony between their communities?
Belgium has equal representation for Dutch and French-speaking ministers.
Exactly! This approach helps prevent any single community from dominating. How does this differ from Sri Lankaβs situation?
Sri Lanka enforced policies that favored the majority rather than promoting equality.
Good observation! This difference highlights the importance of inclusive governance. To wrap up, what can we learn from these two countries?
Respect for all communities can help avoid conflict.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The section examines the emergence of majoritarianism in Sri Lanka post-independence in 1948, highlighting the Sinhala community's efforts to dominate through policies that marginalized the Tamil language and culture. It reflects on the consequences of these actions, notably the civil conflict, contrasting with Belgium's more inclusive power-sharing arrangements that have successfully mitigated tensions between its linguistic communities.
The independence of Sri Lanka in 1948 marked the beginning of significant political changes led by the Sinhala majority. Utilizing their numerical superiority, the leaders of the Sinhala community swiftly enacted policies aimed at establishing Sinhala dominance over the government. Notable measures included the 1956 Official Language Act which declared Sinhala as the only official language, effectively sidelining the Tamil language.
Further discriminatory practices included preferential treatment of Sinhala-speaking individuals in government employment and educational institutions, along with constitutional stipulations that promoted Buddhism as a protected state religion. These actions fostered a profound sense of alienation among Tamils, who perceived the political landscape as dismissive of their cultural identity and rights.
In contrast, Belgium provided a noteworthy example of successful power-sharing between its Dutch and French-speaking populations, which bolstered national unity. The contrasting trajectories of Sri Lanka and Belgium emphasize the critical importance of inclusive governance in diverse societies. Sri Lanka's failure to accommodate its minority groups ultimately escalated into a civil war, highlighting the destructive potential of unbridled majoritarianism.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Sri Lanka emerged as an independent country in 1948. The leaders of the Sinhala community sought to secure dominance over government by virtue of their majority. As a result, the democratically elected government adopted a series of majoritarian measures to establish Sinhala supremacy.
When Sri Lanka gained independence in 1948, the Sinhala leaders, who made up the majority of the population, aimed to take control of the government. They believed that being in the majority meant they should dominate political decisions. This led to the implementation of laws and practices that favored the Sinhala language and culture, reinforcing their position at the expense of minority groups.
Consider a classroom where one group of students frequently displays their work in a way that makes it the only focus, while the interests of other groups are overlooked. This can create frustration and feelings of alienation among those who feel ignored.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
In 1956, an Act was passed to recognise Sinhala as the only official language, thus disregarding Tamil. The governments followed preferential policies that favoured Sinhala applicants for university positions and government jobs. A new constitution stipulated that the state shall protect and foster Buddhism.
The 1956 Act made Sinhala the sole official language of Sri Lanka, which marginalized Tamil speakers. Educational and employment opportunities began to favor Sinhala-speaking individuals, leading to widespread resentment among Tamils. Additionally, the constitution's focus on Buddhism further alienated non-Buddhist communities, particularly Tamils.
Imagine a workplace where only one language is used for all communications and documentation, making it impossible for employees who speak another language to participate fully or advance in their careers.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
All these government measures, coming one after the other, gradually increased the feeling of alienation among the Sri Lankan Tamils. They felt that none of the major political parties led by the Buddhist Sinhala leaders was sensitive to their language and culture. They felt that the constitution and government policies denied them equal political rights, discriminated against them in getting jobs and other opportunities and ignored their interests.
Over time, the consistent discrimination against Tamils created a strong sense of alienation. They felt excluded from political processes and decision-making, which deepened their grievances against the state. This alienation stemmed not just from language barriers but also from a lack of representation and fairness in opportunities.
Think of a sports team where only certain players get to make decisions and practice in their preferred positions, while others are sidelined. This can lead to dissatisfaction and a struggle for recognition among the overlooked players.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
The relations between the Sinhala and Tamil communities strained over time. The Sri Lankan Tamils launched parties and struggles for the recognition of Tamil as an official language, for regional autonomy and equality of opportunity in securing education and jobs. But their demand for more autonomy to provinces populated by the Tamils was repeatedly denied. By the 1980s, several political organisations were formed demanding an independent Tamil Eelam (state) in northern and eastern parts of Sri Lanka.
As frustrations mounted, Tamils began to organize politically and demand rights and recognition. Their calls for Tamil to be an official language and for more control over regions where they lived were dismissed by the government, leading to increased tensions and conflict. Eventually, this culminated in the demand for an independent state, Tamil Eelam.
Consider a protest where a group continuously asks for a voice in decisions that affect them but is ignored repeatedly. Eventually, their frustration could lead to more drastic efforts to make their demands heard.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
The distrust between the two communities turned into widespread conflict. It soon turned into a civil war. As a result thousands of people of both the communities have been killed. Many families were forced to leave the country as refugees and many more lost their livelihoods. The civil war has caused a terrible setback to the social, cultural and economic life of the country. It ended in 2009.
The ongoing distrust and refusal to acknowledge Tamil aspirations escalated into a full-blown civil war, causing extensive devastation and loss of life. The protracted conflict dislocated families and devastated the economic structure, drastically altering the nationβs fabric.
Similar to a neighborhood feud where clashes lead to destruction and the displacement of families, the civil war in Sri Lanka caused lasting scars on its people and society.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
What do we learn from these two stories of Belgium and Sri Lanka? Both are democracies. Yet, they dealt with the question of power sharing differently. In Belgium, the leaders have realised that the unity of the country is possible only by respecting the feelings and interests of different communities and regions. Such a realisation resulted in mutually acceptable arrangements for sharing power. Sri Lanka shows us a contrasting example. It shows us that if a majority community wants to force its dominance over others and refuses to share power, it can undermine the unity of the country.
The experiences of Belgium and Sri Lanka teach us that effective power sharing is crucial for maintaining peace and unity in a diverse society. Belgium's approach emphasizes inclusion and respect for all communities, while Sri Lanka's majoritarianism led to conflict and division. Understanding these dynamics is essential for fostering harmony in multicultural nations.
Think of a group project where members must collaborate. If one member tries to dominate and makes all decisions without consulting others, resentment builds, and the project could fail. Collaboration and shared decision-making typically lead to better outcomes.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Majoritarianism: The struggle between majority and minority communities.
Alienation: The state of feeling disconnected from the political system.
Civil War: A conflict triggered by political exclusion and ethnic tensions.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
In 1956, Sri Lanka declared Sinhala as the only official language, sidelining Tamil speakers.
The Belgian government ensures equal representation for its linguistic communities to avoid conflict.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
In Sri Lanka, Sinhala said, 'Our language first, the Tamils fled'.
Imagine a land where one group decides all rules without listening to others, leading to conflict. This was Sri Lanka's path.
CATS: Civil war, Alienation, Tamil, Sinhalese - key aspects of the Sri Lankan conflict.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Majoritarianism
Definition:
A political belief that the majority community should dominate governance, often at the expense of minority communities.
Term: Ethnic Communities
Definition:
Social groups categorized by shared culture, language, or common descent.
Term: Alienation
Definition:
The feeling of being isolated or estranged from a group or community.
Term: Civil War
Definition:
A violent conflict between different factions or groups within the same country.