Professional Courses
Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Categories
Interactive Games
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skillsβperfect for learners of all ages.
Typing
Memory
Math
English Adventures
Knowledge
Introduction & Overview
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
Quick Overview
Standard
The 'pass by name' approach allows functions to use expressions that are re-evaluated in the caller's context each time they are accessed, leading to potential complexities and side effects. Most notably used in Algol 60, pass by name offers advantages like delayed evaluation but also presents challenges in terms of predictability.
Detailed
Pass by Name (The 'Macro-like' Substitution - Historical Context)
In programming, parameter passing is crucial for how data is shared between functions. One interesting method of parameter passing is Pass by Name, which is most famously implemented in the programming language Algol 60. This approach passes an expression (sometimes termed a thunk or closure) rather than a value or a fixed reference.
Key Features:
- Evaluation on Demand: Every time the formal parameter is used within the function, the original argument expression is evaluated anew in its caller's environment. This creates a unique behavior whereby variable values can change on each access, allowing for a more dynamic interaction but complicating reasoning and debugging.
- Implementation: Instead of merely passing values or addresses, the compiler generates code that evaluates the argument expression on demand, fitting it into the functionβs execution context. The evaluation can trigger cascading effects if the variables involved are modified elsewhere.
- Applications and Complexity: This method leads to delayed evaluation (also termed
Audio Book
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Core Principle of Pass by Name
Unlock Audio Book
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
This mechanism (most famously used in Algol 60) doesn't pass a value or a fixed reference. Instead, it effectively passes an expression (a "thunk" or "closure") that represents the actual argument. Every time the formal parameter is accessed within the called function, the actual argument expression is re-evaluated in the caller's environment (scope).
Detailed Explanation
The core principle of 'pass by name' is that the argument passed to a function is not a simple value or reference; it is an expression. This expression gets re-evaluated every time it is used in the function. The function receives a 'thunk', which is a piece of code that encapsulates this expression. This means that if there are any changes to the variables in the calling context that are used in the expression, those changes will impact the evaluation within the called function.
Examples & Analogies
Imagine a student writing a report that includes an up-to-date stock price from a financial application. Each time the report is printed (function called), it fetches the latest stock price (evaluates the expression) rather than using a fixed number. If the stock price changes while the report is being printed, the most recent price is utilized, instead of the price at the time the report was written.
Mechanism of Pass by Name
Unlock Audio Book
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Instead of computing a value or an address at the call site, the compiler generates a small piece of code (often called a "thunk") that, when executed, will compute the value of the actual argument. This "thunk" (and the environment in which it should be evaluated) is passed to the called function. Inside the called function, whenever the formal parameter is used, this "thunk" is invoked, causing the original actual argument expression to be evaluated again.
Detailed Explanation
In 'pass by name', the compiler doesn't just pass the value or a reference; instead, it creates a small block of code called a 'thunk'. This thunk knows how to compute the value of the argument whenever needed. When the function accesses the parameter, it invokes this thunk, leading to the expression being computed in the caller's scope. This method ensures that every access to the parameter can reflect any changes in the variables that the expression relies on.
Examples & Analogies
Think of a TV remote that, instead of just changing channels, can pull up the most current news updates from the internet every time you press the button. Each time the button is pressed (parameter accessed), it fetches the latest news rather than a single pre-recorded report. If something dynamic happens in the world between button presses, you see updates, just like how re-evaluated expressions reflect current variable states in pass by name.
Behavior and Implications
Unlock Audio Book
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
This leads to a "call-by-need" or "lazy evaluation" semantic. The argument is only evaluated when it's actually used. More importantly, if the actual argument expression involves variables that change between different evaluations, the parameter's "value" will also change dynamically within the function. This is the source of its power and its notorious complexity.
Detailed Explanation
The 'pass by name' mechanism introduces a unique evaluation feature known as 'call-by-need'. This means expressions are only evaluated when they are invoked by the function. If the underlying variables change, so will the result of the expression on each evaluation. While this allows for powerful programming constructs, it also introduces complexity since a developer has to consider how variable changes in the caller can unexpectedly affect computations in the callee.
Examples & Analogies
Imagine you have a recipe that calls for a specific measurement of an ingredient, but instead of fixing that amount, each time you consult the recipe, you go to the pantry and measure out whatever is there at that moment. If you use a different ingredient or the amount fluctuates between servings, the dish you end up with can vary significantly from one meal to the next, illustrating how dynamic evaluations work in pass by name.
Complexity and Predictability Issues
Unlock Audio Book
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
The dynamic re-evaluation makes it extremely difficult to reason about and debug, especially when side effects are involved. It can lead to surprising and subtle bugs. Performance Overhead: Repeated re-evaluation of complex expressions can be less efficient than evaluating them once and passing the result.
Detailed Explanation
One of the biggest challenges of pass by name is the complexity it brings to debugging and reasoning about code. Since the expression may change upon each evaluation, developers can encounter unexpected behavior that is difficult to trace, particularly if the expression has side effectsβchanges made to variables outside its own scope. Additionally, continuously evaluating complex expressions can lead to performance issues compared to evaluating them once and using the stored result.
Examples & Analogies
Consider a factory assembly line where each part is inspected every time it moves down the line instead of being inspected once at the start. While this ensures you're always working with the latest part status, it can slow down production due to redundancy, and issues may arise if the inspection processes inadvertently alter the parts or cause unexpected delays, much like how dynamic evaluations can complicate program performance and outcomes.
Rarity in Modern Languages
Unlock Audio Book
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Due to its complexity and the availability of clearer alternatives (like explicit closures, lambda functions, or specialized lazy evaluation constructs), pass-by-name is almost never the default or primary mechanism in modern mainstream programming languages.
Detailed Explanation
Despite its historical significance, pass by name has largely fallen out of favor in modern programming languages due to its inherent complexity and unpredictability. Nowadays, languages often provide simpler, more predictable mechanisms, such as closures and lambda functions. These alternatives allow developers to encapsulate behavior in a way that minimizes surprises while still leveraging the benefits of delayed computing without the pitfalls that pass by name introduces.
Examples & Analogies
Imagine opting for a microwave with a single button for reheats versus a vintage oven that requires precise settings for every mealβmost people prefer the microwave for its efficiency and ease of use. Just as modern kitchen appliances aim for straightforward functionality, programming languages have also evolved to favor efficient, maintainable mechanisms over more complex legacy options like pass by name.