Practice Control Signal Mechanism - 26.5.1 | 26. Execution of Macro Instructions | Computer Organisation and Architecture - Vol 2
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What is a control signal in computing?

💡 Hint: Think of it as a guiding instruction.

Question 2

Easy

Describe micro instructions.

💡 Hint: Relate this to the execution of individual commands.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What defines a control signal?

  • It indicates operations in a microprocessor
  • It is used for user input
  • It measures processing speed

💡 Hint: Think about what directs the processor's actions.

Question 2

True or False: Implicit jumps are always explicitly indicated in the instructions.

  • True
  • False

💡 Hint: Consider how decisions are made in micro routines.

Solve 1 more question and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Design a set of micro instructions for a new macro instruction that incorporates a jump when a specific flag is set. Explain how control signals would guide the execution.

💡 Hint: Think about how flag conditions influence decision-making paths.

Question 2

Analyze a given pseudo code involving multiple jumps. Identify how you could optimize the micro routine for efficiency.

💡 Hint: Identify patterns in the jumps to see how they can share common micro instruction sets.

Challenge and get performance evaluation