Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Today, we're going to start talking about how to analyze the costs associated with keeping our current equipment, the Defender, versus replacing it with a new Challenger. Can anyone tell me why we must compare these costs?
To see which one is cheaper to keep overall?
Exactly! We need to look at both annual operating costs and salvage values. Since our Defender's operational cost is INR 1,35,000, do you remember what the Challenger's cost is?
It's INR 90,000, right?
Yes! That's a significant difference. Let's remember with the acronym 'COST'—Current, Operating, Salvage, Time—these are the key parts we need to consider.
Now, let’s discuss something called sunk costs. Who can tell me what a sunk cost is?
It's money that has already been spent and can't be recovered?
Correct! In our analysis, things like the initial purchase price of the Defender, which was INR 35,00,000, are not considered because they are sunk costs. We only care about current values. Why is it important to ignore sunk costs?
Because they don't affect our future decisions?
Exactly! It’s essential to focus on the costs that will influence our decision moving forward. So, remember: 'Don’t get weighed down by the past!'
Let's calculate the Equivalent Annual Cost of the Defender now. We start with the current market value of INR 22,50,000. We need the current price, operating costs, and the salvage value.
How do we convert the current trading value into EAC?
Great question! We use the Uniform Series Capital Recovery Factor. With our interest at 10% and a lifespan of 5 years, we find a factor value of 0.2638. So the EAC is INR 22,50,000 times 0.2638.
And what do we get from that?
That gives us INR 5,93,550 for the initial cost. Let’s add the operating cost now! Who remembers what that was?
That’s INR 1,35,000!
Exactly! Add that, and now we need to factor in the salvage value. What should we remember when considering it?
We need to convert it into EAC as well!
Right! We will again use the Sinking Fund Factor method to find the salvage value annualized cost. This is key for our overall EAC!
Now we’re ready to compare the total EAC for both machines! After our calculations, Defender’s EAC is INR 6,30,270, while the Challenger's is INR 6,18,890. What does this tell us?
It looks like the Challenger is cheaper to operate!
Exactly! The lower EAC means less cost liability for us. If we were to advise the construction company, what would you recommend?
We should replace the Defender with the Challenger!
Exactly! You’ve all grasped this concept well. Just remember the key acronym—COST—as we consider all relevant costs!
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The section describes the process of evaluating whether to retain or replace an existing piece of equipment, referred to as the Defender, with a proposed machine, the Challenger. It introduces key financial concepts such as operating costs, salvage values, and the importance of the Equivalent Annual Cost calculation in making sound economic choices concerning machinery replacement.
In this section, we delve into the comparative analysis of two equipment pieces: the Defender (existing) and the Challenger (proposed). We assess their operational and maintenance costs, salvage values, and ultimately calculate their Equivalent Annual Costs (EAC) to guide the decision on whether to retain or replace the Defender. The Defender has a higher operational cost (INR 1,35,000) than the Challenger (INR 90,000), but other factors like the current market value for both machines and their respective salvage values after a five-year period are also considered. By neglecting irrelevant costs such as initial purchase prices and sunk costs, we derive a clear picture of the financial implications associated with each machine, leading to an informed recommendation based on the lower EAC. The ultimate conclusion advises replacing the Defender with the Challenger, as its EAC reveals a lower cost liability.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, this is all about your defender that is the current equipment. Now let us discuss about the challenger, that is a proposed equipment. The challenger's annual operating and maintenance cost is 90,000. So, you can see that it is lesser than your old equipment, so lesser than your defender. So, the defender operating and maintenance cost is 1,35,000 but your challenger operating cost is 90,000, so it is lesser.
In this chunk, we compare the operating and maintenance costs of two pieces of equipment: the defender, which is the existing machine, and the challenger, which is the proposed new machine. The defender costs 135,000 annually for operating and maintenance, while the challenger costs only 90,000 annually. This means that maintaining the challenger will save money compared to the defender, providing a strong financial reason to consider replacing the defender.
Think of it like choosing between an old, less fuel-efficient car and a new, more fuel-efficient model. You can save money on fuel over time with the new model, just as you would save on maintenance with the challenger.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
For the replacement analysis, as I told you your initial estimates should be ignored or neglected, they are not relevant. Your initial purchase price 35,00,000 it should not be considered in the replacement analysis. And similarly your initial estimate of salvage value 7,00,000 is should not be considered.
In a replacement analysis, it's crucial to focus on current costs and savings rather than past expenses. For example, the original purchase price of the defender (35,00,000) and the initial salvage value (7,00,000) are historical data that do not influence the decision about whether to keep or replace the existing equipment. Instead, one should look at ongoing expenses and future benefits.
Imagine you are deciding whether to keep your old smartphone. The price you paid for it originally doesn’t matter; what matters is how much you spend to keep it running versus how much a new phone would cost you in the long run.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now for the existing equipment that is defender what are all relevant in the replacement analysis or what are all to be considered in the replacement analysis, let us see that. Current market value is 22,50,000, this is your initial cost of your the first cost of your defender, this is what we are going to consider, what is your current trading value of the machine in the market.
When conducting a replacement analysis, we must look at specific relevant costs. For the defender, the current market value is 22,50,000, which represents what you could sell the equipment for today. This value is more pertinent than historical costs because it reflects the real economic conditions affecting the equipment.
If you were selling a used car, knowing its market value today would be essential for anyone considering a trade-in. You’d want to know how much money you could get for it now rather than what you originally paid.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, based upon this you are supposed to calculate the equivalent annual cost of the defender. We are going to estimate the equivalent annual cost of the defender. So, for that you need to draw the cash flow diagram. Let us draw the cash flow diagram and do the analysis.
To find the equivalent annual cost (EAC) of the defender, we need to consider all relevant costs and represent them in a cash flow diagram. This diagram will help graphically show the initial cost, annual operating costs, any potential salvage value at the end of its useful life, and how these numbers will contribute to the overall financial evaluation.
Think of this as creating a budget for your household expenses. You'd list your income (cash inflows) and expenses (cash outflows) in a visual way to get a clearer picture of your finances.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, how to estimate the equivalent annual cost? You are going to convert these values all this values to time period of t = 0. So, what you do is, your initial cost of the defender, initial cost of the defender is 22,50,000. So, this one you are going to converted into equivalent annual cost, this is already at t = 0 only.
To calculate the EAC, we take the initial cost of the defender (22,50,000) and convert it to an annual amount using a financial formula, factoring in the interest rate (10% in this case) and the number of years (5). This will give us the annualized equivalent cost of the investment in the defender over its useful life.
This is similar to calculating your monthly payment when you take out a loan. The total amount borrowed is spread out over the term of the loan, plus interest, to determine how much you need to pay each month.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now let us go to the salvage value, I need to convert this salvage value into equivalent annual cost. So, you can do it by 2 approaches as I told you can use the uniform series sinking fund factor. You can use uniform series sinking fund factor and convert it into equivalent annual cost.
When estimating the EAC, we also need to consider the salvage value at the end of the equipment's life. This value can be annualized using a uniform series sinking fund factor, which allows us to determine how much this future cash inflow is worth in today’s terms on an annual basis.
If you plan to sell your car after a few years, you might estimate its future value and factor that into your budget. This is similar to planning for future savings by considering how much money you will need to set aside each month to reach a savings goal for an expected future event.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, when you simplify you will get this value. So, the annualize initial cost of the defender is 5,93,550, this is your outflow. Your operating cost is your cash outflow 1,35,000 add both the cash outflows, you will get the total outflow, then what is your inflow?
After calculating the EAC for the initial cost and the annual operating cost, we add these amounts together to get the total cash outflows for holding the defender. Next, we remember that at the end of 5 years, we will receive a salvage value, which is subtracted from the total outflow to find out the net annual cost of keeping the defender.
When you calculate your total expenses at the end of the month, you summarize all your bills (cash outflows) and then consider any money you receive back, like a paycheck or investment, to determine your net spending.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, in this case, the challenger cost liability is minimum, so it is preferable to replace a defender with the challenger.
After analyzing both pieces of equipment, we find that the total equivalent annual cost of the defender is greater than that of the challenger. Therefore, it is financially advisable to replace the defender with the challenger in order to reduce operating and maintenance costs, leading to better overall financial health for the organization.
Choosing to upgrade to a more efficient appliance in your home, like an energy-efficient refrigerator, can save you on electricity costs, resulting in lower monthly bills.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Equivalent Annual Cost: A method used to evaluate the total cost of ownership of an asset over its useful life.
Sunk Cost: Costs that should be ignored in decision-making due to irrecoverability.
Operating Costs: Regular expenses incurred through the operation of equipment which affect overall economic evaluation.
Salvage Value: The estimated amount received from selling an asset when it is no longer useful.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
An example could be comparing two delivery trucks where Truck A costs $30,000 in operating yearly and has a salvage value of $5,000, while Truck B costs $20,000 yearly with a salvage value of $10,000.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
COST means current, operating, salvage, time—what to consider to make the cost just fine!
Imagine a business that has an outdated truck. Every year it spends too much on repairs and has no resale value. When it calculates, it finds new trucks cheaper, leading to a smarter purchase decision.
Don't Include Silly Past Costs (for Sunk Costs)!
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Equivalent Annual Cost (EAC)
Definition:
A calculation used to compare the annualized cost of different projects or equipment over their lifespan.
Term: Sunk Cost
Definition:
A cost that has already been incurred and cannot be recovered.
Term: Operating Cost
Definition:
The ongoing expenses for running equipment including maintenance and operational inefficiencies.
Term: Salvage Value
Definition:
The estimated resale value of an asset at the end of its useful life.
Term: Uniform Series Capital Recovery Factor
Definition:
A factor used to calculate the annual cost of an investment over its lifespan considering the time value of money.
Term: Time Value of Money
Definition:
The concept that money available today is worth more than the same amount in the future due to its potential earning capacity.