Practice Evolution of DFT with Modern ICs and SoCs (2010s – Present) - 2.5 | 2. Historical Context and Evolution of Testability Strategies | Design for Testability
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What does at-speed testing help identify?

💡 Hint: Think about testing under actual operating conditions.

Question 2

Easy

What is one advantage of test compression?

💡 Hint: Consider efficiency.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What is the primary benefit of at-speed testing?

  • It reduces test data
  • Identifies timing-related faults
  • Increases the complexity of tests

💡 Hint: Remember, testing speed matters!

Question 2

True or False: Test minimization eliminates the need for any test patterns.

  • True
  • False

💡 Hint: Think about what minimization means.

Solve 1 more question and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Outline a comprehensive testing plan for a new multi-core SoC that employs both at-speed testing and advanced fault modeling. What factors would you consider?

💡 Hint: Consider the architecture and critical aspects of the system.

Question 2

How does the implementation of test compression impact the software tools used in the testing phase? Discuss potential advantages and drawbacks.

💡 Hint: Think of how changing data sizes could affect handling and processing.

Challenge and get performance evaluation