Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Let's begin by understanding what a hazard is. A hazard is a natural or human-induced event that can cause harm. Can anyone give me an example of a hazard?
An earthquake is a hazard.
Flooding is also a hazard.
Exactly! Both earthquakes and floods can cause significant damage. Remember, hazards become risks when there is exposure and vulnerability present. Let's move on.
Next, let's discuss exposure. Exposure refers to the people and property at risk when a hazard occurs. Why do you think understanding exposure is crucial in disaster risk assessment?
Because if more people are in harm's way, the potential for disaster is higher.
So, exposure is about location and population density?
Correct! More people in hazardous areas increases disaster risk. Always remember the acronym 'HEV' for Hazard, Exposure, and Vulnerability. It helps to link them!
Now, let’s talk about vulnerability. Vulnerability indicates how likely it is that people will be adversely affected by a hazard. What factors can influence vulnerability?
Economic status can affect vulnerability, as poorer communities might not be able to prepare as well.
Health and accessibility also play a role in vulnerability!
Excellent points! Vulnerability varies by social structures, economic capacity, and infrastructure. By recognizing this, we can design better recovery strategies. Let's summarize the key points.
To apply what we've discussed, imagine a landslide in a rural and then urban setting. How does risk change between these scenarios?
In a rural area, there may be fewer people, but if someone is there, the risk is high!
In an urban area, there are more people exposed, so risks are much higher.
Exactly! Context matters significantly. Understanding HEV helps us comprehend these differences.
As we conclude, remember that understanding hazard, exposure, and vulnerability—collectively referred to as HEV forms the foundation of disaster risk assessment. How do you all feel about these concepts?
They’re very interconnected!
I see how important it is to consider context in disaster planning.
Great insights! Addressing these can guide us in disaster recovery and ensuring we 'Build Back Better'!
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The section explores how disaster risk is assessed based on three core components: hazards, exposure, and vulnerability. Examples illustrate how these factors can change the level of risk in different scenarios, particularly emphasizing the significance of context and human presence.
In this section, we delve into the critical components that define disaster risk: hazards, exposure, and vulnerability. The concept of hazard refers to any condition or event that has the potential to cause harm, while exposure pertains to the degree to which people, infrastructure, and livelihoods are in harm's way. Vulnerability describes the susceptibility of the exposed elements to the impacts of a hazard. The interplay of these components ultimately determines the overall disaster risk. Through various examples, including the risks associated with natural occurrences in the Himalayas, the discussion emphasizes how context (time of day, human presence, and settlement patterns) can shift risk assessments. This contextual awareness is crucial for understanding disaster recovery and the principles of 'Build Back Better'.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Hello everyone, we are talking about lecture course on disaster recovery and build back better. I am Subhajyoti Samaddar, from Disaster Prevention Research Institute(DPRI), Kyoto University. In this lecture, we will talk about disaster risk considering 3 components; one is hazard, exposure, and vulnerability. so, we will give some small examples; illustrations with some theoretical ideas to define the very core aspect of disaster risk.
In this introduction, the speaker emphasizes that the core focus of the lecture is on understanding disaster risk. He introduces the three primary components that contribute to disaster risk: hazard, exposure, and vulnerability. Each of these components plays a critical role in defining how risks are assessed and managed in disaster contexts. The speaker also mentions that examples and illustrations will be provided to clarify these concepts, making them easier to understand.
Consider a city that is prone to earthquakes. The building structures represent the 'hazard' because they can be damaged during an earthquake. 'Exposure' refers to the people living or working in these buildings, as they are the ones at risk. Lastly, 'vulnerability' reflects how well these buildings can withstand earthquakes; older buildings might be more vulnerable than newer, fortified ones.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Let us imagine that this is a place near Roorkee in Uttarakhand; it could be a tourist spot, people coming here watching this mystic stone in a mountain well now, considering this slide is it risky? Does it look like that this could be fatal for the people, should you consider this is as disaster or disaster risk? Now, how about that if there is one individual is there; working there on the foothills, should you consider it more risky than the before one?
This chunk invites the audience to visualize a scenario in Uttarakhand. It prompts questions about the risk associated with natural hazards, such as a falling stone from a mountain. The focus is on understanding the context of risk based on the presence of individuals. If there is no one present, the risk is lower, but with one person working nearby, the risk significantly increases. This demonstrates how exposure can elevate disaster risk, even with the same hazard.
Imagine a cliffside tourist attraction. If no visitors are around, a rock falling might not be a big concern. However, if a tourist is sitting directly below the cliff, the risk of injury or disaster unfolds dramatically. This scenario illustrates how exposure to hazards can change the level of perceived risk.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now, look at the next slide, so if there is a rain then, there is a possibility that this stone would hit this person so yes, we consider this is as risky. But if it is like that maybe in a mountain when there is no human being and this stone falling down on a forest, do you consider it as risky; a disaster?
In this segment, the speaker elaborates on the relationship between hazard and potential consequences. The presence of rain introduces the possibility of a stone falling and hitting a person, thus heightening risk. The speaker then contrasts this with a scenario in which the stone falls into a forest, highlighting that the absence of human exposure reduces the perceived risk of disaster. This illustrates that disaster risk is not merely about hazards but also intricately linked to human exposure.
Think of a scenario where road work is happening on a mountain. If it rains, loose stones can fall and endanger workers nearby. On the other hand, if those stones only fall in a remote forest, while it might be dangerous to wildlife, it isn’t a ‘disaster’ in a human context. This shows how the same event poses different risks based on human presence.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
If we have avalanches, landslides in Himalayas, do we consider these events as disasters? But maybe if it is not in a remote mountain but people are living there, settlements are there compared to that top one, if we consider the bottom one to us, it is more risky than the top one.
This chunk connects specific types of natural hazards, such as avalanches and landslides, to their potential impact on human settlements. The key point is that an event which might be benign in a remote area becomes a disaster when it occurs where people live. The increase in human exposure ties directly to an increase in risk assessment, emphasizing that the context of the event matters significantly.
Picture a village nestled in the foothills of the Himalayas. An avalanche that rolls down the mountainside in a remote area might be just a natural occurrence, but if it reaches the village and endangers homes and lives, it transforms into a disaster. This illustrates how the same hazard can lead to dramatically different outcomes based purely on human exposure.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Maybe, we are more concerned, when there are more settlements are there. If this is happening; this landslide at night time. And if this landslide is happening at day time, we have different concerns and different way of measuring risk.
In this segment, the focus shifts to the timing of a hazard's occurrence, specifically a landslide. The speaker suggests that risks can be heightened at night when people are asleep compared to daytime when individuals are likely to be active. This introduces the concept of temporal vulnerability, where the risk associated with a hazard can vary significantly based on the time when it happens.
Consider a neighborhood prone to landslides. A landslide occurring during the day might catch people’s attention, allowing them to evacuate or move to safety. Conversely, if the landslide happens at night while most residents are asleep, the chance for injuries or fatalities greatly increases due to vulnerability being highest when people are least aware or prepared.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
But if this same thing is happening in an urban place in a city area what happens?
The discussion concludes by shifting focus to urban areas. The implication is that urban settings, with their dense population and infrastructure, could exacerbate the effects of natural hazards like landslides or other disasters. The proximity of people and structures leads to a heightened awareness and potential for disaster, further emphasizing the need for understanding risk in diverse contexts.
Think of a city built on the outskirts of a mountain range. If a landslide were to happen there, numerous lives could be at risk all at once compared to a remote area. It’s as if the same event suddenly becomes more dangerous simply because many people are present and vulnerable in close proximity.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Hazards: Events with the potential for harm.
Exposure: The presence of people or assets in hazardous areas.
Vulnerability: The predisposition to be affected by hazards.
Disaster Risk: The chance of harmful outcomes from a hazard.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
A landslide occurring in a populated area poses a higher disaster risk than in a remote area.
Nighttime landslides are riskier than those during the day due to people sleeping at home.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
When hazards strike and exposure's high, vulnerability may make people cry.
In a town near a mountain, a stone might fall during the day when many are okay, but at night when sleep they take, the risk is higher; lives might shake.
H-E-V: Hazards, Exposure, Vulnerability - keep them in mind when assessing disaster probability.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Hazard
Definition:
Any event that has the potential to cause harm or damage.
Term: Exposure
Definition:
The degree to which people, property, and livelihoods are in harm's way.
Term: Vulnerability
Definition:
The susceptibility of the exposed elements to impact from hazards.
Term: Disaster Risk
Definition:
The potential for losses and damages caused by interactions between hazards, exposure, and vulnerability.