Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Today we're discussing disaster risks. It comprises three fundamental components: hazard, exposure, and vulnerability. Can anyone define what these terms mean in the context of risk?
Hazard is a natural event that has the potential to cause harm.
Exposure refers to the people and assets at risk due to the hazard.
Correct! And how about vulnerability? How does it contribute to risk?
Vulnerability is about the susceptibility of people or structures to be harmed.
Exactly! Remember the acronym HEV: Hazard, Exposure, Vulnerability. Understanding these components helps us assess disaster risks effectively.
Let's discuss how human settlements impact disaster risk. How does the presence of people change the perception of risk?
More people means more exposure to hazards like landslides or avalanches.
And if more people live in danger-prone areas, their overall vulnerability increases too.
Great points! The density of a settlement and the characteristics of the area significantly influence risk. For example, a landslide in a remote mountain poses less risk than in a populated area.
Does the time of day matter? I mean, are people more at risk at night?
Absolutely! Nighttime landslides pose higher risks as people are typically indoors. This underscores the importance of context in risk assessment. Let's wrap this session with one key takeaway: settlement characteristics can either mitigate or aggravate disaster risks.
Let’s analyze different scenarios regarding landslides and their risks. What do you think happens when a landslide occurs in a densely populated urban area compared to a remote region?
I think in urban regions, more people would be affected, increasing potential casualties.
Also, there's more infrastructure, which means more economic loss.
Well said! In urban settings, the stakes are significantly higher. But, what about the social and economic structures? How do they play into vulnerability?
People in poorer urban areas may have less means to recover, making them more vulnerable.
Exactly! Recovery and resilience depend heavily on socioeconomic factors. Remember that understanding disaster risk is not just about the events themselves but about the people living in those contexts.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
This section examines the interaction of hazards, exposure, and vulnerability in determining disaster risk, particularly in areas with human settlements. It highlights how the presence of people changes the risk landscape, using examples of natural events like landslides and avalanches in urban versus remote settings to illustrate these dynamics.
This section delves into the multifaceted nature of disaster risk by emphasizing the elements of hazard, exposure, and vulnerability as they relate to human settlements. The presence of settlements can escalate risks during natural disasters due to increased exposure to hazards and heightened vulnerability stemming from socioeconomic factors.
For instance, the lecture presents a scenario near Roorkee, Uttarakhand, illustrating that a seemingly tranquil place, when populated, becomes riskier during hazardous events like landslides and avalanches. Factors such as the time of day (daytime versus nighttime) also affect risk levels where human activity directly correlates with exposure. The concept of risk is underscored through interactive discussions of how context, including settlement density and time of occurrence, shapes disaster scenarios.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Let us imagine that this is a place near Roorkee in Uttarakhand; it could be a tourist spot, people coming here watching this mystic stone in a mountain well now, considering this slide is it risky? Does it look like that this could be fatal for the people, should you consider this is as disaster or disaster risk? Now, how about that if there is one individual is there; working there on the foothills, should you consider it more risky than the before one?
In this chunk, we are examining how the presence of individuals in a specific location can affect their risk from natural hazards. First, we think about a tourist spot where a stone might fall. If no one is around, we might not see it as a significant risk. However, if a person is present, especially working at the foothills, the risk escalates. This highlights the principle that individual exposure to hazards modifies our perception of risk.
Imagine a school situated near a cliff. If the cliff erodes and no students are present, it doesn't feel urgent. However, when school is in session and children are nearby, the risk suddenly feels much greater, prompting immediate safety measures.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
If we have avalanches, landslides in Himalayas, do we consider these events as disasters? But maybe if it is not in a remote mountain but people are living there, settlements are there compared to that top one, if we consider the bottom one to us, it is more risky than the top one.
This chunk discusses how the context of natural events like avalanches and landslides can shift our definition of disaster. In isolation, these events may seem routine; however, if they occur in populated areas with human settlements, they become much more significant in terms of risk and potential disaster. The presence of a community increases the stakes, making what might otherwise seem minor into a significant threat.
Consider a small town on a hillside. A landslide might be a normal occurrence in the mountains, but if it happens near homes, schools, and businesses, it becomes a disaster scenario, like trying to ignore a small fire in a building when there are lots of people inside.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Maybe, we are more concerned, when there are more settlements are there. If this is happening; this landslide at night time. And if this landslide is happening at day time, we have different concerns and different way of measuring risk. So, we considered that night time may be more risky because people are sleeping there.
This chunk emphasizes how the time of day affects risk perception. Nighttime landslides pose a greater risk as people are typically unaware and unprepared, while a daytime occurrence may allow for greater awareness and preventative action. The availability of light and activity levels at different times can drastically shift how we assess danger.
Think of a car breakdown. If your car fails in the middle of the day, you can easily flag down help, but if it breaks down at night on a deserted road, your situation becomes much more perilous. The time of day dramatically affects the level of risk.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
But if this same thing is happening in an urban place in a city area what happens?
Here, we are considering how risk dynamics change in urban environments compared to rural settings. In cities, the density of population and proximity to infrastructure like roads and buildings may alter how quickly and effectively people can respond to disasters. The interconnectedness of urban life means that a disaster can escalate more quickly, and the impacts might be more widespread.
Imagine a flood in a rural town where people can evacuate to higher ground relatively easily. In contrast, a flood in a city can cause gridlock, trapping people in their homes and making rescue efforts more complicated. The same hazard creates very different risks based on the environment.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Disaster Risk: The potential for loss or damage as a result of a hazard interacting with exposure and vulnerability.
Human Settlements: The built environments where people live and the impact they have on disaster risk.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
A landslide occurring in a remote area may affect minimal wildlife but poses no risk to human life, whereas the same event in an urban area would endanger lives and property.
Nights featuring landslides can result in significantly higher risks than daytime occurrences due to household occupants being asleep.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
Holidays bring big smiles, but remember the risks, dear pal; hazards lurk in hidden aisles, exposure means to face the trial.
Once in a peaceful village, the rains fell hard. A landslide came, it startled all. The village was sleeping, unaware of the hazard. In daylight, they would have seen, but at night, their absence was a flaw.
HEV: H for Hazard, E for Exposure, V for Vulnerability - remember this trio for disaster risk!
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Hazard
Definition:
A natural event that has the potential to cause harm.
Term: Exposure
Definition:
The presence of people and assets in potentially dangerous locations.
Term: Vulnerability
Definition:
The susceptibility of a community, asset, or system to the adverse effects of hazards.