Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Let's start with the trends of disaster events from 1950 to 2005. What patterns do you think we observe?
I think floods and storms have increased a lot, right?
Yes, exactly! Floods and storms have indeed shown a marked increase. But what about earthquakes?
Earthquakes seem to have stayed almost the same, right?
That's correct! Understanding these trends helps us recognize where our focus on disaster management needs to be, particularly around more frequent disasters.
Now let's talk about exposure. Can anyone define what 'exposure' means in the context of disaster risks?
Does it mean how many people or buildings are at risk from a hazard?
Absolutely! Exposure refers to the people, structures, and assets in a hazard-prone area. The more presence we have, the greater the risk.
So if a landslide happens in a dense city, it’s much more concerning than in a forest?
Exactly! The context of where a hazard occurs can greatly influence the concern surrounding it.
Moving on to vulnerability, what factors do you think could influence how vulnerable people are during a disaster?
I think age can make a difference. Older people might be more at risk.
Great insight! Age is a significant factor. Vulnerability can also be influenced by economic status, type of housing, and density of population. It’s crucial to assess these factors for effective disaster risk management.
So, if we have an area with a lot of old people in poor housing, that’s a really risky situation?
Exactly! The characteristics of the population and their environment define the risk level.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
This section highlights the significance of understanding disaster risks through the lens of exposure to hazards. It outlines how increased human settlements in hazard-prone areas heighten risks, differentiating between types of disasters based on their impacts on vulnerable populations and structures.
In this section, we delve into the topic of disaster risks, analyzing trends in disaster events from 1950 to 2005, focusing on floods, storms, and earthquakes. The text emphasizes that while certain disasters have increased in frequency, others remain stable. A key concept discussed is 'exposure', which refers to the presence of people and infrastructure in hazard-prone areas. The section argues that the degree of concern for a disaster largely depends on human presence; for instance, landslides in populated areas draw more attention than those in uninhabited regions. The text also contemplates the parameters of exposure, including population density, the types of buildings, and the activities conducted in these areas. Understanding disaster risk management requires not only quantifying exposure but also assessing the vulnerability of those populations, which informs disaster preparedness strategies.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, also here is another chart you can see from 1950 to 2005, the number of events that flood is increasing, storm also are increasing, earthquake is almost the same as from 1950’s to 2005, you cannot see much huge differences but other disasters you can see they are increasing very prominently.
This chunk describes a historical overview of disaster events from 1950 to 2005. It emphasizes that while certain disasters like earthquakes have remained relatively constant, other disasters such as floods and storms have increased significantly. The increase in these events highlights the growing threat of climate-related disasters.
Imagine watching a movie where natural disasters are the antagonists. In the earlier parts of the movie (1950s), the problem (disasters) was manageable. However, as the movie progresses, you see more frequent disasters occurring — like a character who transforms from a minor issue to a major threat as the storyline unfolds. This mirrors how climate change might be causing an increase in disasters like floods and storms in our real lives.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, we are talking about hazards that this landslide or this stone when it is exposed to heavy rainfall or earthquake, it can have some potentiality to cause human injury or loss or property damage. It may cause, not necessarily that it will cause.
This section introduces the concept of a hazard. It begins with an example of a landslide triggered by heavy rainfall or an earthquake, illustrating its potential to cause harm. It clarifies that just because a hazard exists doesn't mean it will always lead to a disaster. The focus is on the potential effects that hazards can have.
Think of a hazard like a loaded gun. It has the potential to cause harm, but it does not automatically do so unless someone pulls the trigger. Similarly, a landslide or flood is a hazard that can result in injury or damage, but it will only have real consequences if it affects people or property in its path.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now, as I said that we have avalanches and we have landslides in Himalayas, we do not care why we do not care, if there is an avalanche, if there landslides in Himalaya.
This chunk highlights differing levels of concern regarding disasters based on their location. It points out that while people may not react to landslides or avalanches in remote areas like the Himalayas, they are significantly more concerned about landslides or earthquakes in populated urban areas. This reflects how human proximity to hazards influences responses to disasters.
Imagine a wildfire raging in a remote forest far away from human settlements. People may not be alarmed because it poses no threat to their safety. However, if that same wildfire starts approaching a nearby town, the urgency and concern levels drastically change, illustrating how distance and location impact concern about hazards.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, the presence of this person is very important. So, it is not only this person but if we have more settlements, more houses, more people we care more right, maybe here you look, we care more and more because the simple reason is that more and more people and settlements, houses, buildings are there. So, this one we are calling as exposure; the situation of people, infrastructure, housing, production capacities and other tangible human assets located in hazard-prone areas.
This section introduces the concept of 'exposure,' which refers to the presence of people and their properties in areas prone to hazards. It asserts that the more people, infrastructure, and settlements that exist in a hazard-prone area, the greater the concern for potential disaster. Therefore, exposure is determined by the number of assets and people at risk.
Consider the difference between a small village and a bustling city. If a typhoon threatens a small village with few homes, the impact may be less severe compared to a large city with densely packed homes and businesses. A city is more 'exposed' to the risks of the typhoon because it has more people and structures that could be harmed.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Another one is the quantity; how many people or structure or buildings are exposed to the hazard, another one is the amount and type of activities they support.
This chunk examines the factors that define exposure, including the number of structures and people at risk, as well as the types of activities occurring in those areas. It argues that the nature of these activities (agricultural, industrial, etc.) affects how exposure is assessed and understood.
Picture two neighborhoods: one is filled with factories (industrial activities) while the other is primarily residential. A chemical spill in the industrial area might endanger workers and cause different risks compared to damage in the residential area. Thus, the type and amount of activities in each neighborhood shape how vulnerable each area is to disasters.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
It also matter that if this hazard would take place at day time, when people are not working, people are working outside, people are not at their home. Or maybe night time when people are sleeping...
This section discusses how the timing of a disaster, whether during the day or night, affects exposure. It points out that at night, more individuals are likely to be at home and potentially more exposed to hazards. This factor further influences how hazardous a situation can become, based on the number of people present at the time.
Think of a concert crowd. During the day, a few people might be out buying snacks or walking around, so exposure to hazards (e.g., an emergency situation) is lower. However, if the same crowd is packed tightly together during a concert at night, a fire or exit blockage would impact more people, highlighting increased risk due to timing.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, when we are talking about hazard and exposure so, if we say that okay, this much of people are exposed to this disaster, is it enough to define a disaster?
This chunk questions whether the mere count of exposed individuals is sufficient to define the risk of a disaster. It emphasizes that not just the number of people, but also their characteristics (age, socio-economic status, etc.) matters in assessing risk. Vulnerable populations require deeper consideration when evaluating exposure to potential hazards.
Imagine two different towns facing a flood threat: one has a young, working population, while the other comprises mostly elderly individuals. The same flood may pose a greater risk to the elderly town, illustrating that understanding the characteristics of the population is essential when planning for disaster preparedness.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Disaster Risk: Refers to potential losses from hazards based on exposure and vulnerability.
Exposure: The amount of people or assets vulnerable to natural disasters within a specific area.
Vulnerability: The extent to which a population can be harmed by exposure to hazards.
Hazard: Any event or condition that poses a threat to safety or well-being.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
A landslide in a densely populated urban area poses a higher risk than one in an uninhabited forest.
Communities with high proportions of elderly or low-income residents are more vulnerable during natural disasters due to limited resources.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
When disasters strike, don’t be caught out, it’s all about exposure, no need to doubt.
Imagine a city full of tall buildings. The closer the people are to the danger, the more they need to prepare for potential disasters.
E - Everyone, X - eXposed, P - Populace, O - Occupied; Remember that exposure is the key to disaster risks!
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Disaster Risk
Definition:
The potential for losses due to natural or man-made hazards impacting vulnerable populations and infrastructure.
Term: Exposure
Definition:
The presence of people, property, and infrastructure in hazard-prone areas that can be affected by disasters.
Term: Vulnerability
Definition:
The susceptibility of a population or structure to suffer harm from exposure to hazards.
Term: Hazard
Definition:
A potential source of harm or adverse effect on a person or property.