1.1. Stakeholders and Partnerships

Here is the level of people different kinds of stakeholders starting from our GCOE that is global centre of excellence, human security engineering of Kyoto university team and Local community members and municipal corporations Greater Mumbai especially the involvement of the G-North wards.

This chunk introduces the different stakeholders involved in the project, focusing on the Global Centre of Excellence (GCOE) in human security engineering as well as the local community members and municipal corporations. The GCOE is likely a specialized team from Kyoto University tasked with researching and developing effective human security measures. Local community members play a crucial role in the process by providing insights and information relevant to the mapping project. Furthermore, municipal corporations such as those in Greater Mumbai, particularly G-North wards, are key partners, offering logistical support and engaging with the community.

Imagine a community garden project where local residents, experts from a gardening university, and city officials all work together. The university students contribute knowledge and skills, while the local residents share their practical experiences and needs, and city officials help with permits and resources. Each group has a vital role, just like the stakeholders in the mapping project.

Local community was the key Informant one of the main actors in this process and MCGM or Municipal Corporations also helped us providing logistics support, helping in building rapport with the people.

In this chunk, we learn that the local community served as a key informant in the mapping process, meaning their input was essential for gathering accurate and relevant information. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) played a supportive role, helping to provide logistics and facilitating relationships within the community. Building rapport is vital because it fosters trust and open communication, allowing for a more effective collaboration between stakeholders.

Think about a neighborhood watch program where local residents know their community best. They inform the police about potential safety concerns while the police provide resources and advice. By working together and establishing trust, they make the community safer for everyone.

We collected a lot of data there starting from land-use data, residential, commercial, public, playground, infrastructure what are the infrastructures are there, Doctors clinic, community toilet, community taps, school.

This chunk details the types of data that were collected during the mapping project. The team gathered comprehensive land-use data that includes categorizing areas as residential, commercial, and public spaces. Additionally, the mapping involved identifying critical infrastructure such as clinics, community toilets, water taps, and schools. This granular information helps in understanding the existing resources available to the community.

Think of a school project where you're tasked with showcasing your neighborhood. You would walk around to note various features, such as parks, schools, and shops. By documenting these elements, you create a picture of the community's layout and resources, just as the team mapped out the area's land use.

Hazard parameters we considered, flood duration, water level during the flood, areas frequently affected, building height, building materials, building conditions, plinth level these all we collected.

In this section, the focus is on the hazard parameters taken into account during the mapping effort. These include factors like how long floods last, the water levels reached, the areas that get inundated frequently, and characteristics of buildings such as their height and material. Understanding these parameters helps identify risks and vulnerabilities within the community. By knowing which areas are most affected, better planning and prevention strategies can be developed.

Imagine a health survey in a school where students identify common illnesses and their severity. By gathering information on how long students are sick, the symptoms they experience, and their living conditions, school authorities can take appropriate steps to improve health services. Similarly, understanding flood parameters prepares the community for better disaster management.

In 2006 after 2006 lot of residential areas this is actually a road this is one of the fraction of the Rajiv Gandhi Nagar, many are transferred into commercial areas.

This chunk highlights urban development changes observed in Rajiv Gandhi Nagar post-2006. Many residential neighborhoods have transitioned into commercial areas, indicating significant shifts in land use. This transformation affects the community's dynamics and can impact infrastructure and services required by the residents who remain.

Imagine a quaint village that has seen a boom in tourism. Charming homes are converted into shops and restaurants to cater to visitors. While this may boost the local economy, it can also change the village's character and impact the lives of long-term residents who may feel overwhelmed by the changes.

People could not evacuate during 2005 one reason that there was no designated place there was no early warning and the head of the household was not at house.

This part discusses the challenges the community faced during a flood event in 2005, which led to inadequate evacuations. Key problems included the lack of designated evacuation sites, absence of timely warnings, and the head of households being away. These circumstances left families confused about where to go and hindered their ability to respond effectively during emergencies.

Consider a school fire drill where students are unaware of the exits. If the teachers haven't communicated which way to go or if one of the responsible staff members is absent, chaos may ensue. Similarly, a lack of preparation and communication during a flood can lead to disarray and potential harm.

--