Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Today, we're discussing the monumental impact of the Alto Mayo earthquakes in 1990 and 1991. Can anyone tell me what an earthquake is?
It's when there are sudden shakes of the ground because of shifting tectonic plates.
Exactly! These earthquakes measured 6.2 on the Richter scale, resulting in tremendous destruction. How many homes were impacted?
Around 6,000 homes were damaged or destroyed.
Correct. This event led to the tragic loss of approximately 70 lives. Let's remember this with the acronym **DIE**: Damage, Injuries, and Economic loss.
Now, how should communities approach recovery after such disasters? What did Practical Action focus on?
They emphasized long-term reconstruction rather than just short-term relief.
Exactly! This approach is part of the 'Build Back Better' initiative. How can rebuilding be better than before?
By incorporating earthquake-resistant materials and techniques!
Right! They moved away from adobe and rammed earth. Let's use the mnemonic **RISE**: Rebuild with Innovative Shelter Engineering for impact.
Let's dive into the quincha construction technique that replaced traditional methods. Does anyone know what materials are used in quincha?
Timber frames and woven cane!
Perfect! This method improves resilience and lowers repair costs significantly. Remember the phrase **LOWER**: Low-cost Options with Effective Resilience.
Why was it chosen over adobe?
Because quincha provides better earthquake resistance and uses local resources, fostering community involvement.
Finally, let’s discuss the broader impacts of these recovery efforts. How did the economy change post-recovery?
There was a rise in community participation and housing stability.
Excellent! By 1994, about 558 improved quincha houses were built. This sparked widespread community involvement, which can be summed up as **GROW**: Greater Resilience, Opportunities, and Well-being.
So, the techniques not only helped rebuild but also empowered the community?
Exactly! Empowerment through participation is key for sustainable recovery.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The 1990 Alto Mayo earthquakes significantly affected the region, resulting in loss of life and destruction of homes. Through the work of various organizations, a recovery model was implemented that favored quincha construction techniques over traditional adobe, which improved resilience and affordability. The outcomes showed a surge in community participation and a noteworthy rise in housing stability in the region.
The Alto Mayo region experienced significant devastation from earthquakes on May 29, 1990, and again in 1991, both registering at 6.2 on the Richter scale. The first earthquake resulted in approximately 70 fatalities, 1600 injuries, and damaged or destroyed about 6,000 homes. Following these disasters, recovery efforts spearheaded by Practical Action focused on long-term reconstruction rather than short-term relief.
An essential part of the recovery involved the reevaluation of construction techniques. Traditional methods, such as rammed earth and adobe, were deemed less viable due to their vulnerability to earthquakes. Instead, quincha construction, a technique utilizing timber frames and woven cane, was promoted due to its improved earthquake resistance and local material availability. This method not only reduced costs significantly (about $1,300 for a 30 square meter house compared to $5,400 for brick structures) but also facilitated community participation, with local residents getting trained in construction methods.
Key modifications included the integration of concrete foundations, which strengthened the structure, and lightweight roofing materials, reducing hazards from falling debris during seismic events. The outcome of these initiatives not only led to an increase in earthquake-resistant homes in Alto Mayo but also inspired a cultural shift towards sustainable building practices and reinforced local capacities.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
In 1990, on 29th May, Alto Mayo was struck by an earthquake measuring 6.2 on the Richter scale, resulting in the death of about 70 people, injuring 1600, and causing damage or destruction to almost 6,000 homes. Later, in 1991, another earthquake of 6.2 magnitude occurred, leading to 40 deaths, 700 injuries, and destruction of 466 homes in Moyobamba and 339 in Rioja.
The Alto Mayo region in Peru experienced two significant earthquakes in 1990 and 1991, both measuring 6.2 on the Richter scale. The first earthquake caused substantial loss of life and considerable damage to homes. This led to a humanitarian crisis, as many families lost their shelters. The second earthquake, occurring just a year later, compounded the destruction, further straining recovery efforts in the region.
Think of Alto Mayo as a small community that just rebuilt after a storm, only to face another one shortly after. Just like how a second storm would destroy the homes built after the first, the second earthquake hindered recovery efforts and put families back at square one.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
The recovery process in Alto Mayo was largely guided by the Practical Action Group, which focused on long-term reconstruction rather than short-term relief efforts. They conducted surveys and engaged local leaders to assess the needs of the community, identifying beneficiaries based on these assessments.
The Practical Action Group played a crucial role in the recovery efforts after the earthquakes. Rather than just providing immediate relief, they took a more sustainable approach by focusing on the long-term rebuilding of homes and infrastructure. They conducted surveys to gather information about the community's needs and worked closely with local leaders to ensure that they were meeting the right priorities of those affected by the earthquakes.
Imagine a teacher assessing her students to understand their learning needs rather than just giving them a one-time review session. The teacher might ask each student what they struggle with and tailor her lessons accordingly, similar to how the Practical Action Group tailored their recovery strategies based on community input.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
In consultation with local leaders, the group decided to move away from traditional rammed earth and adobe construction techniques, opting to promote quincha, a reinforced timber-frame construction. This method employed timber posts and bamboo woven infill for enhanced earthquake resistance.
Due to the increased risk of earthquakes, the Practical Action Group recognized that traditional building methods might not withstand future quakes. As a solution, they introduced quincha, which is a stronger and more resilient building technique. By using timber frames and bamboo, structures became lighter and better at resisting movement during an earthquake. This technical shift represented an essential evolution in how communities could safely rebuild.
It's like switching from older, less durable materials in an art project to using sturdier options like acrylics instead of watercolor paints. The sturdier materials can withstand more, allowing for better results and longevity, similar to how quincha provides better protection against earthquakes.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
By 1994, 558 improved quincha houses were built in the Alto Mayo province. The census data revealed that quincha constituted 30% of the housing stock in the project area, significantly more than the 7% national average in 1993. The cost of constructing a quincha house was about $1300, in stark contrast to $5400 for a brick house. This approach benefited the local community by providing affordable housing using accessible materials.
The introduction of improved quincha housing had a profound impact on the Alto Mayo community. By 1994, there was a significant increase in the number of quincha houses, indicating the community's acceptance and successful adaptation of this new technique. The cost savings were also substantial, making these houses affordable for families who previously could not afford traditional brick construction. This shift not only provided shelter but also stimulated local economies by using locally sourced materials and labor.
Consider a community that discovers a new fruit that grows abundantly nearby but is far cheaper and healthier than what they’ve had before. As more people start to eat this new fruit, not only do they save money, but they also improve their health and support local farmers. This is similar to how quincha housing improved living conditions and boosted the local economy.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Eighteen years after the earthquakes, changes in agriculture and population migration became evident. Droughts in North Peru affected crops, leading people to migrate to Alto Mayo, where land was available. The government also encouraged increased agricultural production in the region, expanding cultivated areas significantly.
Long after the reconstruction, the impacts of the earthquakes continued to shape the region. The conditions in North Peru made it challenging for farmers, leading them to seek opportunities in Alto Mayo. The government's proactive approach in encouraging agricultural efforts helped to expand the area under cultivation, which not only supported those migrants but also helped stabilize the local economy. This reflects the interconnected nature of environmental conditions and social changes over time.
Think of a river drying up due to climate change, forcing fishers to find new water bodies to work in. Similarly, the droughts forced farmers to seek new lands where agriculture was still viable. As more fishers move to the new water body, it begins to thrive with life, just as the Alto Mayo region prospered as more farmers settled there.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Earthquake Impact: Understanding the immediate effects of seismic events.
Building Techniques: The importance of choosing appropriate construction methods in disaster recovery.
Community Involvement: The role of local participation in rebuilding processes.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
The use of quincha construction technique improved earthquake resistance in affected areas, leading to safer homes.
Community engagement in recovery efforts resulted in a faster rebuilding process and expanded local skill sets.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
In Alto Mayo, quakes did shake, but with quincha, they’ll rebuild, no mistake!
Once upon a time, in the shaking lands of Alto Mayo, a wise builder taught the townsfolk to weave their homes with strength using timber and cane. After the quake, they stood tall, thanks to their collective effort.
Remember 'RISE': Rebuild with Innovative Shelter Engineering for impact.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Alto Mayo
Definition:
A region in Peru significantly impacted by earthquakes in 1990 and 1991.
Term: Quincha
Definition:
A construction technique using timber frames and woven cane, providing improved earthquake resistance.
Term: Build Back Better
Definition:
An approach focusing on long-term recovery and resilience in the aftermath of disasters.
Term: Rammed Earth
Definition:
A traditional building method using natural raw materials, which was less effective in earthquake-prone areas.