Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Good morning, class! Today, we're going to discuss how the messages we receive about risks can shape our perceptions. Can anyone tell me what influences you to believe something is risky?
I think if I hear a lot about casualties, I tend to believe it's more dangerous.
Exactly! The more casualties, the more likely we believe the risk is significant. This ties into the concept of *availability*. Things that are more readily available in our minds, like recent news, tend to seem more dangerous. Can anyone give me an example?
Like how we see news about earthquakes more than floods, even if floods happen more often?
Precisely! That illustrates how media coverage can skew our perception of what's risky. Remember, just because we don't hear about it often doesn't mean it's not a risk. Great insights so far!
Let's move on to the idea of catastrophic potentials. How do you think people assess the risks between something like drought and a major earthquake?
I think people see earthquakes as scarier because they're rare and deadly.
Exactly! Rare events with severe consequences—like the Japan earthquake—are often considered riskier than frequent, less damaging events. Does that make sense?
So, even if droughts happen every year, since they're less dramatic, people don't see them as a big deal?
That's correct! Our perception of risk can be very context-dependent. Don't forget, *dread* is a significant factor here. Rare but deadly events invoke a greater emotional response.
Now, let's discuss personal control. How does believing you can control a risk affect your perception of that risk?
If I think I can handle it, I probably consider it less risky?
Right! When individuals feel they can manage a risk, it feels less threatening. Does anyone recall a personal experience where they felt in control?
Once I had to deal with flooding after heavy rain, but since I had sandbags, I felt okay.
Absolutely! That sense of control can diminish your perception of risk. Always remember, familiarity also plays a key role in how we assess risk.
Finally, let's touch on the media's influence. Why do you think some disasters receive more media coverage than others?
I guess because they have more people affected or there's a lot of drama involved?
Exactly! Media is drawn to serious, unusual events. What do you think this means for our understanding of risks?
It probably means we focus more on those dramatic events, even if they're not that common.
You've got it! This is an important concept as it can lead to misleading perceptions of risk. To summarize today, we discussed how messages, control, and media shape our view of risks!
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The section discusses various dimensions affecting risk perception, including the catastrophic potential of events, the role of personal control, and how media can shape public opinion. It explains that high probability events with low consequences, like drought, might be perceived as less risky compared to rare catastrophic events, such as earthquakes.
In understanding risk, individual perception plays a crucial role. This section highlights how people assess risks based on both the likelihood of an event and its potential impact. Key points include:
This section underscores that understanding risk goes beyond statistics; it is intricately tied to human perception, context, and media influence.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
But when we are saying that, that much of casualty happened people are more likely to believe the information, ready to accept that this is risky. Importance of message is also very important, okay. Who is sending these informations to them and how important it is?
This chunk discusses how the perception of risk is influenced by the news of casualties. When people hear about significant numbers of casualties from an event, they are more inclined to trust the information and view that event as dangerous. It also emphasizes that the source of this information matters significantly. If the message comes from a credible or significant source, individuals are more likely to regard the information as valid and concerning.
For instance, if a well-respected health organization reports a sudden spike in illnesses due to a flu outbreak, people are likely to take precautions. However, if the same information comes from an unknown or untrustworthy source, individuals may not be as inclined to believe or act on it.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Another one the catastrophic potentials, how people consider the catastrophic potentials in order to judge the risk. When we are saying high probability, low consequence of disasters like you can say the drought compared to low probability high consequences like the 2011 Japan earthquake and Tsunami. Which one you think people considered more risky, accept as risk.
This chunk explores how individuals evaluate risks based on the likelihood of occurrence and the severity of potential consequences. It contrasts disasters that are likely to happen but have relatively low consequences, such as droughts, with those that are less likely but could result in catastrophic outcomes, like the Japan earthquake and tsunami. Generally, people tend to perceive low-probability, high-consequence events as riskier than high-probability, low-consequence events, demonstrating a tendency to fear the unexpected or extreme outcomes.
For example, many might view a rare but devastating hurricane that hits once every century as more terrifying than the frequent occurrence of minor floods that happen every year, even though the cumulative impact of these floods might be more frequent.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Also, the context, the risk situation, the perception of dread having personal control, that I can control the risk over the magnitude and probability, so how it will happen or what extended to happen, I have some control or not. This is one variable, another variable is the familiarity, if I have experienced that one or if I am experiencing that.
This chunk addresses two key factors in risk perception: personal control and familiarity. People often feel less threatened by risks when they believe they have some control over the situation. For example, someone who can take preventative measures feels less at risk compared to someone who feels helpless. Familiarity also plays a role; individuals who regularly encounter certain risks may become desensitized to them, leading to a perception of reduced risk.
Consider a firefighter who regularly deals with fires. They may perceive their risk of harm during a fire as lower than someone who has never encountered one, due to their familiarity and training in handling such situations.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, this kind of questions like you were running a nuclear power plant but that may cause you were running from that but that may cause someone’s, increase someone’s risk. So, which one people will believe? So, also the potential to blame someone that this risk is happening, this flood is happening because of the municipal authority.
This chunk highlights how the attribution of responsibility affects risk perception. When disasters occur, people often seek to identify who is to blame. If there is a clear party that can be held accountable, such as a government authority, individuals may perceive that risk as greater. The feeling that unfairness is present, such as when certain groups disproportionately benefit while others suffer, can amplify the perception of risk, leading to stronger emotional responses.
For instance, following a major oil spill, communities might feel anger and perceive the risk of environmental disasters as much higher when they can blame the oil company for negligence, even if the company is a significant contributor to employment and local economy.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Okay, alike availability, events that come to people’s mind immediately they can imagine it okay, high and less mentally available or representativeness, singular events that they experience not exactly the same.
This chunk discusses the concept of mental availability in evaluating risks. It suggests that people tend to assess risks based on how easily they can recall similar past events. If a disaster is vivid in their memory, it increases the perceived risk associated with it. The chunk highlights how unique, memorable experiences can skew perception and make certain risks seem more prominent than they might statistically be.
For example, if an individual has recently seen extensive news coverage of a plane crash, they may suddenly perceive airplane travel as more dangerous, despite it statistically being one of the safest modes of transport, simply because that vivid image is fresh in their memory.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now, the transmitter of risk information, that how the sender is that the transmitter is collecting the informations from the senders and the perceived seriousness of the risk okay.
This chunk explains how mass media serves as a key player in communicating risk information. The media collects and interprets data from various sources, such as scientists, government reports, and eyewitness accounts, before disseminating that information to the public. The way media interprets this information can significantly affect public perception and understanding of the risks involved.
For instance, during a health crisis like a pandemic, how the media reports on the virus—highlighting either the number of cases or the death toll—greatly influences public response and panic levels. Positive or negative framing by the media can lead to vastly different public reactions.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, factors that determine transmitter attractiveness to pass report risk informations or risk news is, if it is technologically induced hazard then compared to natural hazards they will report more possibility to blame someone.
This chunk discusses the criteria that make certain risk stories more appealing to mass media. Events deemed to have a technological origin, like industrial accidents, are often prioritized because they allow for clear attribution of blame. Additionally, factors like cultural distance from the event, uniqueness of the story, and current political relevance also influence media coverage.
For example, a factory explosion in a small town may receive more media coverage than a widespread agricultural drought due to the immediate human impact and the potential for accountability—therefore, it resonates more with the audience.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Risk Perception: The subjective judgement people make about risks, influenced by various factors.
Catastrophic Potential: Assessment of risks based on their likelihood and potential impact.
Familiarity: Regular exposure to certain risks can lead to desensitization and altered perceptions.
Media Influence: The role of media in shaping public views of risk could lead to misapprehension.
Dread: Emotional factors can amplify perceptions of danger, particularly for rare but severe events.
Personal Control: Individuals' beliefs in their capacity to manage risks significantly shape their sense of security.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
Many individuals view the risk of a plane crash as higher than that of car accidents, despite statistical evidence indicating that driving is more dangerous due to the rarity of plane crashes in media coverage.
Public reactions to disasters, like hurricanes or earthquakes, often emphasize immediate fatalities, but underlying risks like droughts that occur annually receive less media attention.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
If it's rare yet dire, our fears will conspire; media will fire, our risks will acquire.
Imagine living in a town where droughts are common but forgotten. One day, an earthquake hits, and suddenly everyone rushes to prepare, fueled by media coverage that overstates its frequency. They realize the real risk was always the drought.
R.E.A.C.T.: Risk, Emotions, Accountability, Control, Transmitters. Remember these when assessing risks!
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Risk Perception
Definition:
The subjective judgement people make about the characteristics and severity of a risk.
Term: Catastrophic Potential
Definition:
The potential for an event to cause significant loss or damage, often assessed based on its likelihood and severity.
Term: Familiarity
Definition:
The degree to which individuals have prior experiences or knowledge about a risk.
Term: Media Influence
Definition:
The effect that mass media can have on public perception and understanding of risks.
Term: Dread
Definition:
An intense fear or anxiety associated with a risk, typically more prominent in low probability/high consequence events.
Term: Personal Control
Definition:
The belief that individuals can influence or manage a risk effectively.
Term: Transmitter of Risk Information
Definition:
Entities such as media or public institutions that convey information about risks to the general public.