Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Today, we will explore the concept of equivalence relations. An equivalence relation over a set A must satisfy three properties: reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity. Can anyone explain what reflexivity means in this context?
I think reflexivity means that any element is related to itself, like saying a is related to a.
Exactly! Great job! Now, can someone explain symmetry?
I believe it means if a is related to b, then b must also be related to a.
Correct! Finally, what about transitivity?
If a is related to b and b is related to c, then a should be related to c.
Perfect, you've got it! So remember the acronym RST: Reflexive, Symmetric, Transitive to help remember these properties. Let's move on to how we can see these in action using modulo operations.
Consider integers and the relation of congruence modulo m. For example, we say that integers a and b are related if they give the same remainder when divided by m. Can anyone provide an example?
If we take m as 3, then 6 and 9 are congruent since both give a remainder of 0 when divided by 3.
Exactly! Now, based on that, how would you show that this relation is reflexive?
Since any integer a, when divided by 3, will have the same remainder as itself.
Good insight! Next, how do we show symmetry using this relation?
If a is congruent to b, then b is also congruent to a since the condition is the same.
Correct! Lastly, what about transitivity?
If a is congruent to b and b is congruent to c, then a must be congruent to c.
Excellent! So we've established that congruence modulo m satisfies all three properties, making it an equivalence relation.
Now that we understand equivalence relations, let's delve into equivalence classes. What do we mean by the equivalence class of an element a?
I think it consists of all elements that are related to a through the equivalence relation.
Exactly! If we take an integer a, how do we formally define its equivalence class?
The equivalence class of a is denoted as [a] = {b ∈ A: (a, b) ∈ R}.
Great! And what are some properties of equivalence classes?
They are non-empty because a is always related to itself.
And two equivalence classes are either disjoint or the same.
Correct! Remember this property, as it’s crucial when working with equivalence classes. Think of them like distinct groups that don’t overlap unless they are identical.
Let’s illustrate equivalence classes using our earlier example with modulo 3. What does the equivalence class [0] look like?
[0] would include ... -6, -3, 0, 3, 6,... all multiples of 3.
Excellent! And what about [1]?
[1] will include -5, -2, 1, 4, 7,... all numbers that give a remainder of 1 when divided by 3.
Exactly! And a very important observation is what happens with classes like [0] and [3]. What can you deduce?
They are the same since both are multiples of 3.
Correct! So, equivalence classes can overlap depending on the relation defined. This leads us to understand how classes segment a set based on relations.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
In this section, we learn about equivalence relations, characterized by three key properties: reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity. The section illustrates these concepts with examples involving integers and modulo operations, particularly focusing on congruence relations and the formation of equivalence classes.
Equivalence relations are a special type of relationship in mathematics, defined over sets. An equivalence relation is characterized by three fundamental properties:
An example provided is an equivalence relation defined over integers concerning modulo m. For integers a and b, we say that a is congruent to b modulo m if they share the same remainder when divided by m. The section also introduces equivalence classes, subsets containing all elements related to a given element through the equivalence relation. The properties of equivalence classes ensure they are non-empty and either identical or disjoint.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Hello everyone, welcome to this lecture on equivalence Relations. And just to recap in the last lecture we discussed some special types of relations like Reflexive Relations, Symmetric Relations, Asymmetric relations, Anti Symmetric Relations, Transitive Relations. So, in this lecture we will introduce a special type of relation called as equivalence Relation and we will see the definition of equivalence classes.
In this introduction, the professor sets the stage for learning about equivalence relations. After discussing various types of mathematical relations in a previous lecture, we now focus on a special type of relation—equivalence relations. An equivalence relation is a way of grouping elements such that certain properties hold.
Think of equivalence relations like a club where members share common characteristics. Just as club members might both enjoy sports or music, elements in an equivalence relation share a specific property that links them together.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, what is the formal definition of an equivalence relation? It is a relation R over a set A which satisfies three properties namely the relation should be reflexive, the relation should be symmetric and the relation should be transitive. It should satisfy all these three properties. If any of these three properties is not satisfied, the relation will not be called as an equivalence Relation.
An equivalence relation is defined by three key properties: reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity. Reflexivity means every element is related to itself. Symmetry means if one element is related to another, the second is also related to the first. Transitivity means if one element relates to a second, and that second relates to a third, then the first and third must relate. If any of these properties fail to hold, the relation cannot be considered an equivalence relation.
Consider a family relationship. If you think of being a sibling as a relation, it is reflexive (a sibling is a sibling to themselves), symmetric (if A is a sibling to B, then B is a sibling to A), and transitive (if A is a sibling to B and B is a sibling to C, then A is also a sibling to C).
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, let us see an example. So, I define a relation over ℤ here and by relation here is that an integer a will be related to integer b if a ≡ b (mod m). We say an integer a and integer b are congruent, they are congruent with respect to modulo m if the remainder which I obtained by dividing a by the modulus m is exactly the same as the remainder which I obtained by dividing b by the modulus m.
The example provided uses integers and a modulus (m). Two integers a and b are considered equivalent if they give the same remainder when divided by m. This means that they are congruent under modulo m conditions. To understand this in mathematical terms, we express it as a ≡ b (mod m).
Imagine you have a clock that resets every 12 hours. If it's 10 o’clock now, in 14 hours, it will show 12 o’clock. In this example, 10 and 12 are equivalent times on a 12-hour clock, similar to how integers can be equivalent under modulo conditions.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now my claim is that this relation R is an equivalence relation. It satisfies the property of reflexive relation. So, let us prove that. So, let us check: a is congruent to a modulo m, which gives us (a - a) ≡ 0 (mod m). Thus, every integer a is always congruent to itself modulo m, fulfilling the reflexivity requirement.
In proving that our relation is reflexive, we check if an integer a is always related to itself. By the definition of equivalence relations, since (a - a) equals zero, it shows that every integer has a congruence with itself when considered under any modulus m. This confirms the reflexivity property.
Think of this as looking in a mirror. Just as your reflection shows you exactly as you are, each integer reflects back to itself in this congruence relation. You always recognize yourself!
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
The relation R is also symmetric, we can prove that. For proving the symmetric property, I assume that consider an arbitrary pair of integers (a, b) where a ≡ b (mod m) → b ≡ a (mod m). This means if a is related to b, then b must also be related to a, satisfying the symmetry condition.
To show that the relation is symmetric, we take two integers, a and b. If a is congruent to b (which means they give the same remainder when divided by m), then under the same modulus, b must also give the same remainder when divided by m with respect to a. Therefore, the symmetry condition holds.
Imagine two friends borrowing books from each other. If Alice lends a book to Bob, it’s reasonable to say that Bob can lend a book back to Alice. Their relationship (the borrowing of books) reflects this symmetry beautifully.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now let us prove that the relation R is transitive as well. So, for proving the transitivity property I have to show that if I have a related to b in my relation and b related to c in the relation, then I have to show that a is related to c. If (a - b) and (b - c) are both divisible by m, then (a - c) must also be divisible by m.
To prove transitivity, we consider three integers a, b, and c. If a is related to b (a ≡ b (mod m)), and b is related to c (b ≡ c (mod m)), then by adding these two relationships, we also find that a is related to c (a ≡ c (mod m)). This is essential to confirming that our relation qualifies as an equivalence relation.
Take a chain of friendships. If Alice is friends with Bob, and Bob is friends with Charlie, it follows that Alice and Charlie are part of the same social circle. The friendships create a chain, reflecting the transitive nature of relationships.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Imagine R is an equivalence relation over some set A. And now consider an element a ∈ A. Then the equivalence class of A which is denoted by this notation you have the square bracket and within that you have the element a. So, the equivalence class of [a] = {b:(a,b) ∈ R}, consist of all the elements from the set A which are related to this element a as per the relation R.
An equivalence class gathers all elements that share a particular relationship defined by R with a specific element a. Denoted as [a], the class includes every element related to a under the equivalence relation. This set is a collection of all elements considered equivalent to a.
Think of this as a club of people (the equivalence class) who share the same interest (the membership condition). If a is a member of a cooking club, then all the other members who love cooking too are in the equivalence class [a].
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
The first trivial thing to check here is verify here is that you take the equivalence class of any element, it will be non-empty. There will be at least one element which is always guaranteed to be present in the equivalence class of any element a. This element is the element a itself. Because the element a is always related as per the relation R due to reflexivity.
This property reaffirms that every equivalence class must contain at least the element a itself since equivalence relations are reflexive. Thus, no equivalence class will ever be empty; it will always have the representative element of the class.
In an art class, every student has a distinct style (their uniqueness), but they all belong to the same art class. Thus, no student can be part of a class without being themselves—they embody their belonging, just like the equivalence class contains its defining element.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Equivalence Relation: A relation with properties of reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity.
Reflexivity: Each element is related to itself.
Symmetry: If one element relates to another, the reverse is also true.
Transitivity: A chain of relations implies an indirect relation.
Equivalence Class: A grouping of all elements related by an equivalence relation.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
The equivalence class [0] under modulo 3 consists of integers like ..., -6, -3, 0, 3, 6, ... (multiples of 3).
The equivalence class [1] under modulo 3 consist of integers like ..., -5, -2, 1, 4, 7, ... (elements yielding remainder 1 when divided by 3).
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
In sets we conform, to rules we transform; Reflexive, symmetric, transitive, keep the norm!
Imagine a family reunion where every family member can connect with anyone else in a meaningful way. This reflects reflexive (each knows themselves), symmetric (if one knows another, the other knows back), and transitive (if one knows a friend of a friend, they’re connected too).
Remember RST for Equivalence Relations: Reflexive, Symmetric, Transitive.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Equivalence Relation
Definition:
A relation that satisfies reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity.
Term: Reflexive
Definition:
An element a is related to itself.
Term: Symmetric
Definition:
If a is related to b, then b is also related to a.
Term: Transitive
Definition:
If a is related to b and b is related to c, then a is related to c.
Term: Congruence Modulo
Definition:
A relation where two integers are related if they have the same remainder when divided by a modulus m.
Term: Equivalence Class
Definition:
The set of elements related to a given element through an equivalence relation.