Equivalence Relation
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Interactive Audio Lesson
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Understanding Equivalence Relations
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
Today we are discussing equivalence relations, which are a way to relate elements in a set based on specific properties. Can anyone tell me what it means for a relation to be reflexive?
Isn't it that each element is related to itself?
Exactly! Reflexivity means for all elements 'a', the pair (a, a) must be included in the relation. What about symmetry? Can anyone explain?
If (a, b) is in the relation, then (b, a) should also be in it.
Correct! Lastly, transitivity... Who can elaborate on that?
If (a, b) and (b, c) are in the relation, then (a, c) must also be in the relation.
Great job! So, for a relation to be classified as an equivalence relation, all three properties must hold true. Remember the acronym RST for Reflexive, Symmetric, and Transitive!
To summarize, the properties of equivalence relations are essential to understanding how elements relate within a set.
Exploring Congruence Modulo
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
Let's look at an example of an equivalence relation: congruence modulo m. Who can explain what this means?
It's when two integers leave the same remainder when divided by m, right?
Exactly! For example, if we consider m=3, what would the equivalence class of 0 look like?
It would include all multiples of 3, like 0, 3, 6, -3, and -6!
That's right. Since 0 is congruent to all these integers modulo 3, they form the equivalence class [0]. What about [1]?
[1] would include numbers like 1, 4, 7 and -2, -5, etc.
Well done! Keep in mind that equivalence classes are either disjoint or identical—the properties of partitions in mathematics.
Properties of Equivalence Classes
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
Now, let's delve deeper into equivalence classes. Can anyone tell me what it means for equivalence classes to be disjoint or the same?
That means no element can belong to two different classes at the same time.
Correct! Formally, if two equivalence classes [a] and [b] share any elements, they are simply the same class. And we can prove this. What fun fact can you remember about every equivalence class?
Every equivalence class is non-empty because it includes the element itself!
Perfect! The non-empty nature of equivalence classes helps us build a complete classification of related elements within any set A.
Recap and Application of Theorems
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
As we wrap up, can anyone recap the essential qualities that define an equivalence relation?
It's RST: Reflexive, Symmetric, and Transitive!
Exactly! And remember how equivalence classes partition the set? Why is that significant?
It helps in organizing elements into categories without overlaps.
That's correct! Understanding these concepts is crucial for more advanced topics in discrete mathematics.
To conclude, re-examine examples and theorems to reinforce this understanding!
Introduction & Overview
Read summaries of the section's main ideas at different levels of detail.
Quick Overview
Standard
Equivalence relations are characterized by three essential properties: reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity. This section also involves the concept of equivalence classes, which group elements related by equivalence relations, providing a structured way to categorize elements within a set.
Detailed
Equivalence Relation
An equivalence relation is formally defined as a relation R over a set A, which satisfies three main properties:
- Reflexive: For every element a in A, (a, a) is in R.
- Symmetric: If (a, b) is in R, then (b, a) must also be in R.
- Transitive: If (a, b) is in R and (b, c) is in R, then (a, c) is also in R.
If any of these properties is violated, the relation is not an equivalence relation.
Example of Equivalence Relation
Consider the relation defined on integers
$$ R = \{(a, b) : a \equiv b \mod m \} $$,
where two integers a and b are said to be congruent modulo m if they yield the same remainder when divided by m. It has been proved that the relation R demonstrates all three properties, hence it is indeed an equivalence relation.
Equivalence Classes
Equivalence classes are derived from equivalence relations. For any element a in a set A, its equivalence class is denoted as:
$$ [a] = \{ b \in A : (a, b) \in R \} $$.
This class contains all elements that are equivalent to a under R. Notably:
- The equivalence class is never empty, as it always includes the element a itself due to reflexivity.
- The different equivalence classes partition the original set into distinct categories, where each element from A belongs to exactly one equivalence class.
Youtube Videos
Audio Book
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Introduction to Equivalence Relations
Chapter 1 of 11
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
Hello everyone, welcome to this lecture on equivalence Relations. And just to recap in the last lecture we discussed some special types of relations like Reflexive Relations, Symmetric Relations, Asymmetric relations, Anti Symmetric Relations, Transitive Relations. So, in this lecture we will introduce a special type of relation called as equivalence Relation and we will see the definition of equivalence classes.
Detailed Explanation
In this introduction, we are setting the stage for discussing equivalence relations as a specific type of relation in mathematics. It builds on previous lectures about various relations such as reflexive, symmetric, and transitive. An equivalence relation is a combination of three key properties: reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity. This lecture will aim to define what an equivalence relation is and what equivalence classes are.
Examples & Analogies
Think of equivalence relations as a type of friendship criteria among people. If one person sees another as a friend (reflexivity), that person sees them as a friend back (symmetry), and if one person is friends with two people, then these two people are friends with each other (transitivity).
Definition of Equivalence Relation
Chapter 2 of 11
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
So, what is the formal definition of an equivalence relation? It is a relation R over a set A which satisfies three properties namely the relation should be reflexive, the relation should be symmetric and the relation should be transitive. It should satisfy all these three properties. If any of these three properties is not satisfied, the relation will not be called as an equivalence Relation.
Detailed Explanation
An equivalence relation is defined strictly by three properties. For a relation R on a set A to be classified as an equivalence relation, it must satisfy the following: 1) Reflexive: for every element a in A, a is related to itself. 2) Symmetric: if a is related to b, then b must also be related to a. 3) Transitive: if a is related to b and b is related to c, then a must also be related to c. If any of these properties fail, then R cannot be considered an equivalence relation.
Examples & Analogies
Imagine a group of friends. If you consider friendships as a relation, each person (friend) must be friends with themselves (reflexive), if you're friends with someone they should also be friends with you (symmetric), and if you're friends with two people, those two friends should know each other as well (transitive). If any of these conditions don't hold, it's not a true friendship group.
Example of Equivalence Relation with Integers
Chapter 3 of 11
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
So, let us see an example. So, I define a relation over ℤ here and by relation here is that an integer a will be related to integer b if a ≡ b (mod m). We say an integer a and integer b are congruent, they are congruent with respect to modulo m if the remainder which I obtained by dividing a by the modulus m is exactly the same as the remainder which I obtained by dividing b by the modulus m.
Detailed Explanation
This example introduces the concept of congruence in integers as an equivalence relation. Here, two integers a and b are considered equivalent (or congruent modulo m) if they leave the same remainder when divided by m. For example, if m = 3, then 6 and 9 are congruent because both leave a remainder of 0 when divided by 3. This congruence relation is a fundamental equivalence relation in number theory.
Examples & Analogies
Think of a clock: All times that are exactly 3 hours apart (like 1:00 PM and 4:00 PM) can be seen as equal or the same (congruent) because they can be represented on the same 12-hour cycle. So, measuring time in hours mirrors the concept of equivalences in integers.
Proving Reflexivity
Chapter 4 of 11
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
So, let us prove that so is the relation R reflexive? Answer is yes. Because, (a - a) ≡ 0 (mod m). You divide a whatever remainder you obtain by dividing a by m the same remainder you obtained by dividing a again by m. So, in that sense a is always congruent to a modulo m.
Detailed Explanation
To show that the relation R is reflexive, we demonstrate that every integer a is congruent to itself. When we look at the expression (a - a), it equals 0, which is divisible by any integer m. Hence, by definition, a is congruent to a under modulo m, satisfying the reflexivity condition of equivalence relations.
Examples & Analogies
Imagine a school where every student has their student ID number. Reflexivity means that every student is always equal to themselves. Just like every student verifies their own ID number against the school's record; it's always a match.
Proving Symmetry
Chapter 5 of 11
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
The relation R is also symmetric, we can prove that. For proving the symmetric property, I assume that consider an arbitrary pair of integers (a, b) where a ≡ b (mod m) → b ≡ a (mod m).
Detailed Explanation
To prove the symmetry of the relation R, we assume that a is related to b (a ≡ b mod m). According to this property, if (a - b) is divisible by m, then, naturally, (b - a) must also be divisible by m. Therefore, if a is related to b, then b must also be related back to a, validating the symmetric property.
Examples & Analogies
Consider a friendship where if person A says they are friends with person B, then person B also states they are friends with person A. The relations are bidirectional, just like symmetry in equivalence relations.
Proving Transitivity
Chapter 6 of 11
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
Now let us prove that the relation R is transitive as well. So, for proving the transitivity property I have to show that, if I have a related to b in my relation and b related to c in the relation, then I have to show that the integer a is related to integer c.
Detailed Explanation
Transitivity means that if a is congruent to b and b is congruent to c, then a must be congruent to c. This can be proven mathematically by starting from the assumptions of congruencies and showing that adding/subtracting them leads to another congruency, completing the transitive link.
Examples & Analogies
Let's say a is a friend of b, and b is a friend of c. By the principle of transitivity, a is also a friend of c. In various relationships, if you connect through someone, it holds true that you share that relationship indirectly.
Defining Equivalence Classes
Chapter 7 of 11
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
Now my claim is that this relation R is an equivalence relation. It satisfies the property of reflexive relation, symmetric relation and transitive relation. So, now let us define equivalence classes.
Detailed Explanation
Equivalence classes partition the set based on the equivalence relation. Given an equivalence relation R on a set A, the equivalence class of an element a is the set of all elements in A that are related to a by R. This forms subsets where each subset contains elements that are equivalent to one another.
Examples & Analogies
Think of equivalence classes as different categories of books in a library. All books on a similar subject (like science fiction) are grouped together. Each category represents an equivalence class where the books within are equivalent in themes or genres.
Properties of Equivalence Classes
Chapter 8 of 11
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
The first trivial thing to check here is verify here is that you take the equivalence class of any element, it will be non- empty. There will be at least one element which is always guaranteed to be present in the equivalence class of any element a...
Detailed Explanation
It is important to note that equivalence classes are never empty. By definition, each equivalence class for an element a will always contain a itself since a is reflexively related to itself. This property ensures that every equivalence class has at least one member.
Examples & Analogies
Returning to our library analogy, every category of books must contain at least one book. You can never have an empty shelf in a library category because there must always be at least one book that matches that genre precisely.
Examples of Equivalence Classes with Integers
Chapter 9 of 11
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
Let me demonstrate what exactly equivalence class looks like with an example. So, I consider this relation R over set of integers ℤ where an integer is related to integer b if a ≡ b (mod 3).
Detailed Explanation
This example demonstrates specific equivalence classes for integers under the modulo 3 relation. The equivalence class of an integer contains all integers congruent to it modulo 3, forming distinct groups of classes such as [0], [1], and [2], where each integer is grouped based on its value when divided by 3.
Examples & Analogies
Imagine classifying fruits into categories based on their color. All red fruits (like strawberries and apples) form one equivalence class; all yellow fruits (like bananas) form another. Each fruit belongs to one class based on their color, similar to how integers are grouped by their remainders.
Disjoint or Same Equivalence Classes
Chapter 10 of 11
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
So, what we are observing here is that even though we have equivalence class of every integer possible here. So, these are the various equivalence classes. And this is an infinite list. It turns out that if we closely look here we find that the two equivalence classes in this sequence are either same or they are completely disjoint.
Detailed Explanation
Here, we have established that equivalence classes are mutually exclusive, meaning two classes cannot intersect unless they are identical. For example, the equivalence classes [0] and [1] do not share any elements. This property of disjoint or identical classes is crucial in understanding how equivalence relations structure sets.
Examples & Analogies
Imagine two different clubs that are either the same (like a book club that also has cooking activities) or completely separate (like a book club and a swimming club). There can't be a member who belongs to both clubs unless the clubs are the same.
Conclusion and Recap
Chapter 11 of 11
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
That brings me to the end of this lecture. Just to recap, in this lecture we introduced the notion of equivalence relation and we also introduced the notion of equivalence classes.
Detailed Explanation
In conclusion, we have delved into equivalence relations, defining their properties, providing examples, and discussing the consequential equivalence classes formed by these relations. This foundation allows for a deeper understanding of more complex mathematical structures.
Examples & Analogies
Just like how in life we categorize relationships based on similarity, the concept of equivalence relations helps us define mathematical relationships in a structured way. It lays the groundwork for understanding larger concepts such as group theory in mathematics.
Key Concepts
-
Equivalence Relation: A relation that is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive.
-
Equivalence Class: The set of elements related to a specific element, forming categories of equivalently related items.
-
Reflexivity: Each element is related to itself.
-
Symmetry: The relationship holds in both directions.
-
Transitivity: The relations extend through a chain of related elements.
Examples & Applications
If we define the relation of equality on the set of real numbers, it's an equivalence relation because it is reflexive (a = a), symmetric (if a = b, then b = a), and transitive (if a = b and b = c, then a = c).
In modular arithmetic, the relation 'congruence modulo 3' (a ≡ b (mod 3)) is an equivalence relation since it satisfies reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity properties.
Memory Aids
Interactive tools to help you remember key concepts
Rhymes
If you want relations to be fair, they need to show some care; be reflexive and symmetric in the pair, transitive to be truly rare.
Stories
Imagine a magical land where all inhabitants agree to only relate to those who share a favorite color, just like the equivalence classes that group them based on this shared trait.
Memory Tools
Remember RST: Reflexive, Symmetric, Transitive, to identify equivalence relations with glee.
Acronyms
Use RST to recall
**R**eflexive
**S**ymmetric
**T**ransitive for equivalence relations.
Flash Cards
Glossary
- Equivalence Relation
A relation that is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive.
- Equivalence Class
The set of elements related to a given element under an equivalence relation.
- Reflexive
A property of a relation where every element is related to itself.
- Symmetric
A property of a relation where if one element is related to another, then the second is related to the first.
- Transitive
A property of a relation where if one element is related to a second, and the second is related to a third, then the first is related to the third.
Reference links
Supplementary resources to enhance your learning experience.