Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Today, we are discussing equivalence relations. Can anyone tell me what you think that means?
Is it a type of relation that shows how elements relate to each other?
Great observation! An equivalence relation is indeed a special type of relation on a set that satisfies three properties: reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity. Let's explore these together!
What is reflexivity?
Reflexivity means that every element is related to itself. For example, in set A, for every element a, the relation (a, a) must hold.
Next, let's discuss symmetry. Who can define what symmetry means in terms of relations?
If a is related to b, then b must also be related to a?
Exactly right! If we have (a, b) in the relation, that means (b, a) is also in the relation. This makes the relation symmetric!
Could you give an example of that?
Certainly! If we say that 3 and 6 are congruent modulo 3, then it also holds that 6 is congruent to 3. This shows symmetry!
Now, let’s look at transitivity. If a is related to b and b is related to c, what can we conclude?
That a is also related to c?
Exactly! This essential property allows us to establish a chain of equivalence. For example, if 2 is related to 5 and 5 is related to 8, then 2 must be related to 8.
Equivalence classes group elements based on equivalence relations. Can anyone give me an example of an equivalence class?
Like the set of all integers that give the same remainder when divided by m?
Exactly! For instance, if we take modulo 3, the equivalence class of 0 would contain all integers that can be expressed as multiples of 3, such as -6, -3, 0, 3, and so on.
Are those classes overlapping?
Good question! No, equivalence classes are either disjoint or completely identical depending on the equivalence relation.
To wrap up, we've examined the properties of equivalence relations: reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity. Each condition is essential for a relation to be classified as an equivalence relation. Can anyone summarize what we've talked about?
Equivalence classes are formed based on these properties, and they help us categorize elements based on shared characteristics!
Excellent summary! Understanding these concepts is crucial as we move forward in discrete mathematics.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The concept of equivalence relations is established in this section, detailing their formal definition and specific examples using modular arithmetic. The relationship is explored through coherence in equality among integers and how equivalence classes form based on shared properties.
In this section, we delve into the concept of equivalence relations, which are special types of relations that satisfy three key properties: reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity. A relation R over a set A is called an equivalence relation if it satisfies:
The section illustrates these properties with an example using integers modulo m, explaining that two integers a and b are congruent modulo m if they leave the same remainder when divided by m. The text provides proofs for each of the three defining properties using this example.
Furthermore, the section introduces the concept of equivalence classes, which are defined for elements based on their relationships within R. These classes highlight the non-empty nature of equivalence classes, as every class contains at least one equivalent element to the one being considered. For instance, with modulus 3, the equivalence class of 0 contains integers like 0, 3, 6, etc., while other classes similarly define relationships among different integers. Ultimately, it emphasizes the key property that equivalence classes are either completely identical or completely disjoint.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, what is the formal definition of an equivalence relation? It is a relation R over a set A which satisfies three properties namely the relation should be reflexive, the relation should be symmetric and the relation should be transitive. It should satisfy all these three properties. If any of these three properties is not satisfied, the relation will not be called as an equivalence Relation.
An equivalence relation is defined based on three key properties: reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity. Reflexivity means that every element relates to itself. Symmetry means if one element is related to another, then the second is related to the first. Transitivity means if one element is related to a second, and that second to a third, then the first is also related to the third. These properties must all hold for a relation to be considered an equivalence relation.
Imagine a classroom setting. If all students must agree on being friends (reflexive), if if student A is friends with student B, then B is friends with A (symmetric), and if student A is friends with B and B is friends with C, then A is also friends with C (transitive), then we can say that these friendships represent an equivalence relation.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, let us see an example. I define a relation over ℤ here and by relation here is that an integer a will be related to integer b if a ≡ b (mod m). We say an integer a and integer b are congruent with respect to modulo m if the remainder obtained by dividing a by m is exactly the same as the remainder obtained by dividing b by m.
This chunk describes a specific equivalence relation among integers called congruence modulo m. Two integers a and b are said to be congruent modulo m, denoted as a ≡ b (mod m), if when each integer is divided by m, they leave the same remainder. For example, if m is 3, then 4 and 7 are congruent modulo 3 because both leave a remainder of 1 when divided by 3.
Consider a clock that operates on a 12-hour cycle. If it is 3 o'clock now and after 10 hours it will be 1 o'clock, you can think of the time wrapping around like congruences in modular arithmetic. Here, 3 is equivalent to 1 mod 12, as they are in the same equivalence class.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now my claim is that this relation R is an equivalence relation. It satisfies the property of reflexive relation, Symmetric relation and transitive relation. So, let us prove that...
The lecture goes on to prove that the relation R is indeed reflexive, symmetric, and transitive. For reflexivity, for any integer a, the condition a ≡ a holds because (a - a) is 0, which is divisible by any m. For symmetry, if a ≡ b, then (b - a) must also be divisibly related to m. For transitivity, if a ≡ b and b ≡ c, then a must also be congruent to c, completing the proof that R is an equivalence relation.
Imagine a group of siblings discussing who is taller. If sibling A is taller than sibling B, and sibling B is taller than sibling C, then sibling A is taller than sibling C—a clear relationship that can extend through other siblings. This mirrors the transitive property in equivalence relations.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, now let us define equivalence classes. Imagine R is an equivalence relation over some set A. And now consider an element a ∈ A. Then the equivalence class of A which is denoted by [a] consists of all the elements from the set A which are related to this element a as per the relation R.
An equivalence class groups all elements of set A that are related to a given element a under relation R. This is denoted as [a] and includes all elements in A that have the same relationship (in this case, the same remainder when divided by m). Importantly, equivalence classes exhibit the property that they are non-empty as they always include the element a itself because of reflexivity.
Using the sibling analogy again, if setting A represents the ages of all siblings, each sibling belongs to an equivalence class determined by their relationship to others based on if they share the same birth month, reinforcing that not only are there groups based on age but they also relate through shared experiences during those months.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Let me demonstrate what exactly equivalence class looks like with an example. So, I consider this relation R over set of integers ℤ where an integer is related if a ≡ b (mod 3). So, [0] = {…,−9,−6,−3,0,3,6,9,…}, and [1] = {…,−8,−5,−2,1,4,7,10,…}.
This section uses specific integers to elucidate what equivalence classes look like in practical terms. For the relation R where congruences are modulo 3, the equivalence class of 0 includes all multiples of 3, while the equivalence class for 1 contains integers that give a remainder of 1 when divided by 3. Such classes clarify how integers can be grouped.
Think of these equivalence classes like color groups in an art class where all similar colored artworks are placed together. The artwork might all appear blue, for example, belonging to the equivalence class of 'blue artwork', as they represent a shared characteristic—just as integers grouped by their remainders do.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
it turns out that the two equivalence classes are either the same or they are completely disjoint. For instance, if I consider [0] and [1], there will be no common element between them as per the relation R.
This chunk explains a key property of equivalence classes: they do not overlap. If two equivalence classes are equal, they contain the same elements; if they are not equal, they share no elements whatsoever, which helps in visualizing and organizing sets in mathematics.
Picture clubs in a school where students can only belong to one club, like a sports club or an art club. If a student is in the sports club, they cannot be in the art club, illustrating the idea that equivalence classes (clubs) don't share members (elements).
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Equivalence Relation: Defined by reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity.
Reflexivity: Every element is related to itself.
Symmetry: If a is related to b, then b is related to a.
Transitivity: If a is related to b, and b is related to c, then a is related to c.
Equivalence Class: Group of elements related to each other under an equivalence relation.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
Example of modulo equivalence relation: For m = 3, [0] = {..., -6, -3, 0, 3, 6, ...}.
If a = 1, the equivalence class [1] contains all integers of the form 3k + 1, such as 1, 4, 7.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
Reflexive sees itself in the mirror, symmetric brings friends closer, transitive connects paths, together they make equivalence relations last.
Imagine three friends at a park. A says to B, 'We enjoy the same games,' and B replies to A the same, showing symmetry. They both claim C is also their friend, illustrating transitivity.
To remember properties of equivalence relations: 'RST' - Reflexive, Symmetric, Transitive.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Equivalence Relation
Definition:
A relation that is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive.
Term: Reflexive
Definition:
A relation R is reflexive if (a, a) is in R for every element a in set A.
Term: Symmetric
Definition:
A relation R is symmetric if (a, b) in R implies (b, a) in R.
Term: Transitive
Definition:
A relation R is transitive if (a, b) in R and (b, c) in R implies (a, c) in R.
Term: Equivalence Class
Definition:
The set of all elements in a given set that are equivalent to a specific element under an equivalence relation.
Term: Congruence Modulo
Definition:
A relation that determines if two integers have the same remainder when divided by a modulus.