Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Today, we're exploring the concept of closure of a relation. Who can tell me what we mean by the term 'closure' in this context?
Is closure about making a relation bigger to include certain properties?
Exactly! Closure refers to the smallest superset of a relation that satisfies a particular property. If the relation already meets the property, we don't need to add anything.
What kind of properties are we talking about?
Great question! Examples include reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity. We'll dive deeper into these as we continue.
Let's start with the reflexive closure. What does it mean for a relation to be reflexive?
I think it means every element relates to itself, like (a, a) must be in the relation.
Correct! To form a reflexive closure of a relation R, we take the union of R with all pairs of the form (a, a) where a is in our set A. If these pairs aren’t already in R, they will be added.
So if R has some missing (a, a) pairs, they will get added, right?
Exactly! We ensure the relation becomes reflexive by including only the necessary pairs.
Now, what about symmetric closure? What does it require?
Doesn’t it mean if (a, b) is in R, then (b, a) also must be there?
Exactly, well done! To create a symmetric closure, we take the union of R and its inverse where we swap the pairs. So we add (b, a) for each (a, b) in R.
But how do we know we’re not adding duplicates?
Good point! The union operation naturally handles that, keeping only unique pairs.
Lastly, let’s discuss transitive closure. It's more complicated; can anyone explain why?
Is it because we have to keep adding pairs until no more can be added?
Exactly! To form a transitive closure, we start with R and iteratively add pairs of the form (a, c) whenever both (a, b) and (b, c) are present. We keep doing this until no new pairs can be added.
So we might need to go through several rounds of expansion?
Yes! It's crucial to ensure that we've truly satisfied the transitive property.
To wrap up, can anyone summarize what we learned about the closures today?
Closure is the smallest superset of R that satisfies a property!
And we have reflexive, symmetric, and transitive closures, each unique in how we expand the relation!
That’s right! Remember these properties, as they are essential in working with relations. Well done, everyone!
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The section elaborates on the concept of closure pertaining to a relation and its properties, illustrating how one can form different types of closures (reflexive, symmetric, and transitive) through minimal expansion. It also emphasizes the significance of ensuring that the smallest superset of a relation upholds the desired property.
In this section, we delve into the concept of closure of a relation, which revolves around how we can expand a given relation to ensure it satisfies a certain property P. Let's break down the essential components:
By understanding these types of closures, we grasp how to analyze and modify relations systematically to achieve desired properties.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Next let us define what we call as closure of a relation. So, what do we mean by this? So, imagine you are given a set A that may be finite or infinite and you are given a relation R over the set A that means a relation R is a subset of A x A and I have some abstract property P, it is some abstract property and I am interested to check whether the relation R over the set A satisfies this property P or not? If it is satisfies the property well and good. But, that may not be the case R that is given to you need not satisfy the property.
The closure of a relation is a way to expand the relation in order to make it satisfy a certain desired property, referred to as property P. This property can be anything abstract, such as being reflexive, symmetric, or transitive. The original relation R is a subset of ordered pairs from set A. If R satisfies property P, then no modifications are necessary. However, if it does not, we need to add new pairs to form a larger relation that meets the criteria of property P.
Think of a classroom where students have different kinds of relationships with each other—friends, classmates, study partners, etc. A 'closure' of the relation could mean expanding a group to ensure that everyone is included in a study group. If some pairs of students don’t know each other (thus the relation is incomplete), we can add pairs to ensure that study partners can also help each other, fulfilling the property of being able to study together.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, my first abstract property is the reflexive property and this gives us what we call as reflexive closure of a relation. So, you are given a relation R over the set A and I am interested to see whether this relation R satisfies the reflexive property or not, reflexive over the set A, so that is what is the reflexive closure of the relation R. So, how can you construct a reflexive closure of R? Well you just take the union of R with all ordered pairs of the form (a, a) where a is present in your set A.
The reflexive closure of a relation R is constructed by ensuring that for every element 'a' in set A, the pair (a, a) is included in relation R. This is done by taking the union of R with the set of all pairs (a, a) for all 'a' in A. If (a, a) is already in R, including it again has no effect. This ensures that the relation is reflexive, meaning every element is related to itself.
Imagine a company where each employee has to have a report with themselves to ensure performance evaluations. If no employee has created their own report, then we need to ensure that for every employee, there is a report that says, for example, "Employee A has a report on Employee A". By adding such pairs, every employee can now see their own performance, fulfilling the requirement of being able to evaluate oneself.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now, let us take the case when my abstract property P is the symmetric property. So, again, I am given a relation R defined over the set A and I am interested to form a symmetric closure of R. Why I am calling it closure? Because I am trying to put a layer over, I am trying to enclose the original relation R and get a relation which has the original R as well as it satisfies the property P that is why it is called a closure.
To create the symmetric closure of a relation R, we need to ensure that if (a, b) is in R, then (b, a) must also be included in our new relation. This is achieved by forming the inverse of the relation R, which consists of all pairs (b, a) for every pair (a, b) in R. The union of R and its inverse gives us the symmetric closure, which retains all original relationships while ensuring that the property of symmetry is satisfied.
Think about friendships; if Alice is friends with Bob (Alice, Bob), then Bob must be friends with Alice (Bob, Alice) for the friendship to be considered symmetric. If we originally have only the relationship (Alice, Bob), our task is to add the friendship in the opposite direction to create a symmetric closure, ensuring that friendships are mutual.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now, what about the transitive closure? So, it turns out that finding transitive closure is not that simple, why so? Let me demonstrate that with an example. So, you might say that intuitively to find the transitive closure I add all ordered pairs of the form (a, c). Such that a is related to b as well as b is related to c in the relation R because only when I add such order tuples of the form (a, c) in the relation R, it will ensure that the transitive property is satisfied.
Finding the transitive closure can be complex because simply adding pairs of the form (a, c) when (a, b) and (b, c) exist is not always sufficient. In fact, to achieve a transitive closure, one may need to repeatedly check and add pairs until no more pairs can be added that would create a new relationship. This iterative process ensures that the established relationships are maintained across all connections in the transitive sense.
Consider a social network where friends of friends should be recognized as friends. If Alice is friends with Bob, and Bob is friends with Charlie, we not only need to recognize the direct friendships but also ensure that Alice can be considered a friend of Charlie as well. This means we must keep adding these indirect connections until all possible friend pairs are acknowledged, which mimics the process of expanding a transitive closure.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Closure of a Relation: The process of finding the minimal superset of a relation that satisfies a certain property.
Reflexive Closure: Adding pairs (a, a) for all elements in set A that are missing from relation R.
Symmetric Closure: Ensuring for every (a, b) in R, (b, a) is also included.
Transitive Closure: Iteratively adding pairs (a, c) wherever (a, b) and (b, c) exist until no new pairs can be added.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
Example of Reflexive Closure: Given R = {(1, 2)}, the reflexive closure would include {(1, 1), (2, 2)} added to R, making it {(1, 1), (1, 2), (2, 2)}.
Example of Symmetric Closure: Given R = {(1, 2)}, the symmetric closure would include (2, 1) making R = {(1, 2), (2, 1)}.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
If relations you want to close, add pairs with care, as one knows.
Imagine a party where every guest shakes hands, reflexivity makes sure no one is left alone, symmetry ensures each handshake is returned, and transitivity makes new friends through mutual acquaintances.
Remember 'RST' for Reflexive, Symmetric, and Transitive closures.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Closure of a Relation
Definition:
The smallest superset of a relation that satisfies a certain property.
Term: Reflexive Closure
Definition:
The expansion of a relation to ensure all elements relate to themselves.
Term: Symmetric Closure
Definition:
The expansion of a relation ensuring that if (a, b) is present, then (b, a) is also present.
Term: Transitive Closure
Definition:
The iterative process of adding pairs to a relation to ensure transitive property is satisfied.