Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Today we're going to explore how we can treat relations as sets. Can anyone tell me what set operations we can use?
We can use union, intersection, and difference!
That's correct! Let's start with the union. If we have R1 as 'x < y' and R2 as 'x > y', what do you think R1 union R2 would look like?
It would have pairs where x is not equal to y.
Exactly! So we can say it includes all pairs where x is different from y. Now, what about the intersection of R1 and R2?
That would be an empty set since x cannot be both less than and greater than y at the same time!
Perfect! The intersection is indeed empty here.
Next, let's talk about composing relations. Who can give me the definition of how we define composition?
If R is a relation from A to B and S is from B to C, the composition S o R gives a relation from A to C.
Right! And remember that the order of applying the relations matters. What happens if we switch them?
The composition will likely yield a different result!
Exactly! Composition isn't commutative. Now, can anyone explain what the n+1 power of a relation entails?
It's defined recursively; R to the power of n+1 is the composition of R to the power n with R.
Correct! And we use this to explore transitive relationships as well.
Now, let's connect this to graphs. Can someone explain how an element is related to itself in the m-th power of a relation?
There’s a directed path of length m from the node to itself.
Yes! This means we can visualize relations through paths in a directed graph. How does this help us?
It helps in understanding the transitive nature of relations and connects to powers!
Absolutely! Understanding paths in graphs reinforces our comprehension of relational powers.
Finally, let's discuss the closure of relations. Can anyone summarize what a closure does?
It's the smallest superset of R that satisfies a particular property P.
Spot on! We can consider reflexive, symmetric, and transitive properties. How would we create a reflexive closure?
By taking the union of R with all pairs of the form (a, a) for each a in our set A.
Right you are! And what about symmetric closure?
We take the union of R with its inverse, ensuring that if (a, b) is in R, then (b, a) is too.
Excellent explanation! Closure helps us understand how relations can be expanded while minimizing unnecessary additions.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The section explores how relations can be considered as sets to perform various operations, specifically focusing on the powers of relations, which are defined recursively through compositions. It highlights key concepts such as the transitive paths in directed graphs and provides examples for clarity.
In this section, we delve into the powers of a relation, which are central to understanding concepts in discrete mathematics. A relation can be thought of as a subset of Cartesian products of sets, and by treating relations as sets, we can carry out familiar set operations such as union, intersection, and difference.
Additionally, the composition of two relations R and S is introduced. If R represents a relation from set A to set B and S from B to C, the composition combines these pathways into a relation from A to C, denoted as S o R. The ordering of relations in composition is crucial and not commutative.
The 'n+1'th power of a relation R is defined recursively via composition. For example, R² is the composition of R with itself, encapsulating the transitive relationships established through the paths.
Each relation can be represented as a directed graph. The m-th power of a relation posits that an element is related to itself if there exists a directed path of corresponding length between nodes in the graph.
The section concludes by introducing the closure of a relation concerning specific properties, such as reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity, emphasizing operations that yield the smallest superset satisfying the desired property.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, once the definition of compositions of relations is given, we can define what we call as powers of a relation and how it is defined. So, imagine R is a relation from A to B that means R is a subset of A x B. Then the definition of powers of a relation is as follows; R1 is defined to be the relation R itself and then recursively I define the n + 1th power of R to be the composition of the relation which is nth power of R with the original relation R.
In this chunk, we are defining the concept of powers of a relation. A relation R going from set A to set B is defined as a subset of the Cartesian product of A and B, denoted A x B. Here, R1, which is the first power of R, is simply R itself. To find the power Rn+1, we take the composition of R with Rn, which indicates the order of operations matters. The construction builds on itself, recursively defining higher powers of the relation. This means that the nth power relates to how many times we can 'chain' connections through the relation R itself.
Imagine a party where you are connecting people through mutual friends. The first connection (R1) is simply the individuals at the party. The second connection (R2) represents direct friendships between those at the party, while R3 could represent friends of friends. Each step in composition broadens your understanding of how interconnected your social network is!
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So again, I stress here the order matters here, the n + 1th power is defined to be the composition of Rn with R that means you have to apply the relation R first and then you have to apply the relation Rn. It need not be equal to the composition of R with the nth power of R that may or may not be the case because in general the composition of two relations need not be commutative.
This chunk emphasizes the importance of order in defining the powers of a relation. Specifically, for the (n + 1)th power, we first apply R, then apply the previous power Rn. This is crucial as the direction or order of operations can lead to different results, known as non-commutativity in mathematics. Because of this characteristic, Rn+1 is not necessarily the same as R combined with Rn.
Think about following a recipe step by step. If you mix flour and sugar, then add eggs, you get a different mix than if you add eggs first and then mix in the sugar. The order in which ingredients or relational steps are combined matters, just like in our power relations!
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Let me demonstrate the powers of a relation with an example. Here I have defined a relation R consisting of the pairs (1, 1), (2, 1), (3, 2) and (4, 3). So, R1 as per my definition will be the relation R itself.
In this example, the relation R is given explicitly with pairs such as (1, 1), (2, 1), (3, 2), and (4, 3). R1, reflecting the first power, is just the relation itself. As we explore further powers, we will look at how we build R2 by composing R with itself, cataloging which pairs can be 'reachably' combined both ways from R's existing pairs.
Consider a small map in a town where locations (1, 2, 3, 4) represent different people, and the pairs represent direct acquaintances. R1 captures that direct connection; as you apply transformations (or powers), you can navigate through the network to find indirect acquaintances, just like how you might trace who knows who on a social map!
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now, if I want to compute R3 then it will be the composition of R2 with relation R. So, I will take this R2 here first and compose it with the original relation R that means the relation R has to be applied first and then on top of that the relation R2 has to be applied.
In this chunk, we are moving on to calculating R3, which involves taking the result of the previous power R2 and composing it with the original relation R. This shows the iterative nature of calculating higher powers, building upon the previous results to discover new connections available through R.
Continuing with our social map analogy, imagine you discover that connections among your friends can lead to a whole new set of acquaintances. If R2 contains people you can reach through one degree of separation, R3 reveals those who are two degrees away. Continuing this process maps a deeper layer of relationships among individuals in your network!
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now, next what we are going to discuss is a very nice interpretation of the powers of a relation in terms of a property in the corresponding graph. So, imagine you are given a relation over some set A consisting of n elements and suppose the relation is represented by a directed graph G.
This chunk introduces the concept of interpreting powers of a relation through the lens of graph theory. In this context, the relation can be viewed as a directed graph G, where elements from the set A are represented as vertices. The edges between vertices (relationships) illustrate how elements are related, and the sequence of connections (or paths) from one vertex to another reveals the powers of that relation.
Imagine a city where places are intersections and roads are the directed edges of your graph. If you start at one intersection (A) and want to explore how to return to A via a series of roads (representing powers of the relation), each layer tells you what newer routes exist based on how many roads you traverse, expanding your understanding of the city layout!
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, the claim here is the following the ordered pair (a, a) will be present in the mth power of the relation if and only if, there is a directed path of length m from the node a to the node a in the digraph of your relation.
In this chunk, we are asserting a key result regarding directed paths in graphs. Specifically, an ordered pair (a, a) exists in the mth power of the relation if and only if there is a directed path of length m that starts and ends at a. This shows a direct relationship between the powers of a relation and the paths in a corresponding graph.
Think of a round trip from home (A) to an amusement park (B) and back. If you can make a round trip in M different ways by following a series of routes (the edges of our graph), this reflects how many ways you can reach back home as defined by the mth power of the relation. Each route represents a collection of steps you take!
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Union of Relations: Combining relations to include pairs from both.
Intersection of Relations: Finding common elements in relations.
Powers of Relations: Recursive definition through composition.
Graphical Representation: Paths representing relational connections.
Closures: Minimal expansion of relations to satisfy certain properties.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
Example 1: The union of R1 (x < y) and R2 (x > y) consists of all tuples (x, y) where x is different from y.
Example 2: For a relation R = {(1,2), (2,3)}, its second power R² will include pairs like (1,3) if via (1,2) and (2,3).
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
To find the union of sets, make pairs, don't forget. But intersection's the clash, no pairs, what a crash!
Imagine a town where each person represents a relation. They connect through friendship (union) or fight (intersection), but they need a path (composition) to get from one side to the other.
Remember the acronym 'U,I,C' for Union, Intersection, and Composition of relations.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Relation
Definition:
A set of ordered pairs where each pair relates elements from two sets.
Term: Power of a Relation
Definition:
Defined recursively as the composition of the relation with itself.
Term: Union
Definition:
An operation that combines two sets to include all elements from both.
Term: Intersection
Definition:
An operation that yields a set of elements common to both sets.
Term: Composition
Definition:
An operation where two relations are combined to illustrate their combined effect.
Term: Transitive Property
Definition:
A property that relates elements through a sequence of relations.
Term: Closure
Definition:
The smallest superset of a relation that satisfies a certain property.
Term: Reflexive Closure
Definition:
The smallest expansion of a relation to ensure it is reflexive.
Term: Symmetric Closure
Definition:
The smallest modification of a relation so that if (a, b) is in R, (b, a) is also in R.
Term: Directed Graph
Definition:
A graph where edges are directed, illustrating relationships as arrows.