Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Welcome to our first session! Today, we are going to discuss rings. Can anyone tell me what a ring is in the context of mathematics?
Isn't a ring a structure that has a set and two operations?
Exactly! A ring consists of a set combined with two operations: addition and multiplication. We denote our ring by ℝ. What are the requirements for these operations?
The definition includes closure, associativity, and the existence of identity elements.
And commutativity for addition, right?
Yes! Great memory! Just remember the acronym CCIA for Closure, Commutativity, Identity, and Associativity. Let’s now dive into some examples.
Now, let's talk about fields. How does a field differ from a ring?
A field has the same properties as a ring but requires every non-zero element to have an inverse under multiplication.
Right! Remember, we can think of fields as special rings. To help memorize this, think of 'F' for 'Field' with 'Fully Invertible' since all non-zero elements are invertible.
So, does this mean that in rings, not all elements necessarily have inverses?
Exactly! Rings may contain elements that lack inverses. Let’s move on to the properties of polynomials over rings.
We can define polynomials over rings. Can anyone tell me what that looks like?
I think they take the form of coefficients multiplied by powers of a variable, like we learned in algebra.
Correct! In a ring, a polynomial can be expressed as aₙxⁿ + aₙ₋₁xⁿ⁻¹ + ... + a₀, where aᵢ are elements of the ring. The operations we perform on these polynomials follow the ring operations.
So, if we were to add two polynomials, we would add their coefficients according to the ring's addition?
Exactly! That’s a great observation! To summarize, when we add or multiply polynomials over a ring, we still need to satisfy our ring axioms. Always remember R (Ring) = P (Polynomial).
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
In this section, we delve into rings and fields as fundamental structures in discrete mathematics, emphasizing the axioms governing rings and fields. We also examine polynomials over rings, providing concrete examples and establishing how abstract algebra applies to computational contexts.
In this section, we explore the critical concepts of rings, fields, and polynomials, which are central to discrete mathematics and abstract algebra. A ring is defined as a set equipped with two operations that satisfy specific axioms, including the properties of closure, associativity, identity elements, and distributive laws. We distinguish rings from fields, where every non-zero element must possess a multiplicative inverse. Throughout the section, we analyze examples, such as rings of integers with modulo operations and discuss the concept of invertible elements within rings. We further extend our discussion to polynomials over rings, highlighting how polynomial operations align with the defined operations in rings, and the necessary conditions for closure and distributivity. Understanding these algebraic structures paves the way for applications in computer science and beyond, reinforcing the relevance of abstract mathematical concepts.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, let us begin with the definition of a ring. So, we denote our ring by this notation ℝ and it is an algebraic structure. So, namely a set, set of values, it could be a finite set, it could be infinite set, so, it is a set and there are 2 operators plus (+) and dot (∙) which are defined over the elements of this set. I stress that these are not integer plus and integer dot they are just some abstract operations.
A ring is a foundational concept in abstract algebra, essentially consisting of a set of elements combined with two operations, typically addition and multiplication. The key here is that these operations are abstract and do not necessarily correspond to traditional arithmetic. The operations must be defined such that they adhere to specific rules, or axioms, that we will discuss further.
Think of a ring as a musical ensemble. Each musician (element of the set) has their own instrument (operation), but together they create a symphony (the algebraic structure). The way they interact (the abstract operations) doesn't have to reflect how musicians play in a typical orchestra setting.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
But for the sake of notation we are using this plus notation and dot notation. So, we will say that this set ℝ along with these 2 operations plus and dot will be called a ring if all the following ring axioms are satisfied. Axiom number 1: we need the set ℝ to satisfy the properties of an abelian group with respect to your + operation.
A ring is defined by three axioms related to the operations that must hold true for the set elements. The first axiom requires the adherence to the properties of an abelian group for addition: closure (the result of adding any two elements is still in the set), associativity (the way in which elements are grouped doesn’t change the result), identity (there exists an element that, when added to any other, doesn’t change it), inverse (each element has an opposite that, when added, results in the identity), and commutativity (the order of addition doesn’t matter).
Imagine a group project. The team must work together (closure) without anyone dropping out (associativity), each member must contribute equally (identity), and if someone leaves, another must step in (inverse), plus it doesn't matter who presents first (commutativity).
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
The second axiom that set ℝ should satisfy is the following: we require that the dot operation should satisfy the closure property namely, you take any pair of elements (a, b) from your set ℝ and you perform the dot operation you should get back again an element from the same set ℝ.
The closure property indicates that when we apply the dot operation to any two elements of the ring, the result must also be an element of the same ring. This ensures that the system remains consistent within itself and does not produce elements outside the defined set.
Consider a factory producing toys. When the factory combines parts (elements), the result should always be a completed toy (the output must also be part of the toy set), ensuring that all products are usable and relevant to their purpose.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
We require the dot operation to be associative. That means, it does not matter in what order you perform the dot operation on 3 elements, you should get back the same answer. And we demand the presence of an identity element with respect to the dot operation.
The associativity of the dot operation states that the grouping of elements does not affect the outcome of the operation. Additionally, there must be an identity element such that when multiplied with any element of the ring, the result is the element itself. This is crucial, as it provides a baseline or standard for multiplication in the ring.
Think about a group of friends deciding what movie to watch. It doesn't matter whether they first decide on the genre or the actors (associativity)—the final choice remains the same. Also, having a go-to classic movie (identity element) means that no matter what movies are discussed, they can always return to it if none seem appealing.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
The third property or the so-called third ring axiom that needs to be satisfied is that your dot operation should be distributive over the plus.
Distributive property states that for any three elements a, b, and c in the ring, the operation of multiplication distributes over addition. This means that when you multiply a by the sum of b and c, it is the same as multiplying a by b and then a by c, then adding those results together. This axiom is critical in ensuring the interaction between the operations is consistent.
Think of it like sharing pizza. If you order one large pizza (a) and split it into two groups (b and c), each friend can get their share. No matter how you stack up the slices for each group, the total amount of pizza eaten remains the same.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Let us see some examples for ring. So, recall our set ℤ is the set of integers 0 to N - 1 and suppose I take 2 operations here: plus operation is the addition modulo N (+) and my multiplication operation is multiplication modulo N (∙)...
The example illustrates the concept of rings using the set of integers defined under modulo operations. When performing addition and multiplication under these operations, the set behaves according to the ring axioms, demonstrating closure, associativity, the presence of identity elements, and the distributive property.
Imagine a classroom where students can only pass on a piece of candy to another student without exceeding a certain number. When they add or multiply candies, they must still adhere to the classroom rules (modulo operations), but they follow all the rules effectively to ensure each student can still enjoy candy.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, the next thing that we want to discuss is the invertible elements of a ring. So, imagine you are given a ring and if you see closely the ring axioms, it turns out that it is not the case that every element should have a multiplicative inverse...
Within a ring, not all elements have to possess a multiplicative inverse (an element which, when multiplied with the original element, yields the identity element of one). The subset of elements that do possess this property is termed U(ℝ), or the group of units, illustrating an important distinction within ring theory.
Consider a toolbox, where not all tools can work as replacements for each other (not all have an inverse). But some, like a screwdriver or wrench can be paired back with their proper counterparts offering functional versatility (invertibility).
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, we have to show the closure property. To prove this theorem that the collection of all invertible elements of an abstract ring constitutes a subgroup with respect to the dot operation...
To demonstrate that the invertible elements of a ring also form a subgroup under the dot operation, we must prove that the product of any two invertible elements remains invertible. The closure property, when proven, shows that the multiplicative nature of these elements is consistent and well-defined within the ring.
Think of a club of members. If every pair of members works together effectively (closure) to reach an end goal, they ensure that any projects they work on remain successful and yield results (they remain functional and valid within their community).
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So now what we are going to do is we are going to extend our definition of ring to another interesting algebraic structure which we called as a field. So a field is an algebraic structure it is a set of values and there are 2 operations...
A field builds upon the concept of a ring but with stricter criteria. In a field, not only must addition and multiplication be defined and follow the ring axioms, but also every non-zero element must be invertible, meaning divisions and more complex algebraic operations can be performed naturally.
Consider a library system where every book (element) has a reference (inverse) in other systems. If someone can retrieve and reference any book without restrictions (field), the library operates efficiently, allowing for various interlibrary relational benefits.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
The field axioms are as follows: the axiom number 1 is that the set F along with the plus operation should constitute an abelian group. The second property that we demand here is the following if I exclude the additive inverse and see...
The axioms of a field include forming an abelian group under addition; excluding the additive identity, the remaining elements form another abelian group under multiplication; and multiplication must be distributive over addition.
Imagine a dinner party where everyone shares their favorite dish (addition forms a group), and if you exclude the people who don’t participate (the additive identity), you would still have a full table enjoying their meals (the rest forming another group).
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now the next thing that we want to discuss here is the polynomials over rings, which is a very important concept used in computer science. So, imagine you are given a ring with some abstract plus an abstract dot operation...
Polynomials can be defined in a similar way as we defined them over integers, but here the coefficients come from a ring, and the operations used are those defined by the ring. This allows for the extension of polynomial algebra into more abstract realms while maintaining structure.
Think of creating a recipe where you're allowed to mix different ingredients (coefficients from the ring). Each recipe (polynomial) can have varied complexities depending on the available ingredients, adding to the variety yet keeping consistency with base cooking rules (operations from the ring).
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Rings: Defined by two operations and several axioms; not all elements have inverses.
Fields: A special type of ring where all non-zero elements are invertible.
Polynomials: Represented as a sum of terms involving coefficients from a ring.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
Addition of polynomials over integers includes coefficients added normally, while multiplication follows polynomial rules.
Rings of integers with modulo operations serve as practical examples of abstract rings.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
Rings and fields, they play their parts; One has inverses, the other charts.
Once upon a time, in Mathland, a set of numbers lived together in harmony called a ring. They loved to add and multiply, and some even had magical inverses—these special numbers formed a field where every non-zero member could find a partner.
CCIA for Rings: C for Closure, C for Commutativity, I for Identity, and A for Associativity.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Ring
Definition:
An algebraic structure consisting of a set equipped with two operations satisfying specific axioms.
Term: Field
Definition:
A special type of ring where every non-zero element has a multiplicative inverse.
Term: Polynomial
Definition:
An expression involving variables raised to powers and coefficients from a ring.
Term: Axioms
Definition:
Fundamental principles or rules that a mathematical structure must satisfy.
Term: Invertible Elements
Definition:
Elements of a ring that have a multiplicative inverse.