Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Today, we're discussing rings, an essential algebraic structure in mathematics. A ring is defined as a set combined with two operations. Can anyone tell me what those operations are?
Is it addition and multiplication?
Correct! We often refer to these operations as plus and dot, but they are abstract operations over the set. Now, to form a ring, what properties do you think these operations must satisfy?
I think one of them should be associativity for both operations.
Exactly! Associativity is crucial. In fact, we need our set to satisfy several axioms, starting with the set being an abelian group under addition, which includes properties like closure and commutativity.
So, does that mean there must be an identity element for addition?
Yes! That identity element is often denoted as zero in our notation. Additionally, for multiplication, we also need an identity, which is 1.
What about the distributive property?
Great question! The distributive property must hold for multiplication over addition. This means if you have elements a, b, and c, the second distributive law is also necessary. Any questions before we recap?
In summary, for a set to be a ring, it must be an abelian group under addition, adhere to closure and associativity under multiplication, and satisfy the distributive property. Now, let's move on to understand examples of rings.
So, let's look at a familiar example: the integers modulo N. Can anyone explain how addition and multiplication work in this context?
Is it like, if I add two numbers, I just take their result modulo N?
Exactly! If you add two integers within the range of 0 to N-1, you'll wrap around when you reach N. What about multiplication?
We also take the result modulo N, right? So we ensure it’s still within that range?
Correct! Both operations keep the results confined to the set. Now, can anyone give me an example of an element that does not have a multiplicative inverse in this ring?
How about the element 2 in Z_4? It doesn’t multiply with any element to give us 1!
Right again! That leads us to the concept of **unit elements** within a ring. Remember, a unit is an element that has a multiplicative inverse.
To summarize, Z_N exemplifies a ring where both addition and multiplication are performed modulo N. However, not all elements need to have inverses. Now let's move on to fields.
We've discussed rings; now let's explore fields. A field is basically a special type of ring. What do you think sets fields apart from rings?
Is it that every non-zero element has an inverse?
Exactly! In a field, except for the zero element, every element must be invertible under multiplication. This leads us to our important field axioms.
What are those axioms?
First, the set must be an abelian group under addition. Secondly, when we exclude the additive identity, the remaining elements must also form an abelian group under multiplication. Finally, multiplication must distribute over addition.
So, does this mean all polynomial functions are fields too?
Not all polynomial rings are fields, but when you have a prime modulus, then integers modulo p will form a field, as every non-zero element is invertible.
Awesome! So, rings have more restrictions than fields in terms of which elements are required to have inverses.
Exactly! To summarize, fields extend the concept of rings by ensuring all non-zero elements have inverses, allowing for more complex operations. Now we will shift our focus to polynomials over rings.
Now let's discuss polynomials. What is a polynomial, and how does it relate to rings?
It's like an expression of variables raised to powers, right?
That's right! A polynomial can be expressed in the form of coefficients multiplied by variables raised to powers. But over a ring, we use the ring’s operations for both addition and multiplication.
So if I have a polynomial defined over Z_N, I would add and multiply using modulo N?
Exactly! This is an essential concept - expanding the traditional definition of polynomials to various rings. How would you add two polynomials defined over Z_N?
We would add the coefficients of corresponding powers modulo N?
Precisely! Do you remember how we multiply them?
Yes! We have to consider the degree and multiply all combinations of coefficients, ensuring to add them up after performing the multiplication modulo N.
Excellent! In summary, polynomials over rings require that we use the ring’s operations, thus generalizing our understanding of polynomials significantly. Now, let’s check a few examples.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The section examines the algebraic structures known as rings and fields, defining their axioms and properties. It also introduces polynomials over rings, explaining how operations are generalized from traditional polynomial definitions.
In this section, we delve into the fundamental concepts of rings and fields, both essential algebraic structures in discrete mathematics. A ring is defined as a set equipped with two operations (often referred to as plus and dot) that satisfy specific axioms:
Examples of rings include the integers modulo N, where both operations respect these axioms. The section also talks about the invertible elements in a ring, leading to the definition of the group of units, U(ℝ), where U(ℝ) contains all elements with a multiplicative inverse.
Next, we extend the definition of rings to fields, which are rings where every non-zero element is also invertible. The axioms for a field demand that the additive group property and the multiplicative group property (excluding zero) be satisfied, and we observe that fields allow for a richer structure.
Finally, we discuss polynomials over rings, which generalize traditional polynomial definitions to include coefficients from any ring. Polynomials follow the same operations, using the ring's addition and multiplication, maintaining closure and associative properties under these definitions. This sets the foundation for polynomial algebra in abstract algebra.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
We denote our ring by this notation ℝ and it is an algebraic structure. So, namely a set, set of values, it could be a finite set, it could be infinite set, so, it is a set and there are 2 operators plus (+) and dot (∙) which are defined over the elements of this set. We will say that this set ℝ along with these 2 operations plus and dot will be called a ring if all the following ring axioms are satisfied.
A ring is defined as a set equipped with two operations, typically referred to as addition (denoted by '+') and multiplication (denoted by '∙'). These operations are not limited to the usual addition and multiplication of integers; rather, they are abstract operations defined over the elements of the set. For a set to qualify as a ring, it must meet certain axioms clearly outlined in later sections.
Think of a ring like a toolbox. The set is your toolbox, and the operations are the tools (like a hammer for addition and a screwdriver for multiplication). If you can use your tools effectively according to certain rules (axioms), then you have a well-functioning toolbox or ring.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Axiom number 1: we need the set ℝ to satisfy the properties of an abelian group with respect to your + operation. We need closure property, we need plus operation to be associative, we require the presence of some special identity element which we denote by this ‘0’ such that if you perform the plus operation with element a you should get back the element a for every element a from the set ℝ. We need the presence of additive inverse and we need the operation plus to be commutative.
The first axiom requires that the set ℝ with the addition operation (+) behaves like an abelian group. This means that: 1) there is closure under addition (adding two elements results in an element in the set), 2) the addition is associative (the grouping of additions does not affect the outcome), 3) there is an identity element (0) such that adding it to any element x returns x, 4) each element has an additive inverse (for every x, there is a -x such that x + (-x) gives 0), and 5) addition is commutative (x + y = y + x).
Imagine a popular card game where players can only add points to their score. The rules dictate that if you draw certain cards, you can only add to your score. The first rule of being able to add your score without exceeding the maximum score reflects the closure property, just like in a ring. Every player can also exchange points (add inverses), ensuring fairness in the game.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
The second axiom that set ℝ should satisfy is the following: we require that the dot operation should satisfy the closure property namely, you take any pair of elements (a, b) from your set ℝ and you perform the dot operation you should get back again an element from the same set ℝ. We require the dot operation to be associative. And we demand the presence of an identity element with respect to the dot operation.
The second axiom focuses on the dot operation (multiplication). It states that for any two elements in the set ℝ, the result of their multiplication should also be in ℝ (closure). Additionally, the multiplication operation must be associative, meaning the order in which you multiply does not affect the result. There must exist an identity element (denoted 1) such that when you multiply it with any element a, you get back a (a∙1 = a).
Consider baking in a kitchen. If you add ingredients (dot operation) and you only use things available in your pantry (closure), it's as if all mixes yield a dish from your pantry. If you pour milk and then add sugar, it doesn't matter if you first mix them together or add them separately (associativity), and the milk acts as the identity, maintaining the same base taste.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
The third property or the so-called third ring axiom that needs to be satisfied is that your dot operation should be distributive over the plus. If you take any triplet of elements from the set ℝ called them as a, b, c, then it does not matter whether you first perform the plus operation on b and c.
The third axiom establishes the distributive property of multiplication over addition. This means if you multiply an element by the sum of two other elements, it should be the same as multiplying the element by each of the added elements first and then adding the results. Formally, this can be expressed as a∙(b + c) = a∙b + a∙c. This property must hold true in both directions (left and right).
Think of distributing candies among friends. If you have a bag of candies (the total) and you want to share some with your two friends (addition), you can either pour candies from the bag to each friend one by one or combine the candies meant for each friend first and then share from the total (distributive property). The total candies remain the same regardless of how you distribute.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Recall our set ℤ is the set of integers 0 to N - 1and N. Suppose I take 2 operations here: plus operation is the addition modulo N (+) and my multiplication operation is multiplication modulo N (∙).
An example of a ring can be the set of integers modulo N, denoted ℤ. For instance, if we choose N = 4, the elements are {0, 1, 2, 3}. Here, addition and multiplication are performed modulo 4 (e.g., 2 + 3 = 1 in modulo 4). This set satisfies all ring axioms, making it a valid ring.
Imagine a clock with numbers from 0 to 11. If it's 10 o'clock now, and you add 5 hours, you arrive at 3 o'clock due to wrapping around (modular addition). The number of hours represents elements in ℤ, and the way we add or multiply the hours represents the operations on a ring.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now we want to discuss the invertible elements of a ring. It is not the case that every element should have a multiplicative inverse. The presence of identity element 1 is required, but not every element has a multiplicative inverse.
Not all elements in a ring are invertible; meaning not every element will have a multiplicative inverse. An element 'x' in a ring has a multiplicative inverse if there exists another element 'y' such that x∙y = 1 (the identity element). For instance, in the ring ℤ_4, the element 2 does not have an inverse because no element multiplied by 2 gives 1 (mod 4).
Picture a school club where each member has a unique badge number. Only some members can swap badges (invert) with others to create pairs that form complete sets. For example, if a member number 2 cannot find a partner to form a complete pair from the club's set of badges, they are like an element without an inverse—existing but unable to fully participate in the exchange.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now we are going to define a special set which I call as U(ℝ) which is basically the collection of all invertible elements with respect to the multiplication operation.
The set U(ℝ) is defined as the collection of all elements in a ring ℝ that are invertible under multiplication. An element 'x' belongs to U(ℝ) if there is some element 'u' such that x∙u = 1 (the multiplicative identity). These invertible elements play a critical role in the structure of the ring.
In the context of a sports league, think of players with unique abilities that allow them to exchange roles (invert) with each other during a game. Only certain players (invertible elements) possess the versatility to switch positions dynamically, maintaining the team's balance and strategy during the game.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now we are going to extend our definition of ring to another interesting algebraic structure which we called as a field. A field is a set of values and there are 2 operations; 2 abstract operations plus and dot, which are defined over the elements of this set F.
A field is a specific type of ring with additional properties. All the elements of the field, except for the additive identity (0), have multiplicative inverses. Thus, in a field, both addition and multiplication (excluding zero) must behave like abelian groups. The requirement for invertibility adds a new layer to the definitions we have outlined for rings.
If you think of baking as a ring activity, where you mix flour and sugar, a field can be likened to a fully equipped bakery where every ingredient can be duplicated or swapped inexpensively. Here, each ingredient's flexibility (invertibility) opens up possibilities for endless delightful recipes, ensuring that even when something is used (like 0), the rest can still create delicious treats.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Rings: Defined by two operations that satisfy closure, associativity, identity, and distributivity.
Fields: A special type of ring where every non-zero element has an inverse.
Polynomials: Expressions formed with coefficients from a ring, utilizing ring operations.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
Example of a Ring: Z_N acts as a ring with addition and multiplication modulo N.
Example of a Field: Z_p (where p is prime) acts as a field because all non-zero elements are invertible.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
Rings and numbers take a swirl, add and multiply, let operations unfurl.
Imagine you have a magical box (ring). Inside it, numbers can play by rules: they can pair up and do tricks as long as they remember to follow the magical operations of plus and dot!
Remember R.A.F. for Rings, Axioms, and Fields - A helpful acronym to keep in mind the main concepts.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Ring
Definition:
An algebraic structure consisting of a set equipped with two operations that satisfy certain axioms.
Term: Field
Definition:
A special type of ring wherein every non-zero element has a multiplicative inverse.
Term: Polynomial
Definition:
An expression that represents a sum of terms, each composed of a coefficient and a variable raised to a non-negative integer power.
Term: Unit Element
Definition:
An element in a ring that has a multiplicative inverse.
Term: Axioms
Definition:
Basic assumptions or rules that must hold true for a mathematical structure.