Practice Ethics in Scientific Research - 3.4 | Scientific Inquiry and Investigation (IB MYP) | IB MYP Class 10 Sciences (Group 4)- Physics
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

Define ethics in scientific research.

💡 Hint: Think about the moral principles involved.

Question 2

Easy

What is informed consent?

💡 Hint: Recall the process of explaining the study to participants.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What is informed consent?

  • A method of collecting data
  • A process of getting participant agreement with full knowledge
  • A way to minimize research time

💡 Hint: Look for what participants must be aware of before joining.

Question 2

True or False: Ethical considerations are only important when dealing with human participants.

  • True
  • False

💡 Hint: Think about different types of living beings involved in research.

Solve and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

You are designing a study that involves both human and animal subjects. What ethical guidelines will you implement to ensure the welfare of both groups?

💡 Hint: Think about the guidelines discussed for each type of participant.

Question 2

Analyze a historical case where ethical guidelines were ignored in research. What lessons can be learned?

💡 Hint: Recall examples of studies with significant public backlash.

Challenge and get performance evaluation