Practice Typical Bug Status Flow - 7.2.1 | Defect Lifecycle and Bug Reporting | Quality Analysis
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What does the 'New' status signify in the bug status flow?

💡 Hint: Think about the very first entry in the bug lifecycle.

Question 2

Easy

What happens during the 'Open' stage?

💡 Hint: Consider what actions are taking place to understand the bug.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What is the first state of a bug in the Typical Bug Status Flow?

  • Open
  • Fixed
  • New

💡 Hint: Think of how a bug enters the system.

Question 2

True or False: The 'Verified' status indicates that a bug is confirmed as fixed.

  • True
  • False

💡 Hint: Consider what verification means in software testing.

Solve 3 more questions and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

A bug reported as 'Reopened' has a developer's fix implemented. However, upon further testing by QA, it appears the bug still persists. Discuss the implications for the developer's approach and quality practices.

💡 Hint: Consider the roles of collaboration in software development.

Question 2

In a project delay scenario, bugs are marked 'Deferred', but the product release is around the corner. Explain how the team can effectively manage these deferred bugs.

💡 Hint: Focus on strategic prioritization.

Challenge and get performance evaluation