Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skillsβperfect for learners of all ages.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Lesson
Welcome everyone! Today we're going to delve into Boundary Value Analysis, or BVA. Can anyone tell me why boundaries are essential in software testing?
Boundaries are where we often find defects, right? Like off-by-one errors?
Exactly! BVA focuses on testing not just the values within a valid range but also right at the edges of that range. This is where bugs tend to occur most frequently. Let's remember: 'Test the limits of the value range!' That's a guiding principle for BVA.
Can you give us an example of what those boundary values might look like?
Sure! For a range of [1, 100], we'd test 1, 100, as well as 0 and 101. This way, we ensure we cover both valid and invalid scenarios. Remembering these boundary values is critical; think of using '1, edge, 100' as a mnemonic!
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Lesson
Now letβs talk about the systematic rules for deriving test cases with BVA. What are some rules you think we should apply when determining these test values?
I think we should test the minimum and maximum values... and values just above and below those!
That's right! We have at least six critical test values to consider: the minimum, just above the minimum, the maximum, just below the maximum, just below the minimum, and just above the maximum. This way, we're covering every close edge! Remember: 'Six points for success!'
What about testing with different data types, like strings or arrays?
Great question! The same principles apply. For example, with strings, we focus on lengths. If a string's required length is between 5 to 10 characters, test cases for 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, and 11 would be key. This creates a very targeted approach.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Lesson
Now letβs see how BVA integrates with Equivalence Class Testing, or ECT. Why do you think it's useful to combine these two techniques?
Maybe because ECT identifies broad input categories, and BVA focuses on the critical boundary checks within those categories?
Correct! ECT helps us identify which sets of inputs require testing, while BVA ensures that we probe those boundary values most critical for catching defects. Together, they create a comprehensive testing strategy.
Can you give us a case where we may combine the two?
Absolutely! Imagine a function that processes age. Using ECT, we identify valid classes for age inputs as 0-120. Then, applying BVA, we can check the boundaries at 0, 1, 119, 120, -1, and 121 to ensure robust testing. Always remember: 'Combine to refine your tests!'
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Lesson
Finally, letβs delve into the limitations of BVA. Why might it not be sufficient on its own?
It doesnβt check every possible input, and might miss bugs outside the edge cases!
Exactly! BVA primarily focuses on edges, potentially overlooking defects arising from the regular input values or non-ordered data types. Therefore, using it alongside ECT is vital to cover all angles.
What about performance issues? Can BVA help with those?
BVA isn't designed to address internal performance problems directly but can help expose critical logical errors that might lead to performance degradation. Always think, 'Test smart, not just hard!'
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Lesson
To wrap up, what are some best practices you think we could adopt when using BVA?
Create detailed test plans, and keep track of change logs to update edge scenarios as requirements change!
Very insightful! Keeping documentation precise helps in aligning tests with features. Another best practice is to frequently review boundary tests in response to functionality changes. The mnemonic 'Inspect, Adapt, Ensure' could help you remember.
Should we also think about user experience when making our boundary tests?
Absolutely! User experience should guide how you create test cases, ensuring that tests reflect real-world use. Remember, 'Test as the user would!'
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
Boundary Value Analysis (BVA) is a vital black-box testing technique concentrating on the edges of input value ranges, where errors frequently occur. This section details specific rules for choosing test cases at boundaries and suggests how to effectively apply BVA alongside Equivalence Class Testing (ECT) to ensure thorough software testing.
Boundary Value Analysis (BVA) is a critical technique used in black-box testing, emphasizing the importance of testing boundary values where defects tend to occur frequently. This section presents systematic rules for deriving test cases that leverage the statistical likelihood of errors at the edges of input ranges, making BVA crucial for effective software testing.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
For a Specified Numeric Range [min, max] (Inclusive):
Consider an input variable X that accepts integer values within a defined inclusive range, say from min to max (e.g., 1 to 100). The critical test values derived from BVA would include:
1. Minimum Value (min): The absolute smallest valid value. (e.g., 1)
2. Value Just Above Minimum (min + 1): The smallest valid value that is not the minimum. (e.g., 2)
3. Maximum Value (max): The absolute largest valid value. (e.g., 100)
4. Value Just Below Maximum (max - 1): The largest valid value that is not the maximum. (e.g., 99)
5. Value Just Below Minimum (min - 1): The largest invalid value that is immediately adjacent to the valid range (first invalid below). (e.g., 0)
6. Value Just Above Maximum (max + 1): The smallest invalid value that is immediately adjacent to the valid range (first invalid above). (e.g., 101)
Example: An input field for Quantity accepts integers between 1 and 100 (inclusive).
1. Valid Boundary Values: 1, 2, 99, 100.
2. Invalid Boundary Values: 0 (just below min), 101 (just above max).
When testing numbers within a specified range, it is important to evaluate values that are at the boundaries of this range, plus just inside and just outside those boundaries. The values we focus on are the minimum and maximum values, values that are just above or below these limits, and invalid values that are immediately next to the valid range. Testing at these boundary points is essential because most errors occur near the edges, like how a locksmith needs to test the boundaries of a lock's tolerance.
Imagine a teacher who scores tests on a scale from 1 to 100. If a student scores exactly 100, they get an A. But if they score 101, they fail. The teacher must check the boundaries (0, 1, 100, and 101) to ensure the grading system works correctly. If only the center scores are checked, like 50 or 75, they might miss these crucial errors.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
For Input Lengths (Strings, Arrays, Lists):
Apply the same min, min+1, max-1, max logic to the specified valid length of a string, array, or list.
Example: A Password field requires a length between 8 and 15 characters (inclusive).
1. Valid Length Boundary Values: 8 characters, 9 characters, 14 characters, 15 characters.
2. Invalid Length Boundary Values: 7 characters (just below min), 16 characters (just above max).
Similar to numeric ranges, when testing a field that has a specific length requirement, we must thoroughly examine the lengths specified at the boundaries. We evaluate the minimum lengths, just above the minimum, just below the maximum, and the maximum length itself, as well as values that are just outside these boundaries. Ensuring robust validation at these points helps catch issues like accidentally allowing invalid inputs.
Think about a sweater size that can be Small (S), Medium (M), Large (L), and X-Large (XL). If the cutoff for the Medium size is set as 40 inches, checking at 39 and 41 inches will help ensure that the system correctly distinguishes Medium from Small and Large. If a person wearing a 39-inch sweater tries to get a Medium-sized sweatshirt, the system should deny it.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
For Floating-Point Numbers:
While the concept is the same, selecting "just inside" or "just outside" needs careful consideration due to floating-point precision. It usually involves picking values very close to the boundary.
Example: DiscountRate between 0.0 and 1.0.
1. Valid: 0.0, 0.001, 0.999, 1.0
2. Invalid: -0.001, 1.001
When working with floating-point numbers, it's crucial to recognize that precise representation and small variations can affect the boundaries. Here, we need to be cautious and select values that are extremely close to the defined limits. Since floating-point arithmetic can lead to inaccuracies, identifying true boundaries becomes more complex than with integers.
Imagine a precision scale used for shipping, which measures weight in grams. If the valid weight for shipping is set between 0.0 grams and 1.0 gram, you need to test weights very near to these limits. Checking 0.0, 0.0001, and just under 1.0 gram helps ensure the scale correctly recognizes weights at both ends, similar to how a chef would precisely measure ingredients for a fine dish.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Output Boundaries:
BVA can also be applied to output domains if the output values themselves have defined ranges. Design inputs that are expected to produce these boundary output values.
Example: A TemperatureConverter that outputs Celsius values between -50.0 and 50.0.
1. Inputs would be chosen such that the expected output is -50.0, -49.9, 49.9, 50.0.
Just as we test inputs for validity, we also test outputs to ensure they fall within expected ranges. When the output of a function has specific defined boundaries, we must ensure to craft inputs that trigger these exact outputs. This ensures we are capturing potential errors in how the software processes inputs to outputs.
Think about a thermostat that should maintain temperatures between 0 to 100 degrees Celsius. If the system is designed to output these temperatures, a user testing should include temperatures just below 0, exactly 0, just above 100, and exactly 100 degrees. This guarantees that the thermostat maintains its expected limits effectively, similar to how a carβs speedometer should accurately reflect speeds when correlated with the engine's performance.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Standard BVA (often referred to as "6-Point BVA" or "Robust BVA"):
This is the most common and recommended approach for thoroughness. For every defined boundary, it includes three specific test values: the boundary value itself, a value immediately adjacent inside the valid range, and a value immediately adjacent outside the valid range. This is applied to both the minimum and maximum boundaries of a range.
Test Values Generated (for a single range [min, max]):
1. min - 1 (Invalid, just below minimum)
2. min (Valid, exact minimum)
3. min + 1 (Valid, just above minimum)
4. max - 1 (Valid, just below maximum)
5. max (Valid, exact maximum)
6. max + 1 (Invalid, just above maximum)
Example: Integer input X where 10 <= X <= 100
Test values derived using Standard BVA: 9, 10, 11, 99, 100, 101.
Standard BVA incorporates a robust method for deriving test cases around boundaries by including both valid and invalid test points. This comprehensive scrutiny directly addresses frequent coding errors that developers encounter. The thoroughness of this method minimizes the risk of leaving boundary cases unchecked. Adopting a 3-point strategy omits risks associated with boundary errors, as it does not sample the points right outside valid ranges.
Consider a law which allows speed limits of 30 to 60 mph for highway driving. A thorough investigation would require checking speeds of 29, 30, 31, 59, 60, and 61 mph to ensure that speed enforcement works properly as per regulations. If an officer were only to check 30, 60, and, say, 45, they might incorrectly ticket drivers for simple violations, missing other violations like going too slow or too fast at the critical edges.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
The Combined Strategy (ECT + BVA):
The most effective approach to designing black-box unit tests involves a two-step process:
Step 1: Apply Equivalence Class Testing (ECT): First, meticulously identify all valid and invalid equivalence classes for every input variable of the unit under test. This ensures all broad categories of inputs are covered. For each class, mentally note its boundaries.
Step 2: Apply Boundary Value Analysis (BVA): For every identified equivalence class that represents a range or has distinct boundaries (e.g., numeric ranges, string lengths, quantities), systematically apply the BVA rules (preferably Standard BVA) to select specific test values at, just inside, and just outside these boundaries.
Combine Test Cases for Multiple Inputs:
1. When a unit has multiple input parameters, you generally create test cases by:
- Taking all possible combinations of boundary values for all inputs (this is Strong BVA, leading to potential test explosion if many inputs).
- Or, more practically for complex units, combining a boundary value for one input with "normal" or typical valid values for all other inputs. You then systematically cycle through the boundary values for each input, keeping others "normal." This is often a more manageable approach when full combinatorial testing is not feasible.
In effective software testing, merging ECT and BVA brings out the merits of each approach. Initially, one identifies valid and invalid classes from ECT that segment the input data into functional blocks. Following this, applying BVA targets precise values at the edges of each class to catch boundary-related defects. When working with multiple parameters, it's often more efficient to test combinations of one boundary case with typical values from other parameters, enabling rigorous testing without overwhelming the testing process.
Think about preparing a multi-course meal where you need several ingredients. The first step is to get a complete list of what you need (like ECT), identifying the key items for each course. Next, while scrutinizing the critical ingredients, you also pinpoint those that need to be exact measurements, like spices (like BVA) to ensure flavor integrity. When you prepare, you check one main course ingredient at different stages while keeping other ingredients stable, ensuring everything works together harmoniously.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Boundary Value Analysis: A technique to identify errors occurring at input boundaries.
Edge Cases: Specific scenarios occurring at extreme input limits where defects are likely.
Test Case Design: The process of determining which test cases to implement based on specified input conditions.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
For a valid range [1, 100], test the values 0, 1, 2, 99, 100, and 101 to ensure coverage of boundaries.
When testing a password field requiring 8-15 characters, check lengths of 7, 8, 15, and 16 for boundary assessments.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
When testing boundaries, do take care, check at the edge, and beware!
Imagine a castle wall representing input ranges. You want to check if the guards are vigilant at the gates (boundaries) to prevent sneaky intruders (defects) from getting in.
Remember the '6 points for success': min, min+1, max, max-1, below min, above max!
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Boundary Value Analysis (BVA)
Definition:
A black-box testing technique focusing on the values at and near boundaries of input ranges to identify defects.
Term: Equivalence Class Testing (ECT)
Definition:
A black-box testing technique that divides input data into partitions where each partition is expected to be processed similarly.
Term: Edge Case
Definition:
A problem or situation that occurs only at an extreme limit of a given input range.
Term: OffbyOne Error
Definition:
A logic error that occurs when a loop iterates one time too many or too few, often linked to boundary conditions.
Term: Test Case
Definition:
A document specifying inputs, execution conditions, and expected results for the purpose of evaluating a feature.