Practice Details of In-Charge Engineer - 9.1.3 | 9. Sanction Drawing | Building Planning and Computer- aided Civil Engineering drawing
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What does a Sanction Plan include?

💡 Hint: Think of the components necessary for building approval.

Question 2

Easy

Why is the In-Charge Engineer important?

💡 Hint: Consider their role in overseeing the project.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What essential detail must be included in a Sanction Plan?

  • a) Owner’s address
  • b) In-Charge Engineer’s details
  • c) None of the above

💡 Hint: Consider who is responsible for overseeing the construction.

Question 2

True or False: The Sanctioning Authority only verifies the owner's address.

  • True
  • False

💡 Hint: Think about the broader role of regulatory bodies.

Solve 1 more question and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

A construction team starts work without submitting a Sanction Plan that includes the In-Charge Engineer's details. Outline the potential consequences they may face.

💡 Hint: Consider the legal frameworks governing construction.

Question 2

Design a brief outline of what a Sanction Plan should contain, emphasizing the significance of each section.

💡 Hint: Think critically about how each component contributes to the overall compliance process.

Challenge and get performance evaluation