Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skillsβperfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
Youβve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Lesson
Today, we'll share thoughts on the criticism that the Indian Constitution is unwieldy. Why do you think it might be perceived this way?
I think it's because it's quite long and has a lot of articles.
That's right! However, what distinguishes the Indian Constitution is its comprehensive nature, which seeks to cover vast aspects of governance. Unlike smaller constitutions, it aims to ensure every necessary aspect is captured. So, does a lengthy document always mean it's unwieldy?
Not necessarily! It could mean it's detailed and thorough.
Exactly! Itβs crucial to see it as holistic rather than unwieldy. Remember the acronym 'COVER' β **C**omprehensive, **O**rganized, **V**ersatile, **E**ffective, and **R**epresentative. Let's summarize: while the Constitution's size can seem overwhelming, its depth enhances governance. Any other thoughts?
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Lesson
Now, letβs discuss the claim that the Constitution is unrepresentative. What does that mean, and is it valid?
I think it means that regular people's voices werenβt heard during its creation.
Spot on! Members were primarily from more privileged segments of society. How does that affect the Constitutionβs inclusivity?
It might not address the wants of the less privileged, so it could be biased.
Valid point! Yet, many advocated for marginalized groups. The acronym 'INCLUDE' can help us remember: **I**nclusion, **N**eeds, **C**oncerns, **L**egitimacy, **U**nity, **D**iversity, and **E**mpowerment. In summary, while representation may seem limited, various voices were considered. What do you think?
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Lesson
Lastly, letβs discuss the viewpoint that the Constitution is alien to Indian traditions. What do you think?
I guess itβs because it borrows a lot from Western constitutions.
You're right, but remember, our framers were inspired by multiple sources and not just Western ones. How does this synthesis help our own identity?
It means we can blend modern ideas with our traditions.
Exactly! We can think of this blending as 'CIVIL' β **C**ombining **I**nnovations with **V**alues of **I**ntegration and **L**ocal practices. To conclude, while the Constitution reflects Western elements, its essence is distinctly Indian. Any closing comments?
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The criticisms of the Indian Constitution highlight three main points: its unwieldy nature due to its size and inclusiveness, the lack of broad representation in its design stemming from the composition of the Constituent Assembly, and the perception that it borrows heavily from Western models, making it seem alien to Indian traditions. However, these criticisms do not necessarily undermine the philosophical ideals the Constitution represents.
The Indian Constitution faces several criticisms possibly influenced by differing perspectives on what a constitution should embody. Three significant criticisms stand out:
Overall, despite these criticisms, the limitations posed do not significantly undermine the Constitution's philosophical foundation, as it still projects the vision of a united and democratic India.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
The criticism that it is unwieldy is based on the assumption that the entire constitution of a country must be found in one compact document. But this is not true even of countries such as the US which do have a compact constitution. The fact is that a countryβs constitution is to be identified with a compact document and with other written documents with constitutional status. Thus, it is possible to find important constitutional statements and practices outside one compact document. In the case of India, many such details, practices and statements are included in one single document and this has made that document somewhat large in size. Many countries for instance, do not have provisions for election commission or the civil service commission in the document known as constitution. But in India, many such matters are attended to by the Constitutional document itself.
This chunk discusses the criticism that the Indian Constitution is too large or unwieldy. It argues against the notion that a good constitution must be compact. Instead, it explains that constitutions can be found in various documents, and having many provisions in one document, as done in India, is not necessarily a flaw but a source of clarity about governance. The emphasis here is on the inclusion of various components of governance in a single definitive document.
Think of a cookbook versus a recipe card. A cookbook might look bulky but contains all the recipes in one place, making it easy to find everything you need. A recipe card might look neat but can leave out vital details or instructions, requiring you to search multiple sources.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
A second criticism of the Constitution is that it is unrepresentative. Do you remember how the Constituent Assembly was formed? At that time, adult franchise was not yet granted and most members came from the advanced sections of the society. Does this make our Constitution unrepresentative? Here we must distinguish two components of representation, one that might be called voice and the other opinion. The voice component of representation is important. People must be recognised in their own language or voice, not in the language of the masters.
This chunk explains the criticism that the Indian Constitution is unrepresentative because the members of its Constituent Assembly were not chosen through universal suffrage. Most came from privileged backgrounds. It emphasizes the difference between having a 'voice' (being heard and recognized in one's own right) and having 'opinion' (representing a range of views). The argument suggests that while the Assembly might have been seen as lacking a 'voice', it did encompass various opinions on governance, reflecting broader societal issues.
Consider a school council made up primarily of students from a single grade. They might represent the opinions of their peers, but if they only advocate for their own interests, they fail to give a voice to students from other grades. Just like students from different grades need to be heard for a balanced council, diverse backgrounds in a legislative assembly are crucial for true representation.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
A final criticism alleges that the Indian Constitution is entirely an alien document, borrowed article by article from western constitutions and sits uneasily with the cultural ethos of the Indian people. This criticism is often voiced by many. Even in the Constituent Assembly itself, there were some voices that echo this concern.
This chunk discusses the perspective that the Indian Constitution is seen as foreign, having borrowed heavily from Western models, which some argue disconnects it from the Indian cultural context. It recounts that even during the Constitution's framing, some found it difficult to reconcile the new governance structures with traditional Indian values and practices. However, the text also suggests that such borrowing was not blindly done and contained elements that suited Indiaβs unique socio-cultural landscape.
Think about how people adopt fashion trends. If someone takes inspiration from a foreign style but modifies it to suit their body type and personal taste, theyβre still being true to themselves while also embracing something new. Similarly, the Constitution may have been influenced by western norms but was tailored to fit Indiaβs identity.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
All this is not to say that the Constitution of India is a perfect and flawless document. Given the social conditions within which the Constitution was made, it was only natural that there may be many controversial matters, that there would be many areas that needed careful revision. There are many features of this Constitution that have emerged mainly due to the exigencies of the time. Nonetheless, we must admit that there are many limitations to this Constitution. Let us briefly mention the limitations of the Constitution.
In this chunk, the limitations of the Indian Constitution are acknowledged. It highlights that while the Constitution was a groundbreaking document at its inception, it cannot be deemed perfect but rather a response to the needs of its time. It notes that certain areas, like gender justice and socio-economic rights, might not have been fully addressed from the start, reflecting a need for evolution as society progresses.
Consider a smartphone that was revolutionary when first released but lacks some modern functionalities that users now expect. While it served its purpose for its time, it shows that constant updates and revisions are necessary to keep up with ever-changing user needs and societal expectations.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Unwieldiness: Refers to the complex and large nature of the Constitution, which can make it seem cumbersome but is also comprehensive.
Representativeness: Discusses whether all sections of society were adequately represented in the formation of the Constitution.
Alienation: The critique that the Constitution is foreign or incompatible with Indian traditions.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
The Indian Constitution is long and detailed, including not just fundamental rights but also provisions for the election commission, whereas other countries may keep such details separate.
Many members of the Constituent Assembly advocated for rights of marginalized groups, indicating a level of representation despite their privileged status.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
Constitution so long, sometimes feels wrong, yet covers all rights, keeping us strong.
Imagine a library filled with ancient texts. The larger the library, the more knowledge it holds, despite being overwhelming at times.
RAVEN for Critiques: Representation, Alienation, Volume, Effectiveness, Need for Inclusiveness.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Unwieldiness
Definition:
The state of being large or complex and therefore difficult to manage or handle.
Term: Representativeness
Definition:
The degree to which the members of certain groups are represented in political discussions or frameworks.
Term: Alienation
Definition:
The state of being isolated or estranged, often used to describe feelings of disconnection from oneβs culture or political system.