Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Today we'll explore two significant approaches in community development initiatives: the product-centric approach, which is mainly NGO-driven, and the people-centric approach that focuses on collaboration with communities. Can anyone tell me why collaboration might be important?
I think collaboration can help ensure that the needs of the community are met more effectively.
That's a great point! Collaboration does indeed ensure community needs are prioritized. We'll use an acronym to remember the benefits of collaboration: CARE - Community, Aid, Respect, Empowerment. Remembering this will help you recall the critical aspects of a people-centric approach.
Could you explain how financing fits into these approaches?
Sure! Financing can come from NGOs or be owner-driven, meaning the community contributes their own resources. This can create a sense of ownership which is vital in rebuilding efforts.
Now, let's look at the case of Gujarat, where post-disaster interventions provided significant financial aid. Do you remember the amount given per family for household kits?
I believe it was Rs.1250 per family?
Exactly! Understanding these figures helps us appreciate the scale of the intervention. In addition, money was allocated for cattle losses based on type, like Rs.150 for goats. Why do you think it's important to consider livestock loss in disaster recovery?
Because some communities rely heavily on livestock for their livelihood.
That’s right! This highlights how tailored approaches in recovery can support various community needs.
Let's discuss the reconstruction figures from Gujarat. 40,000 houses were completed by NGOs, while most owner-driven constructions were in-situ. What do you think this means?
It seems like most people rebuilt where their homes were instead of relocating.
Exactly! In-situ reconstruction often allows for stronger community ties. Can anyone recall the satisfaction rates from the Abhiyan survey?
Owner-driven projects had a 91% satisfaction rate, right?
Correct! This indicates that people tend to be more satisfied when they have control over their reconstruction efforts.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The section elaborates on the collaboration involved in people-centric approaches as compared to product-centric ones. It highlights the significance of both strategies in disaster recovery, with a specific focus on the housing reconstruction efforts in Gujarat.
In this section, the differences between product-centric and people-centric approaches are explored, particularly in the context of post-disaster recovery efforts. A product-centric approach is characterized by being primarily NGO-driven, while a people-centric approach emphasizes collaboration between communities and NGOs. The chapter outlines three models of reconstruction, with a notable focus on the case of Gujarat, where substantial financial aid was provided for post-disaster housing reconstruction. Key statistics illustrate the scale of destruction and the performance of different reconstruction strategies, with 82% of housing needs reported as complete by 2003. This section emphasizes the importance of community involvement in reconstruction efforts, noting satisfaction rates between different approaches and how ownership-driven reconstruction played a key role in achieving housing targets.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
They can also contribute their money, this is we called owner-driven and also there is the kind of NGO or contractor driven approach that can be 2 types; one is product-centric approach and people-centric approach. This product-centric approach where it is done by the NGO itself, it is mainly NGO driven or agency driven. People's-centric approach is more like a collaboration of partnership between people and the private agencies or NGO’s.
The people-centric approach emphasizes collaboration among community members and organizations like NGOs. In this model, individuals can invest their resources, making it 'owner-driven.' On the other hand, the product-centric approach is led by NGOs, focusing on providing specific products or services without strong local community involvement.
Imagine a community garden. In an owner-driven model, local residents pool their money and resources to create and maintain the garden together. In contrast, a product-centric approach might involve a gardening NGO providing plants and tools to the community, but without engaging them in the gardening process.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, we have total 3 categories of models; 1, 2 and 3. So we can see clearly here also that there is one package from package number 2, there is owner-driven. And from package number 1, there are 2 that are NGO driven and community NGO partnership approach.
There are three categories of models used for reconstruction. These include an owner-driven model, where people control the process, and two forms of NGO-driven models: one solely managed by NGOs and another that requires partnership with the community. Each model offers different benefits depending on the context and needs of the affected individuals.
Think of these models like different ways to hold a community meeting. An owner-driven model may be everyone getting together to decide what to discuss and how to organize the meeting. The NGO-driven model could be like someone coming in planning the agenda without consulting the community, while the partnership model involves a facilitator who asks for community input while still guiding the process.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
What they have done in Gujarat; post-disaster interventions, they Rs.1 lakh was made to the next of kin of each of the deceased person, Rs.1250 rupees per family was given as the household kits was to provided.
After disasters, specific financial assistance was provided to support affected families. Each family who lost a member received 1 lakh rupees, while 1,250 rupees were allocated for household kits, ensuring families had resources to begin rebuilding their lives.
Imagine a neighborhood hit by a storm. To help families recover, aid organizations might offer checks to families who lost loved ones and provide them with starter kits containing basic necessities like food, cleaning supplies, and clothing to help them restart their daily life.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Shelter reconstruction; some of the reports here; now, progress of housing reconstructions in Kutch, number of total destroyed houses was 1 lakh 56,000 little more than that in Kutch area, and that was planned by the NGO was around 50,000 among them, the under-construction house right now that time 2003 was little more than 6000, completed almost 40,000 thousand little less than that.
In Kutch, a significant number of houses (over 156,000) were destroyed in a disaster, with plans from NGOs to construct around 50,000 homes. As of 2003, over 6,000 homes were still under construction while approximately 40,000 homes had been completed, demonstrating active efforts toward re-establishing shelter for affected families.
Picture a school building that collapsed. The local community and NGOs come together to rebuild it. Initially, they plan to build 500 rooms, and while many are still being constructed, they have successfully finished 300 of them, showing progress in restoring an important community resource.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
What was the level of satisfaction according to the Abhiyan 2003 survey, an NGO called Abhiyan that NGO 80% people that those buildings were constructed by NGO 80% are satisfied and in case of owner-driven, 91% were satisfied.
According to a survey conducted in 2003, 80% of individuals living in NGO-constructed homes reported satisfaction with their housing, while owner-driven constructions had an even higher satisfaction rate of 91%. This indicates that when communities have a hand in their reconstruction, there tends to be a higher level of contentment.
Think about someone getting a custom-made phone case versus a pre-made one. The person who designed their case to their tastes is likely to be much happier with their purchase, just as families are more satisfied with homes they helped to build.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Study area; we conducted surveys in 3 areas, I would like to show in different approaches and models and their case studies. One is NGO agency driven approach in Hajapar...
In Hajapar, various community dynamics were surveyed, revealing the segmentation among different social groups. This segmentation influences how reconstruction efforts are received and implemented, highlighting the importance of understanding community structures in disaster recovery.
Imagine a diverse classroom where students come from different backgrounds. If a teacher wants to help them learn, they need to understand each student's unique experiences and challenges. Similarly, in Hajapar, understanding community segments allows NGOs to tailor their approaches for effective recovery.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Collaboration: Essential for understanding community needs and fostering empowerment.
Reconstruction Models: Different approaches to housing reconstruction can impact satisfaction and effectiveness.
Community Ownership: Increases satisfaction and investment in recovery efforts.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
In Gujarat, the owner-driven approach saw a completion of approximately 96,000 houses, emphasizing community engagement in rebuilding.
Post-disaster financial aid included specific compensation for livestock losses, addressing the diverse needs of affected families.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
For homes to grow, we must all know – together we can make it flow.
Imagine a village where each family rebuilds their homes together, strengthening bonds and happiness—a true community effort.
R.E.C. for Reconstruction: Rebuild, Engage, Collaborate.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: ProductCentric Approach
Definition:
An NGO-driven strategy focusing on delivering predefined products or services without significant community input.
Term: PeopleCentric Approach
Definition:
A community-driven strategy that emphasizes collaboration between NGOs and local organizations to meet the unique needs of the population.
Term: OwnerDriven Reconstruction
Definition:
A housing reconstruction approach where the affected individuals or communities take the lead on rebuilding their homes.
Term: InSitu Reconstruction
Definition:
Building or reconstructing homes on the original site rather than relocating them elsewhere.