2.2 - Self-Construction Overview
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Interactive Audio Lesson
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Understanding Reconstruction Models
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
Today we will explore various models of housing reconstruction post-disaster. First, can anyone tell me the two main approaches to reconstruction?
Isn't there the owner-driven approach and the NGO-driven approach?
Excellent! The owner-driven approach means that communities directly manage and invest in their housing. What about the NGO-driven model?
I think the NGO-driven model can be either product-centric or people-centric, right?
Correct! The product-centric model is led by the NGO, while the people-centric model collaborates with the community. Let's remember this with the acronym P-C-P: Product-Centric, People-Centric. Can anyone give me an example of a scenario using these approaches?
I think during the Gujarat case, there were different financial aids provided to families affected.
Exactly! The case study represents the integration of these models with real financial aid during a disaster. Great job!
Analyzing the Gujarat Case Study
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
Let’s take a closer look at the Gujarat case study. Who recalls what specific financial assistance was provided after the disaster?
There was Rs. 1 lakh given to the family of deceased persons and others received household kits!
Good memory! This assistance was crucial for household recovery. What do you think about the compensation provided for livestock losses?
Different amounts were given based on the animal. Like Rs. 2,500 for a cow!
Yes! This acknowledges the importance of livestock in the community's economy. Now, can someone tell me about the number of houses destroyed versus those reconstructed?
Over 156,000 houses were destroyed, and about 135,000 were planned to be rebuilt, right?
Correct! And students, it’s crucial to note the high proportion of self-construction in the reconstruction models. This reflects the capacity and willingness of communities to rebuild. Excellent discussion!
Satisfaction Levels Among Beneficiaries
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
Moving on to the satisfaction levels among beneficiaries, who can share insights from the Abhiyan survey results?
It shows that 91% of people in owner-driven houses were satisfied, which is higher than the 80% for NGO houses.
Exactly! This highlights the impact of ownership on satisfaction. Why do you think owner-driven constructions result in higher satisfaction levels?
Because people are directly involved in the building process, it's more personalized to their needs!
Well said! This leads us to reflect on how projects should be designed going forward. Lastly, can someone summarize what factors influenced community satisfaction?
Right! It included financial aid, personal involvement in construction, and the overall quality of the houses built.
Perfect summary. Remember, understanding beneficiary perspectives can drive better recovery interventions in future projects.
Introduction & Overview
Read summaries of the section's main ideas at different levels of detail.
Quick Overview
Standard
The section elaborates on different reconstruction approaches in post-disaster contexts, focusing on owner-driven self-construction versus NGO or contractor-driven models. It presents case studies from Gujarat and offers insights into the satisfaction levels of beneficiaries and the effectiveness of various models in housing reconstruction.
Detailed
Self-Construction Overview
The section presents an analysis of housing reconstruction methods following disasters, with a focus on self-construction approaches. It categorizes these methods into three main models: owner-driven, NGO-driven, and community partnerships.
Key Points:
- Approach Types: Self-construction includes owner-driven initiatives and two subcategories of NGO-driven approaches: product-centric and people-centric. The former is managed by NGOs directly while the latter requires collaboration between communities and NGOs.
- Case Study: The reconstruction efforts post-disaster in Gujarat are highlighted, including financial aids like Rs. 1 lakh for deceased kin and household kits provided to families. Specific compensation amounts were allocated for livestock losses.
- Housing Reconstruction Statistics: The section provides substantial data, stating approximately 156,000 houses were destroyed, aiming for 135,000 reconstructive efforts, of which 96,000 were self-constructed.
- It emphasizes the high repetition of in-situ development in owner-driven projects.
- Beneficiary Satisfaction: Favorable satisfaction levels were reported via the Abhiyan survey, with 91% satisfaction in owner-driven models versus 80% for NGO-driven housing.
- Community Profiling: Detailed contextual profiles of communities affected in the case study reveal demographic and infrastructural considerations influencing reconstruction strategies.
Audio Book
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Types of Construction Approaches
Chapter 1 of 6
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
They can also contribute their money, this is we called owner-driven and also there is the kind of NGO or contractor driven approach that can be 2 types; one is product-centric approach and people-centric approach.
Detailed Explanation
The section begins by introducing two main construction approaches: Owner-driven and NGO-driven. Owner-driven means that individuals contribute their money to construct their homes, giving them control over the construction process. In contrast, NGO-driven approaches can be categorized into two types: 'product-centric', where the NGO exclusively manages the construction, and 'people-centric', where there is collaboration between the community and private agencies or NGOs.
Examples & Analogies
Imagine if you wanted to build a new toy. You could either buy the parts and build it yourself (owner-driven), or you could ask a toy maker to build it for you (NGO-driven). In the NGO-driven model, you might work together with the toy maker to create a customized toy that meets your needs.
Models of Reconstruction
Chapter 2 of 6
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
So, we have total 3 categories of models; 1, 2 and 3. So we can see clearly here also that there is one package from package number 2, there is owner-driven. And from package number 1, there are 2 that are NGO driven and community NGO partnership approach.
Detailed Explanation
There are three categories of reconstruction models identified in this approach. Models categorized as number 1 and 2 reflect different NGO-driven approaches, focusing on either delivering products or collaborating with communities. Model number 3 is owner-driven, where individuals engage directly in the construction or repair of their homes through their own financial contributions.
Examples & Analogies
Think of these models like educational programs. Some schools teach through textbooks and teachers (NGO-driven), while others may empower students to take charge of their own learning through projects and presentations (owner-driven). Each model has its strengths and focuses.
Post-Disaster Interventions in Gujarat
Chapter 3 of 6
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
What they have done in Gujarat; post-disaster interventions, they Rs.1 lakh was made to the next of kin of each of the deceased person, Rs.1250 rupees per family was given as the household kits...
Detailed Explanation
In Gujarat, post-disaster interventions included financial assistance for families affected by disasters. For every deceased person, families received Rs. 1 lakh, and Rs. 1250 was provided per family for essential household kits. Additional compensation was given for livestock losses, highlighting a comprehensive approach to support families in rebuilding their lives.
Examples & Analogies
Imagine a community hit by a storm where residents lose not just properties but also loved ones. The government steps in with financial aid to help families cope with those losses. It’s similar to how support works in organizations, offering assistance to get back on your feet after tough times.
Housing Reconstruction Statistics
Chapter 4 of 6
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
Shelter reconstruction; some of the reports here; now, progress of housing reconstructions in Kutch...
Detailed Explanation
The reconstruction efforts in Kutch post-disaster involved 156,000 houses that were destroyed. The NGO initiative aimed to reconstruct around 50,000 houses, and by 2003, over 40,000 were completed. Approximately 96,000 houses were constructed through owner-driven initiatives, resulting in a total of 135,000 houses. Most of the owner-driven constructions were 'in-situ', meaning they were built where the original homes were located.
Examples & Analogies
This is like a neighborhood after a flood, where some families choose to rebuild their homes on their original plots, while others might rely on a charity to help rebuild across town. The statistics show how communities can significantly rely on both models for rebuilding.
Satisfaction Levels and Usage of Houses
Chapter 5 of 6
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
What was the level of satisfaction according to the Abhiyan 2003 survey...
Detailed Explanation
A survey conducted in 2003 found that 91% of owners who built their houses were satisfied, compared to 80% satisfaction among those with NGO-built houses. This indicates a higher confidence and satisfaction level among those who participated directly in their construction. The survey also showed significant usage of newly constructed houses, with only about 20% of the NGO-built houses not being fully utilized.
Examples & Analogies
Think of it this way: if you built a treehouse yourself, you’re more likely to love and take care of it compared to if you just bought one. This reflects how personal involvement in the building process can lead to greater satisfaction and use of the result.
Community Characteristics: A Case Study
Chapter 6 of 6
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
Study area; we conducted surveys in 3 areas, I would like to show in different approaches and models and their case studies...
Detailed Explanation
The study focused on three areas to analyze how different rebuilding approaches affected communities. For instance, in Hajapar, a community's characteristics were surveyed, showing its population size, literacy level, and occupation. This community experienced significant loss, including its primary school and health facilities post-disaster.
Examples & Analogies
It’s like we are looking at different schools after a natural disaster to see how each of them is recovering. Each school has unique characteristics, challenges, and ways of adapting, just like any community or family faced with rebuilding after a crisis.
Key Concepts
-
Owner-driven vs. NGO-driven: Two primary approaches to post-disaster housing reconstruction.
-
Self-construction: Emphasizes local community involvement in rebuilding.
-
In-situ vs. relocated housing: Key considerations in housing reconstruction strategies.
-
Beneficiary satisfaction: Critical metric for determining the success of housing interventions.
Examples & Applications
In Gujarat's post-disaster recovery, Rs. 1 lakh was allocated for families who lost loved ones, demonstrating direct financial aid.
The survey results reflected that 91% of self-constructed homes yielded higher satisfaction compared to 80% for NGO-built houses.
Memory Aids
Interactive tools to help you remember key concepts
Rhymes
Post-disaster, aid provides, Owner-driven is where pride resides.
Stories
In a village struck by a disaster, the people decided they would rebuild. They pooled their money and resources, creating houses where their old ones once stood—this is the essence of owner-driven reconstruction.
Memory Tools
P-C-P: Remember Product-Centric and People-Centric for NGO reconstruction types.
Acronyms
SOS for Satisfaction
Owner-led projects yield Satisfaction Over Surveys.
Flash Cards
Glossary
- Ownerdriven Approach
A housing reconstruction model where individuals directly manage and contribute to the rebuilding of their homes.
- NGOdriven Approach
A recovery method facilitated by Non-Governmental Organizations, which can be product-centric or people-centric.
- Productcentric Model
An NGO-driven approach that emphasizes the delivery of specific products or services.
- Peoplecentric Model
Collaborative reconstruction efforts involving community participation alongside NGO support.
- Insitu Development
Reconstruction efforts that occur on the original site of the destroyed homes.
- PublicPrivate Partnership
Collaborative agreements between government agencies and private sector companies to deliver public services or infrastructure.
Reference links
Supplementary resources to enhance your learning experience.