2.2. Self-Construction Overview

They can also contribute their money, this is we called owner-driven and also there is the kind of NGO or contractor driven approach that can be 2 types; one is product-centric approach and people-centric approach.

The section begins by introducing two main construction approaches: Owner-driven and NGO-driven. Owner-driven means that individuals contribute their money to construct their homes, giving them control over the construction process. In contrast, NGO-driven approaches can be categorized into two types: 'product-centric', where the NGO exclusively manages the construction, and 'people-centric', where there is collaboration between the community and private agencies or NGOs.

Imagine if you wanted to build a new toy. You could either buy the parts and build it yourself (owner-driven), or you could ask a toy maker to build it for you (NGO-driven). In the NGO-driven model, you might work together with the toy maker to create a customized toy that meets your needs.

So, we have total 3 categories of models; 1, 2 and 3. So we can see clearly here also that there is one package from package number 2, there is owner-driven. And from package number 1, there are 2 that are NGO driven and community NGO partnership approach.

There are three categories of reconstruction models identified in this approach. Models categorized as number 1 and 2 reflect different NGO-driven approaches, focusing on either delivering products or collaborating with communities. Model number 3 is owner-driven, where individuals engage directly in the construction or repair of their homes through their own financial contributions.

Think of these models like educational programs. Some schools teach through textbooks and teachers (NGO-driven), while others may empower students to take charge of their own learning through projects and presentations (owner-driven). Each model has its strengths and focuses.

What they have done in Gujarat; post-disaster interventions, they Rs.1 lakh was made to the next of kin of each of the deceased person, Rs.1250 rupees per family was given as the household kits...

In Gujarat, post-disaster interventions included financial assistance for families affected by disasters. For every deceased person, families received Rs. 1 lakh, and Rs. 1250 was provided per family for essential household kits. Additional compensation was given for livestock losses, highlighting a comprehensive approach to support families in rebuilding their lives.

Imagine a community hit by a storm where residents lose not just properties but also loved ones. The government steps in with financial aid to help families cope with those losses. It’s similar to how support works in organizations, offering assistance to get back on your feet after tough times.

Shelter reconstruction; some of the reports here; now, progress of housing reconstructions in Kutch...

The reconstruction efforts in Kutch post-disaster involved 156,000 houses that were destroyed. The NGO initiative aimed to reconstruct around 50,000 houses, and by 2003, over 40,000 were completed. Approximately 96,000 houses were constructed through owner-driven initiatives, resulting in a total of 135,000 houses. Most of the owner-driven constructions were 'in-situ', meaning they were built where the original homes were located.

This is like a neighborhood after a flood, where some families choose to rebuild their homes on their original plots, while others might rely on a charity to help rebuild across town. The statistics show how communities can significantly rely on both models for rebuilding.

What was the level of satisfaction according to the Abhiyan 2003 survey...

A survey conducted in 2003 found that 91% of owners who built their houses were satisfied, compared to 80% satisfaction among those with NGO-built houses. This indicates a higher confidence and satisfaction level among those who participated directly in their construction. The survey also showed significant usage of newly constructed houses, with only about 20% of the NGO-built houses not being fully utilized.

Think of it this way: if you built a treehouse yourself, you’re more likely to love and take care of it compared to if you just bought one. This reflects how personal involvement in the building process can lead to greater satisfaction and use of the result.

Study area; we conducted surveys in 3 areas, I would like to show in different approaches and models and their case studies...

The study focused on three areas to analyze how different rebuilding approaches affected communities. For instance, in Hajapar, a community's characteristics were surveyed, showing its population size, literacy level, and occupation. This community experienced significant loss, including its primary school and health facilities post-disaster.

It’s like we are looking at different schools after a natural disaster to see how each of them is recovering. Each school has unique characteristics, challenges, and ways of adapting, just like any community or family faced with rebuilding after a crisis.

--