Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Today, we're discussing the Global Alliance of Disaster Research Institutes, also known as GADRI. It's a network aimed at sharing knowledge among experts in disaster recovery. Can anyone tell me why this platform is essential?
It helps bring researchers together to share their findings and improve policies!
And it probably connects different theories with practical applications too!
Exactly! By uniting various institutes, GADRI promotes more effective disaster risk management practices. To remember this, think of GADRI as a bridge connecting theory to practice in disaster research. Now, how can this collaboration enhance communication around risks?
It allows for sharing different perspectives and strategies for managing those risks!
Great points, everyone! Understanding diverse viewpoints fosters collaboration and improves DRR strategies overall.
Let's discuss the concept of the social dimension of risk. How can our backgrounds shape the way we perceive hazards?
People from different cultures might view the same hazard differently based on their experiences.
Exactly! This leads us to understand that a hazard might be considered a risk only in specific contexts. To illustrate, remember the formula H*V=R, where H is hazard, V is vulnerability, and R is risk. Can anyone explain that relationship?
If a community is vulnerable, even a small hazard can lead to a significant risk!
Exactly! This helps us realize the importance of addressing social vulnerabilities in disaster management. Moving on, why is local knowledge crucial in this context?
It can provide insights that scientific data might miss, especially about how communities have historically dealt with risks.
Thank you! Local knowledge is invaluable, and it’s essential we integrate it into our practices.
Effective communication is vital for DRR. What strategies can help improve our communication around risks?
Using clear language and examples can help people understand their risks better.
Exactly! We need to communicate in ways that resonate with different cultural perspectives. Also, how might stakeholder engagement play a role?
Engaging a variety of stakeholders ensures that we include different viewpoints and needs.
Right! By collaborating with stakeholders, we build a shared understanding of risks, which is vital for effective management. Let's summarize our key points: GADRI fosters collaboration, local knowledge is essential, and communication must be inclusive.
In our discussions, we've touched on acceptable and unacceptable risks. How do we recognize that something accepted by one culture might not be acceptable to another?
Cultural differences can lead to varying definitions of what risk is 'acceptable' based on their values and experiences.
Correct! Understanding this helps integrate cross-cultural perspectives into DRR strategies. How does this relate to our local knowledge discussions?
Local knowledge encompasses cultural views on risks, influencing how communities respond to them!
Fantastic insight! Remember, integrating local and cultural perspectives helps us craft more inclusive disaster management policies.
How important do you think it is to educate young people about disaster risks from an early age?
It's essential! Teaching them prepares communities better for future disasters.
And they can pass those lessons to their families, strengthening community awareness!
Absolutely! Introducing these concepts early helps foster a culture of preparedness. Let's recall the main takeaway: Educating young people equips them to handle future risks more effectively. Well done, everyone!
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The key topics discussed at the GADRI summit focused on the social dimensions of risk, health, and disaster risk management and included identifying the role of social constructs in understanding risk and enhancing disaster risk reduction strategies. The discussions highlighted the importance of diverse stakeholder engagement and the contribution of local knowledge systems.
The section discusses outcomes from the Fourth Global Summit of the Global Alliance of Disaster Research Institutes (GADRI), hosted in Kyoto. Prof. Ram Sateesh Pasupuleti emphasizes two core themes: the social dimension of risk and health, and the role of disaster risk management (DRM).
The discussion leads to the conclusion that improved understanding of risk, driven by collaborative research and stakeholder engagement, is essential for effective disaster risk reduction.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
In fact, when we talk about the GADRI, first of all this has become a platform for all the academic institutes who are doing the research and disaster recovery and disaster related research, so it is a platform for all these institutes to come together and share the knowledge and inform the policy practice and also the theory. So, in that way this is one of the important platform.
The Global Alliance of Disaster Research Institutes (GADRI) serves as a collaborative platform for academic institutions focused on disaster recovery and risk management research. It facilitates knowledge sharing among institutes, helping to inform policy and shape research practices in the field. This creates a rich environment for researchers to exchange valuable insights and best practices, fostering advancements in disaster risk reduction (DRR).
Imagine a community garden where different people bring their own plants and gardening techniques. Each gardener shares their knowledge about what grows well in their area, and in return, they learn from each other. Similarly, GADRI allows institutions to cultivate their understanding of disaster management by sharing diverse research and practices.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
The purpose and objectives of this session were to identify how research on social construction of risks can be used for effective DRR. To consider how the understanding of risk can be better circulated and discussed among stakeholders to reach a shared recognition of the social dimension of risk. To work out how the understanding risk can help to design the countermeasures of DRR. To reflect and report on future research directions relating to the social dimension of disaster risk.
The discussion on the social dimension of risk aimed to explore how social perspectives on risk influence disaster recovery strategies. The goals included examining how risks are socially constructed and how these constructions can inform effective DRR practices. Participants sought to enhance communication about risks among various stakeholders, fostering a better mutual understanding. Additionally, discussions aimed at determining future research trajectories to deepen the understanding of social factors in disaster risk.
Consider a community forum where residents discuss local flooding issues. By sharing their personal experiences and perspectives, they identify that certain factors—like poor infrastructure or economic disparity—play substantial roles in the risks they face. Such discussions can lead to targeted community action plans that address these social dimensions, similar to how this session aims to address social aspects in disaster risk.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, when we say context of risk itself has a different meaning especially the people living on the edge. Edge here I am not responding that people living on the mountainous edge but I am talking about the more vulnerable conditions who are prone to these disaster risk. Disaster is not just a natural context, but it is the social vulnerability, how it puts them into the risk.
The 'context of risk' refers to the various vulnerabilities faced by people, particularly those in disadvantaged situations. Rather than viewing disasters solely as natural events, this perspective emphasizes the socio-economic factors that increase a community's susceptibility. For instance, populations living in poverty may lack access to resources that would help them prepare for or recover from disasters, therefore, their social vulnerabilities significantly shape their risk experience.
Imagine two villages in a flood-prone area: one is affluent with strong infrastructure and emergency services, while the other is impoverished with limited support. Both villages face the same flood threat, but the outcomes differ widely because of their social contexts. This highlights how socio-economic factors critically influence disaster risk, just like the different circumstances of people living on the 'edge' of society.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
When we talk about knowledge, how local knowledge understand risk because the scientific knowledge understands in a different way but how the local knowledge have perceived the risk, how they understand the risk. You know this is very important because the scientific community always undermines the local knowledge.
This section highlights the significance of both scientific and local knowledge in understanding disaster risks. While scientific data provides critical insights, local knowledge—rooted in community experiences—offers practical understanding that often reflects cultural sensitivities and lived experiences. The challenge lies in integrating these two types of knowledge, as scientific communities frequently underestimate the value of local wisdom.
Think of a small coastal town that has weathered storms for generations. The locals have developed their own strategies to prepare for hurricanes based on their experiences, such as knowing which trees to remove or the best evacuation routes. If emergency management merely relies on scientific models without considering these local practices, they may overlook effective strategies for risk reduction.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Collaboration among research institutes leads to improved disaster management strategies.
Understanding the social construction of risks is crucial for effective DRM.
Local knowledge enhances vulnerability reduction and disaster preparedness.
Cultural perspectives shape what is considered acceptable risk.
Embedding DRR education in schools creates a culture of preparedness.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
When comparing earthquake responses, communities with local preparations and knowledge can mitigate impacts better than those without.
教育 integrates DRR concepts helps young minds learn about safety and resilience early on.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
When disaster strikes, don't you fret, knowledge is the best bet.
Once in a village, locals used their wisdom about floods to build barriers, saving many from disaster. Their story illustrates how local knowledge can mitigate risks.
Remember 'RISK' to recall: Resources, Information, Social context, Knowledge.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: GADRI
Definition:
Global Alliance of Disaster Research Institutes, a platform for collaboration among disaster research institutions.
Term: Disaster Risk Management (DRM)
Definition:
Processes for identifying, assessing, and reducing risks related to disasters.
Term: Social Construction of Risks
Definition:
Influence of societal norms and cultural practices on perceptions and approaches to risks.
Term: Local Knowledge
Definition:
Understanding and wisdom derived from community experiences regarding risks and hazards.
Term: Vulnerability
Definition:
The susceptibility of individuals or communities to harm, often influenced by social factors.
Term: Acceptable Risk
Definition:
A level of risk that is deemed tolerable or manageable based on cultural or contextual factors.