Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Today, we are going to explore how societies construct their understanding of risks. Can anyone summarize the concept of social construction of risks?
I think it means that different communities view risks differently based on their circumstances.
Exactly! That's why risk can be seen as a social construct. It varies by community, influenced by their history and resources. Let’s remember this with the acronym RISK: 'Recognizing Individual and Society's Knowledge.'
So, it’s about how individuals within a community perceive and share their experiences regarding risks?
Correct! The shared perceptions help shape how communities prepare for and respond to disasters. Any questions about this idea?
Can we say that communities with more resources are better at managing risks?
Absolutely, resource distribution affects vulnerability. Let’s conclude this session: communities view risk based on different social constructions influenced by their resources.
Now, let’s dive into how local knowledge plays a vital role in understanding risks. Can some of you provide examples of local knowledge affecting risk perception?
In my village, elders tell stories about past floods, which shapes how we prepare for rainstorms.
Fantastic example! Local narratives can help communities prepare effectively. Remember the mnemonic 'Knowledge Is Local' to remind us of this.
But isn’t there a risk when scientific knowledge overlooks this local understanding?
Good point! The tension between scientific and local knowledge can lead to ineffective solutions. Integrating both perspectives enhances DRR. Any thoughts?
We could have workshops that bring scientists and locals together to share insights.
Exactly! Collaboration can build better preparedness. To summarize, local knowledge is crucial in shaping risk understanding and should be integrated into DRR strategies.
Let's discuss how culture shapes our perceptions of risks. Why do you think risk acceptance varies across cultures?
Perhaps it’s because different cultures have different histories with disasters?
Exactly! Cultural backgrounds inform what communities accept as reasonable risk. Let’s summarize with the acronym 'CULTURE': 'Community Understands Loss Through Unique Risk Experiences.'
So, what’s acceptable for one culture might be unacceptable for another due to their unique experiences?
Exactly! Understanding these differences is key to effective communication and planning. Any questions on cultural perceptions?
How can we address these differences in disaster planning?
Great question! Community engagement and education tailored to cultural contexts are essential. In conclusion, cultural perspectives greatly influence risk acceptance and must be considered in DRR.
Finally, let’s cover how DRR can be integrated into education. Why is it important to start education on DRR at a young age?
It helps create a culture of preparedness early on.
Exactly! The concept 'EARLY' can be your guide: 'Empowering All to Respond and Learn Yonder.' Would you all agree?
Yes! Early education can build resilience through informed communities.
Correct! Any thoughts on what subjects could include DRR?
Science and social studies could integrate risk management topics.
Great suggestions! In summary, integrating DRR into school curriculums prepares future generations for risk management.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The discussions held during the fourth GADRI summit emphasized the importance of understanding the social dimensions of risk and health in disaster risk management. It highlighted the different perceptions of risk, the role of local knowledge, and the importance of developing effective countermeasures to enhance disaster risk reduction (DRR).
The GADRI (Global Alliance of Disaster Research Institutes) summit, held from March 13 to March 15 at Kyoto University, provided an essential platform for exchanging knowledge and enhancing disaster risk reduction practices. The session on the social dimension of risk and health and DRM explored critical topics including:
Throughout the discussions, participants were encouraged to consider how varying cultural backgrounds shape perceptions of acceptable and unacceptable risks.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Welcome to the course disaster recovery and build back better. Today, we are going to discuss some of the summary of the discussions which happened in the GADRI, Global Alliance of Disaster Research Institutes, the fourth summit which just recently happened in Kyoto University in Japan.
In this introduction, the speaker sets the stage for discussing disaster recovery and the importance of understanding social dimensions of risks in health and disaster risk management (DRM). The GADRI summit is highlighted as a platform for researchers to share knowledge and influence policy, signifying the collaborative effort in addressing disaster and recovery.
Think of the GADRI summit like a large family reunion where different branches of the family come together to share their experiences and learn from each other about how to overcome challenges. Just like in a family, sharing knowledge can lead to stronger strategies for future resilience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
The purpose and objectives of this session were to identify how research on the social construction of risks can be used for effective DRR. To consider how the understanding of risk can be better circulated and discussed among stakeholders to reach a shared recognition of the social dimension of risk.
This section identifies the goals of the discussion group at the summit. It aims to explore how the social aspects of risks can inform disaster risk reduction (DRR) practices. The emphasis on communication among stakeholders underscores the need for collaborative understanding in managing disaster risks effectively.
Imagine a community preparing for a storm; they need to communicate clearly about potential risks and share their insights. If everyone understands both the nature and magnitude of the threat, they can collectively agree on the best preparations, just like a sports team strategizing before a game.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
We also got key questions that are to be addressed. To what extent are hazards, risks, and disasters within society currently well known? How can the social construction of risks be effective for DRR?
This chunk presents the critical questions that guided the discussions at the summit. Questions revolve around the awareness of hazards within society and how social understanding of these risks can enhance disaster risk management strategies. This reflection is vital for improving response measures and community resilience.
Consider a classroom where students are taught about fire safety. The teacher asks what they know about fire risks. By understanding each student's prior knowledge, the teacher can shape the lesson to better address misconceptions and enhance safety protocols, much like assessing community knowledge to inform DRR.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Disaster is not just a natural context, but it is the social vulnerability, how it puts them into the risk, how hazard makes them into a disaster and that is where the H*V=R.
The speaker emphasizes that disasters arise not only from natural events but also from societal vulnerabilities. The formula presented (H*V=R, where H is hazard, V is vulnerability, and R is risk) indicates that without vulnerability, a hazard might not lead to disaster. Understanding this relationship is key in creating effective disaster management strategies.
Imagine two villages faced with the same flood; one is well-prepared with proper infrastructure and resources, while the other has limited capabilities. The flood might lead to challenges in the unprepared village, illustrating that the risk (R) of disaster is significantly influenced by their vulnerability (V).
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
When we talk about knowledge, how local knowledge understand risk because the scientific knowledge understands in a different way but how the local knowledge have perceived the risk.
This section highlights the distinction between scientific knowledge of risks and local knowledge gained through lived experience. Recognizing and integrating local knowledge can significantly reduce vulnerabilities and enhance the effectiveness of DRR strategies. Local knowledge can often provide insights that are overlooked by traditional scientific assessments.
Think of a local farmer who has experienced several droughts over the years. They might have developed unique irrigation practices that work best for their area, differing from general scientific recommendations. By valuing their knowledge, DRR practices can be refined to be more effective in specific contexts.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
One has to really look into what is acceptable, to whom, by what, from what and what is an unacceptable risk, maybe different cultures perceive that in a different way.
This chunk discusses how perceptions of acceptable and unacceptable risks vary across cultures. Understanding these perceptions is crucial in tailoring disaster management strategies that resonate with local communities. This insight is particularly important for effectively engaging communities in DRR efforts.
Imagine a community living near a volcano. For them, living with the risk of an eruption may be seen as acceptable due to the fertile land it provides. Meanwhile, another culture might view such a risk as unacceptable, showing how deeply local beliefs shape perspectives on risk.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Social Dimension of Risk: Understanding how societal factors influence risk perception.
Local Knowledge: Insights from communities that shape their risk management strategies.
Cultural Context: Different cultures have distinct understandings and acceptance of risk.
Education in DRR: Importance of introducing disaster risk reduction concepts in educational institutions.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
A community near a river may develop flood resilience strategies based on historical flood patterns shared by elders.
A school curriculum that includes disaster preparedness training enhances the understanding of risks among students.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
In every community, knowledge is key, / For risks understood can set us free.
Once in a village beset by floods, the elders shared tales from years past, guiding the youth on how to build resilient homes. Their experiences shaped the community's preparedness.
Remember RISK: 'Recognizing Individual and Society's Knowledge.'
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: GADRI
Definition:
Global Alliance of Disaster Research Institutes, a platform for discussing and advancing disaster risk reduction.
Term: DRM
Definition:
Disaster Risk Management, the systematic process of identifying, assessing, and reducing risks associated with disasters.
Term: Social Vulnerability
Definition:
The susceptibility of a community's members to the impacts of hazards based on their social disparities.
Term: Local Knowledge
Definition:
Insight and understanding held within a community based on historical experiences and cultural practices.
Term: Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR)
Definition:
Strategies and measures taken to minimize the damage caused by natural hazards.