Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Today, we're going to dive into the various categories of adopters when it comes to innovations. Can anyone tell me the five categories?
Are those innovators, early adopters, early majority, late majority, and laggards?
Exactly! One way to remember these is with the acronym 'IEEMLL'—Innovators, Early Adopters, Early Majority, Late Majority, Laggards. Why do you think these categories are important?
I think it shows how different people react to new ideas and technology.
That's a great point! The timing of when someone adopts an innovation can really impact its success. Let’s also discuss how social networks influence adoption further.
Let's switch gears to talk about micro and macro level networks. Can someone explain what these terms mean?
Micro level relates to personal or direct interaction, while macro level is about larger communities or indirect connections, right?
Exactly! Think of it as a small, close-knit community versus a large city. How do you think these networks impact someone's decision to adopt an innovation?
The smaller networks might give more direct feedback, making it easier to decide.
Very insightful! One individual's positive experience can influence many within a micro network, but it may take longer to reach more distant connections within macro networks.
Now, let’s focus on the importance of timing. Why do you think time is a crucial factor in adoption?
Maybe because if too many people are adopting something, it feels safer to try?
Exactly! That’s the concept of social proof. Initially, an innovator like person A encourages others to adopt, but if no one else is adopting, it discourages others, like person B. Can anyone see the importance of community perception here?
It shows how someone's network can completely change their decision-making process.
Absolutely! When we understand these dynamics, we can foster more effective strategies for introducing innovations.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
This section explains the categories of adopters in innovation, including innovators, early adopters, and laggards, emphasizing the influence of social networks and the differences in adoption at micro and macro levels. It also discusses the implications of exposure and time on the adoption process.
The concept of adoption is pivotal in understanding how innovations spread within communities, categorized primarily into five adopter types: innovators, early adopters, early majority, late majority, and laggards. Innovators are those who eagerly embrace new ideas and technologies, often resulting in significant influence over their peers. The innovators set a precedent that influences the categorization of early adopters, who adopt the innovation shortly after its introduction, and the majority adopters, who follow suit after observing its success within their networks.
The section also elaborates on the dynamics between micro-level networks (personal, direct interactions) and macro-level networks (wider, indirect interactions), illustrating how innovations can spread from individual to entire communities or cities. An example is provided where individual A, surrounded by a supportive network, adopted an innovation early, creating a ripple effect. In contrast, individual B, despite being in a similar affiliation network, lagged behind initially but eventually adopted later, showcasing how perceptions and willingness evolve over time. The varying influence of social proof and exposure regarding these innovation processes reflects a deeper understanding of adoption thresholds and characteristics that shape these networks. By recognizing the factors at play, particularly in regions with different thresholds, facilitators can better strategize the spread of innovations.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Here, we are talking about I found this really awesome tool because they will just tried it but then you know at this stage I wish I do try it using this earlier, it is great so you know, they sometimes repent, better we have not tried it before it has been a successful you know, so like that these laggards.
This chunk discusses the concept of 'laggards,' who are individuals that adopt new tools or technologies much later than others. The text implies that laggards often regret not adopting earlier when they see the success of a tool that they hesitated to use. This indicates that there are different speeds at which people adopt innovations. Understanding who the laggards are can help us see the spectrum of adoption behavior.
Think of a new smartphone released on the market. Many people rush to get it, excited about its features. However, some hold back, unsure if they should switch from their current phone. As months pass and reviews showcase its advantages, those who waited often realize they should have upgraded sooner, leading them to feel regret about their hesitation.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
We talked about the micro level network which has to do with the personal and direct diffusions. And the second one is with a macro level networks which has an indirect networks, how from what we are using in Delhi and how it spreads to different cities.
This chunk distinguishes between micro and macro-level networks regarding how innovations spread. A micro-level network refers to personal and direct interactions—like friends discussing a new app. In contrast, a macro-level network describes broader, indirect connections, such as how trends in one city (like Delhi) can influence neighboring areas. Both types of networks play vital roles in the adoption of innovations.
Imagine you start using a new fitness tracking app. Your friends (micro network) notice it when you discuss your results, leading them to try it. Simultaneously, the app gains popularity in your city through social media and public advertisements (macro network), inspiring other cities to adopt it based on your area's buzz.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
If you see an example now, here a person A who have a group of 5 friends and he is the one who have actually taken the risk of starting it. And then, whereas in the person D, he is still in a conservative but his; all his surroundings still relying on his own ways of thinking.
In this chunk, the behavior of individuals in a social circle is explored. Person A represents an innovator who is willing to try new things, influencing their friends. Conversely, Person D is characterized as conservative, sticking to familiar methods despite peer influences. This highlights how personal attitude towards innovation can vary even within the same social group.
Think of two friends, Emily and Sarah. Emily is quick to try the latest health trends, encouraging Sarah to explore them, while Sarah prefers her regular diet. Over time, Emily's enthusiasm might inspire Sarah to take the plunge, illustrating how early adopters can lead the way, while conservatives may need more time to come around.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
There are 2 reference points which we are referring in this small example, one is A and one is B. A has an exposure of 60% around him who are using these tanks and B has none.
This chunk introduces the idea of exposure to innovation and how it can influence adoption over time. Person A, with a high exposure to people using a new product (e.g., tanks), adopts more quickly, while Person B, with no exposure, does not adopt. This illustrates that awareness and social circles greatly affect decision-making in adopting new innovations.
Consider a new restaurant that opens up in your neighborhood. If most of your friends eat there and rave about it (representing a high exposure scenario), you are likely to go and try it yourself. But if you have no friends who’ve been, you might remain unaware and never consider going—your adoption is heavily influenced by your social circle's experiences.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
What are the adopter categories, this is a bell shaped curve which shows the individual innovativeness and percentages in each category, there has 4, 5 aspects as we discussed the laggards at the end the innovators on the front.
In this chunk, the adoption categories of innovations are explained using a bell-shaped curve model. This model typically includes five segments: innovators, early adopters, early majority, late majority, and laggards. Each segment represents different behaviors regarding the adoption of new innovations, with innovators being the first to accept a new idea and laggards being the last.
Imagine the launch of a new video gaming console. The first few people to buy it are the innovators, excited about the latest technology. Following them are early adopters, who buy it for the exclusive games. As more people get in, we see the early and late majorities joining in until finally, only a few laggards switch over, often after the popularity has peaked.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
And with the micro level or the neighbourhood level, as I told you that there is a very low threshold, low threshold, high threshold and the laggards.
This chunk focuses on the 'threshold' concept, which defines how easily individuals in a network can adopt new innovations. It explains different thresholds: very low, low, high, and very high, which reflect how likely someone is to adopt based on their social network dynamics. Understanding these thresholds is crucial for strategizing how to promote innovation.
Think of different types of friends in a group: Some are easily influenced and adopt new fashion quickly (very low threshold), while others need more persuasion and time (high threshold). When new trends come into the group, those with lower thresholds will adopt quickly, while those with higher thresholds may take longer, impacting when a trend becomes popular.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Adopters Categories: Innovators, Early Adopters, Early Majority, Late Majority, Laggards are essential in understanding how innovations spread.
Micro vs. Macro Networks: Personal networks allow for direct influence, while macro networks represent broader societal connections.
Time Exposure: The timing of adoption, influenced by one's social circle, plays a significant role in whether individuals will embrace change.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
An individual widely known as a tech enthusiast adopts a new smartphone, inspiring his friends to follow suit due to social proof.
In a community where early adopters showcase a new technology, others may wait to see its success before adopting it themselves.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
Innovation's like a stream, flowing swift and bold, Innovators dive right in, while Laggards stay on hold.
Imagine a small village deciding whether to adopt a new farming technique. Innovators are the brave farmers trying it first, inspiring others, while laggards observe and wait.
IEEMLL: Innovators Eagerly Embrace, Majority Later Linger.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Innovators
Definition:
Individuals who are the first to adopt a new innovation.
Term: Early Adopters
Definition:
Individuals who adopt new innovations shortly after innovators.
Term: Laggards
Definition:
Individuals who are the last to adopt an innovation.
Term: Micro Networks
Definition:
Small, personal networks that allow for direct interaction and influence.
Term: Macro Networks
Definition:
Larger networks that involve indirect connections and broader community interactions.