Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Today, we are going to explore the concept of adopter categories. Can anyone name the main categories of adopters?
Um, there are innovators and laggards, right?
Exactly! We have Innovators, Early Adopters, Early Majority, Late Majority, and Laggards. Let's break that down. Innovators are risk-takers who try new things first. Can anyone explain the next category?
Early Adopters are the people who see the success of innovators and then decide to adopt.
That's correct! They influence others and often act as opinion leaders. Remember the mnemonic 'I-Feel-Early-Late-Lags' to help you recall the sequence. Who wants to tell me about the next group?
The Early Majority adopts innovations after seeing some successes!
Good job! The Late Majority follows them, and finally, we have Laggards. These can be resistant to change. So, what do you think influences individuals to move from one category to another?
Maybe their social networks or friends who have already adopted something?
Exactly! Social networks play a crucial role. Let’s summarize: Innovators take risks first, Early Adopters follow, then the Early Majority, Late Majority, and finally, Laggards. Always remember the categories: I-FEEL-EM-LL!
Let’s discuss how networks impact adoption. What’s the difference between micro-level and macro-level networks?
Micro-level networks are personal connections, like friends and family.
Right! And macro-level concerns larger societal influences. How might personal interactions influence someone’s decision to adopt an innovation?
If I see my friends using something and they love it, I might try it too!
Exactly, that’s peer influence at the micro-level! Now, can someone give me an example of how macro-level might look?
Like how a new technology becomes common in a city, making me want to use it too.
Great example! So, whether we look at micro or macro networks, both significantly affect the diffusion of innovations. Let’s recap today: Micro networks are personal; macro networks involve society. Remember 'Friends Influence, Society Trends!'
Now, let’s discuss adoption thresholds. What does ‘threshold’ mean in this context?
It’s the level of exposure someone needs to feel comfortable adopting something?
Correct! Can anyone provide an example of low and high thresholds?
A low threshold might be something popular like a smartphone, while a high threshold could be a new, uncertain technology.
Good distinctions! It varies among individuals too. What category may have a very low threshold?
Definitely Laggards, they wait a long time!
Yes! They have high thresholds, while Innovators have very low. Thus, one way to remember: 'Innovators Embrace, while Laggards Hesitate.' Understand the significance of thresholds?
Yes, it determines how quickly or slowly people adopt technologies!
Exactly! Let’s summarize: thresholds vary and significantly impact when people choose to adopt or not adopt innovations.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
In this section, we explore the definitions and implications of the various adopter categories in the diffusion process, such as innovators, early adopters, and laggards. It highlights how personal and social networks affect these categories and introduces the concept of thresholds in adopting innovations.
This section delves into the adoption of innovations, categorizing individuals based on their willingness to adopt new technologies or ideas. The main categories include:
Additionally, the section emphasizes the role of micro-level (personal networks) and macro-level (broader societal networks) influences on the adoption process. Thresholds in adopting refer to the levels of exposure necessary for individuals to decide to adopt an innovation. The dynamics of these categories may vary over time and influence the overall diffusion process significantly.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, what are the adopter categories? This is a bell-shaped curve which shows the individual innovativeness and percentages in each category. There are 5 aspects as we discussed: the innovators at the front, followed by early adopters, early majority, late majority, and laggards at the end. This is a kind of bell-shaped curve.
The adopter categories help us understand how people adopt new technologies or innovations. The bell-shaped curve represents the spread of innovation among individuals, from the first to adopt (the innovators) to the last (the laggards). Innovators are those who are willing to take risks on new ideas, while laggards are more resistant to change. The early adopters and majority groups fall somewhere in between, usually adopting after seeing that the innovation has been proven feasible and beneficial.
Consider a new smartphone. Innovators are the early users who pre-order it before it even hits the shelves. Early adopters see their friends' positive experiences and quickly purchase the phone themselves. The early majority waits to see reviews and how the device performs in the real world, while the late majority only gets it when they notice almost everyone owning one. Finally, laggards stick to their old phones until their model is no longer functional.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
And with the micro level or the neighborhood level, as I told you that there are very low threshold, low threshold, high threshold, and the laggards, so you have the personal network threshold defined as an adoption network exposure at the time of adoption.
Threshold levels refer to the varying degrees of openness an individual has to adopt new innovations, influenced by their social connections. For example, someone with a very low threshold might adopt an innovation quickly as soon as a few people in their network do, while those with high thresholds might need more assurance and a higher proportion of their peers adopting the innovation before they decide to try it themselves. The concept illustrates how peer influence can drive the rate of adoption.
Think of a new diet fad as an innovation. A person with a very low threshold might start following the diet as soon as a few friends try it and share their success. In contrast, another person may not adopt it until a significant number of people in their circle have had success and they feel convinced that it's worth it. This dynamic shows how social groups can influence personal decisions about adopting new trends.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now, if we take the perception of the most innovative and the conservative, if you see an example now, here a person A who has a group of 5 friends and he is the one who has actually taken the risk of starting it, and whereas in person D, he is still in a conservative mindset but his surroundings... Despite other friends, he is being stable.
This chunk emphasizes the contrast between individuals who are more innovative and those who are conservative. Person A takes the initiative to try new things, inciting his friends to follow suit. Meanwhile, person D remains resistant to change, influenced by his conservative mindset. This illustrates how social dynamics affect individual decisions regarding innovation adoption. It suggests that innovators can inspire their peers to take risks, while conservative attitudes can prevent change even within a close-knit group.
Imagine a group of friends deciding whether to try out a new restaurant. One friend who loves exploring new cuisines (Person A) encourages the group to join him. If most friends are indifferent, Person A's enthusiasm might sway at least one or two of them to venture out. Conversely, a friend (Person D) who always prefers the familiar might resist, sticking to their favorite local diner despite hearing rave reviews. This scenario highlights how some people drive change while others hesitate.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
There are two reference points... A has an exposure of 60% around him who are using these tanks and B has none. We call it time phase 2, so by looking at his case now, A has adopted that, and B still has not.
The concept presented here examines how the levels of exposure to an innovation among peers can change over time and influence adoption decisions. At an initial point, Person A has many users in his network contributing to his decision to adopt. Meanwhile, Person B, who does not have a similar level of exposure, has yet to adopt the innovation. As time progresses, the networks' dynamics can shift to encourage or discourage adoption, showing how timely peer influence plays a critical role in the adoption process.
Think of a new social media app. Initially, only a few of your friends have it, resembling Person A's experience. You see them posting about it and enjoying it, which influences you to join in. On the other hand, if you start with a group of friends that hasn't yet adopted the app (like Person B), you may be less likely to try it until clearer peer validation arises. Over time, as more friends adopt the app, you may feel compelled to join as well.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Adopter Categories: Definitions and characteristics of Innovators, Early Adopters, Early Majority, Late Majority, and Laggards.
Micro-Level Networks: The influence of personal relationships and direct conversations on innovation adoption.
Macro-Level Networks: The effects of broader societal influences and indirect connections on adoption rates.
Thresholds: The levels of exposure necessary for comfortable innovation adoption.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
When a new smartphone is released, Innovators are the first to purchase it, while Laggards may only consider it after several years.
In social settings, when a new health app is introduced, Early Adopters might encourage others to try it based on their positive experiences.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
From Innovators who dare to take the risk, to Laggards, slow and never brisk.
Imagine a small village where the Innovators first try a new irrigation system. Gradually, Early Adopters see its success and encourage others, leading to full community acceptance by the time Laggards decide to try it.
I-FEEL-EM-LL for Innovators, Early Adopters, Early Majority, Late Majority, and Laggards.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Innovators
Definition:
Individuals who are the first to adopt new innovations and are often characterized by their willingness to take risks.
Term: Early Adopters
Definition:
Individuals who adopt innovations after seeing initial successes; they often serve as opinion leaders.
Term: Early Majority
Definition:
This group adopts innovations after a degree of acceptance among their peers, typically after Early Adopters.
Term: Late Majority
Definition:
Individuals who adopt innovations after they have already been widely accepted; they tend to be skeptical.
Term: Laggards
Definition:
Individuals who are the last to adopt an innovation, often resistant to changes in their routine.
Term: Threshold
Definition:
The level of exposure required for an individual to feel comfortable adopting an innovation.
Term: MicroLevel Networks
Definition:
Personal relationships and direct social interactions that affect innovation adoption.
Term: MacroLevel Networks
Definition:
Broader societal influences and indirect connections that affect the wider adoption of innovations.