Then we have outcome-based criteria; these are participations from what we can achieve from the participations what are the outcomes it not necessary that if you follow a particular process an ideal process of participation it not necessary that it would deliver you a good outcome good effective outcome. So then outcome-based criterias we expect that what are the results expected desired results okay.

So based on that we can actually develop these framework. On the left-hand side we have process of public participation, on the right-hand side, we have outcomes of public participation like for the process of public participations we may consider early engagement of the community and representations of. So early engagement of the community it means that community should be involved from the very beginning of the participations.

Community is not a black box there are a lot of differences among themselves some is based on class, based on gender, based on caste, status. So we should ensure, try to ensure that all the representative of all sections should participate into this process.

The third criteria process-based is the clear and agreed objective at the outset. Many cases that we discussed with the community but we do not have any agreed objectives, or maybe we do not have any clear objectives. It is always evolving, so it is better to make a very clear objectives.

Okay, continued engagement of the community okay it is not that you asked them invited them to participate in the very beginning and then you forgot them. No, you should not forget them you should actually continue consultations with them involving them in every sphere of the planning process.

Fairness is a kind of component that we discussed that we are saying that okay is sometimes people participate but it is just a physical participations they do not have any power or the freedom to express their own opinions.

Many cases people are invited, people are engaged, but maybe the financial agency the major financial resources that is coming from the external agencies. Community has less contribution financially... community has a very less power, very less stake to influence the decisions.

Capacity building means that the community in order to engage with other stakeholders to negotiate with other, to bargain with other, or to involve in discussions critical discussions they should have certain knowledge or skills.

Good facilitation process; there should be enough skill like face to face and using local language not to widen the scope of the program exercise.

Many cases that latent knowledge, tacit knowledge that are important. So we should try to grab that knowledge people experience, people use their experience and their traditional living with the same place that develop a knowledge and that that can even.

Another one is the outcome of public participation, like participation should be successful in terms of implementations. It is not that we are making a plan we are talking and then we forgot about everything.

Mutual trust, that should be achieved through participations, stakeholders should believe among themselves they should be able to resolve conflict, distrust among themselves that would called an ideal participations.

If there is a kind of distrust may not be we always be able to reach to an agreed decisions but at least one group should know that what are the concerns what are the problems there from another perspective, from another groups perspective.

Another one is the time effective that if the project should be finished within a particular time, it should not be too long, should not be too short, so these are the criterias of public participations.